Newsom’s polling lead is slipping away has dropped to within the margin of error. The next few weeks should be very interesting.

He had a press conference over the weekend and was nasty and petulant with reporters who kept asking questions about the recall. He wanted to talk about climate change.  A climate change in Sacramento is what we really need.

I thought Righties hated Black people.

 
Are we going to play by the same rules as the idiot liberals and call anyone who doesn't support Larry Elder a racist?

 
For the record, Larry Elder would be my vote if I still lived in CA.  

 
Question for the class, Do you think the lefties are going to twist themselves into pretzels trying to defend their hypocrisy or do you think we'll just get crickets out of them on the subject?

Several aspects of recall strategy have led the CA GOP to forego endorsing a candidate. But the key one is money.  
1. California Recall Financing Law. There are no limits on Newsom’s fundraising for Vote No on the recall. He’s raking in tens of millions from Silicon Valley and Hollywood donors. The Republican candidates, on the other hand, are operating under limits set for gubernatorial campaign contributions. From a fiscal standpoint, it benefits the GOP to have many individual candidates raising money to throw against Newsom’s fiscal juggernaut.

2. Avoid Unnecessary Intra-Party warfare. If the state party endorses one candidate, all the shunned candidates will feel robbed, and their supporters’ enthusiasm will dampen. Remember the main goal of the party is ousting Newsom, who replaced him is secondary.

Basically the cost of endorsing a candidate (pissing off voters and stakeholders) isn’t worth the end result (being able to say “We Endorse X” when a State Party endorsement is not likely to increase turnout or be a key to winning the recall.

Newsom has the fundraising advantage. Polling shows Republicans have the enthusiasm advantage.  An endorsement out of party HQ in Sacramento would only dampen enthusiasm.