Politics and Religion

Re: Laffy, is that you ?!?!?!?! I thought I was on your ignore list???teeth_smile
Panthera12 356 reads
posted

I took GaG's advice and started to ignore the retard and he begged on each of my posts last night.
I can envision him throwing a temper tantrum at his keyboard with a nee nee required to calm himself down.

Please send him that box of crayons.

Snowman391944 reads

Since everyone seemed to lack the courage in the last thread to challenge the facts of the story and just attack the source (an old and discredited liberal trick, just ask all those involved in the Lewinsky story).

Here is the story, there is a photo. If you can prove it is fake, by all means post. If you can justify Pier's blatant hypocrisy, by all means post. However, if the best you can do is attack the source, do us all a favor and STFU and move on....
 

It's the classic "do what I say, not as I do" hypocrisy seen in so many other Establishment Mockingbirds who demand that all citizens deserve to be disarmed, at the same moment they are packing serious heat.  The list is massive:  
 
1.  Michael Moore, the hygiene-challenged, gun-grabbing director of the propaganda flick, "Bowling for Columbine," who has repeatedly called for citizen disarmament while being personally protected by a detail of armed-goons.  
 
2.  Mayor Michael Bloomberg who has been behind a new wave of persecution of gun-owners in New York, is protected by taxpayer-funded armed goons and a concealed-carry permit.  
 
3.  Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), also has a detail of armed private security as well as a nearly-impossible-to-obtain-at-any-price NY concealed-carry permit.  
 
Now, there's that piece of putrid English Redcoat, Torry Dog Snot known as Piers Morgan; who regularly uses his bully CNN pulpit to tout the complete disarmament of American citizens. Some enterprising reporter went out to his home and found that he is a client of a "home protection system" that guarantees "fully-armed response" to any and all those cowans and interlopers who may linger too closely on Morgan's property line.  
 
It would seem that Morgan is a pea from the same pod with the rest of the anti-constitutional collaborator brethren, they make damn sure that first their asses are well-covered and that their needs are taken care of, and it's "to hell with the little people," "let 'em die," or "go buy a watchdog."  

...can someone give me a direct link to the picture, because I'm not seeing it.

hypocritical about that sign or Mr. Morgan's using an armed security firm - and made absolutely no comment about the source of the article which I agree with you is irrelevant to the hypocrisy issue raised by the OP.

      There is no hypocrisy here bc Mr. Morgan has never said that private security guards should be unarmed, because these armed security guards are in fact "veteran police officers" with proper carry permits and bonds, and they are not armed with assault rifles or machine guns but with the same handgun as that used by local LE.

       Significantly, the OP for once was so at loss for words of rebuttal that he did not attempt to rebut any pf these points other than to assert that I put too much weight on their having a license. OK fair enough but that does not rebut the bottom line that these are highly trained off-duty veteran police officers who do no more than secure the premises, detain any suspect, and call the police. This is not the rampant and dangerous gun use of which Mr. Morgan to his credit has objected.

Snowman39393 reads

so you believe in special rights for those who can afford it...

Where the HELL do you work to get that kind of mentality, K street????

Not fruitful to resurrect a highjacked post! Chinese saying? Well, nope! I just made that up. However, it's quite obvious that I did, and no less obvious than the statement.   ;)

-- Modified on 4/9/2013 9:47:29 AM

Register Now!