Kamala as presidential candidate has had no interviews, no press conferences, no published statement of views, never competed in the 2024 primaries, never got a single delegate, never got a single primary vote.  Today the Democrat machine installed her as their nominee.
.
Did the public want a chance at picking their candidate? Democrat machine doesn't care.

She's never been impeached, never screwed thousands of middle class workers by filing bankruptcy 4 times, never been indicted, never been found liable of sexual assault, never kissed the asses of dictators, never asked her running mate to break the constitution, etc.
.
As for the public picking their candidate, you do realize she was on a ticket chosen by the American people or did you forget the 2020 election? We are quite happy with our nominee. Are you having second thoughts about yours? After the week he had, you would be crazy not to.

You can't seriously argue that had the Democrats had an open primary with all interested candidates, they would have picked Kamala. We know from 2020 this is not true. Democrat voters were denied a voice. They been handed no choice.  
.
And the only way we would know if they are all happy is to let them pick the nominee from an open primary, which is now not possible. You only speak for yourself.
.
Robert, the more you throw principle to the side for expediency the easier it is to do it again next time.

It was open to everyone. Guess what Lester? No one wanted to run against her. Did you want Democrats to force someone to compete against Kamala? Do you hear any Democrats complaining about the process? Why are you SOOOOOO concerned about what WE do? It's your party that has the convict...we have the prosecutor.

Harris DID compete in the 2024 primaries and got millions of primary votes. As Vice President. So when the Presidential candidate withdraws who do you EXPECT will step in?
And I don't hear any Dems complaining.
Only Fester.
Because he's shitting his pants.

Robert, serious question, do you believe in participatory democracy or not?
.
Many people don't. As far as I can tell most progressives hate democracy other than as a skin suit.

How did Fester miss that? In fact, Trump hates democracy so much he'll just end it if he wins.

And when he admits he started an insurrection to STOP democracy from happening. And when he asked his VP Mike Pence to break the constitution. And when he set up those "fake electors." And when he admits he tried to rig the election in Georgia.  
.
What all that happens Lester, then you can lecture me all you want about "progressives hating democracy."

without engaging his brain.

He HAS to argue that she would have won anyway.  It's the only argument that makes him just look misinformed rather than a moron.  Lol

ads showing who Kamala really is cause her poll numbers to start slipping, it will be the Dems who are shitting their pants.  

Who is the chameleon?  
http://www.snopes.com/fact-check/vance-trump-hitler-quote/
.
Shady Vance called Trump "America's Hitler."
Shady Vance called Trump "the fruit of the party's collective neglect."
Shady Vance called Trump "cultural heroin. He makes some feel better for a bit. But he cannot fix what ails them, and one day they'll realize it." (Vance said that about willy, Lost, followme, lester, et al., and, perhaps not realizing it, HIMSELF.)
Shady Vance tweeted, "Fellow Christians, everyone is watching us when we apologize for this man. Lord help us."
.
Now Shady Vance kisses Trump's ass, licks Trump's boots, and let's Trump walk all over him.

If Biden had just done the right thing and announced he wasn’t running again back in 2023.

Harris only got 3% in polling in the 2020 primaries and had to drop out before the first primary contest. Nobody wanted her. Not a single vote. Ever.

I asked the question on a thread earlier to see if just ONE person could explain what makes her qualified as a president.  

This question was asked and answer well over a week ago. To paraphrase the answer:
1) Harris was a prosecutor and DA in SF for years.
2) She was elected Attorney General of CA in 2010.
3) She was elected Senator from CA in 2016.
4) She has been VP since 2021.
So that's a record of elected public service nearly two decades.
But you don't care. Because you hate facts and think your opinions are the only "facts" that matters.
That's why you are the SPOAT.

What makes her qualified today. What identifiable things could attribute to her being a US President  

Now tell us, SPOAT, how an extensive history or experience in politics and the law isn't relevant? Only if you're a Dem, right, SPOAT?

What..... you don't like someone saying something you've already said?? Awwww damn. That's a shame. A damn shame.  

As for Harris' "far from impressive" law experience you just exposed AGAIN how little you actually know. As a DA she was "chief of the Career Criminal Division, supervising five other attorneys, where she prosecuted homicide, burglary, robbery, and sexual assault cases – particularly three-strikes cases."
As CA state AG,"In 2011, Harris obtained two of the largest recoveries in the history of California's False Claims Act over excess state Medi-Cal and federal Medicare payments.[69][70] In 2012, Harris leveraged California's economic clout to obtain better terms in the National Mortgage Settlement against the nation's five largest mortgage servicers."
There's more. Lots more. But The SPOAT will certainly choose to remain ignorant and spew more lies.

Nice job of googling Kamala to see if she did anything remotely relevant. My point exactly. You don't know either. I don't need a Wikipedia link. I could have done that on my own.  
So basically you surrender to the fact again that....you don't know. Good job of keeping up TATL. Good job.....

Because he has no life. And, actually, I DID know about Kamala's record. But those of us who care about FACTS like to use actual SOURCES to back up our assertions. Unlike you who spouts lies and opinions and presents them as facts.
And you would NEVER have "done that" by putting up a link. Because you don't care about facts and wouldn't know one if you tripped over it.
Get a life, loser.
Now cue up more lies about how you were out partying last night and just "dropped in here."
We're all laughing at you.
Loser.

Actually I fucked last night. At my home. Again. 3 times for me this week. How about you. Awwww dang..... that's right. Zero again. Oops! Sorry.  

Cuz that's the only way he got laid. But, actually, we know the truth. The Dolt stayed home all night posting on TER and fell asleep sobbing softly into his pillow.
Biggest Loser Of All Time = BLOAT.

I'm beginning to wonder??? Is this all you got left?

But thanks for admitting you didn't go out last night, BLOAT.
No wonder you're ashamed to be seen in public.

For those who haven't seen, go check out the general discussion board and look for a post called screening requirements. A female poster there handed icky dicks ASS to him on a silver platter! She flat called his pathetic ass out. Want to talk about embarrassing! Then take a look at the long list of lies he tries to spew to save face. At TATL, everyone laughs at the miserable pathetic old guy with zero life and nothing but misery to spread.🤣🤣

pathetic is stalking me to another board, then bringing it here and lying about it. Actually, everything I wrote on the other board was correct. And the other poster was a combative, judgmental bitch who went away when I pushed back.
Oh, well, at least that makes her smarter than The Dolt. Then again, anyone is smarter than The Dolt.
Try again, fool.

Hey, dont be mad at me, I didn't post it. She did! I just laughed......and laughed....and laughed. And she did NOT "go away" btw she made you look even more stupid a 2nd time.  
It was an enjoyable read. Can't fault someone for reading on another board now can we Mr LIE my ass off!