Write Review
2,077,918 Total Reviews 3,687 New Reviews
9,403 Users Online

Politics and Religion

Re: Interestingly
impposter 49 Reviews 72 reads
posted

Source? An example?

There have been much greater threats than 9/11 that were thwarted, when the participants gained entry into the country through the Mexican border. They operated inside the boarders of the us till they were discovered and captured.
Source? An example?
2.5 billion out of the defense budget is a drop in the bucket and it’s reallocation by the then commander in chief trying to defend and secure the nation? That was a good thing.
You assume that "border wall" is the only and best way "to defend and secure the nation."  It was controversial from the get-go for numerous reasons. In some places, a wall CAN be the best solution. In other places, monitoring (satellites, drones, etc.) and rapid deployment is the preferred approach. Nobody but Trump and his cult felt that a 40 foot tall, 2000 mile long concrete wall was the way "to defend and secure the nation."  
.
Furthermore, Congress passes the budgets which stipulates how various allocations can and cannot be spent. Trump reallocated military funds for housing, etc., for the border wall and that was subsequently found to be illegal. If you can't get full funding for 2000 miles of concrete, and if you claim to be the world's greatest negotiator, then work with Congress and get them to approve strengthening border security a piece at a time using various technologies.  
.
(Congress allocated military aid for Ukraine to be administered by the DoD and it came with very specific time requirements. Trump placed his cronies into key positions at the DoD and had them hold back the aid while he "negotiated" with Zelensky for "a favor."  
http://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/16/trump-administration-broke-law-in-withholding-ukraine-aid.html
Trump administration broke law in withholding Ukraine aid, watchdog says as Senate prepares for impeachment trial.
"The Trump administration broke the law by withholding congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine last summer “for a policy reason,” a top government watchdog said Thursday in a scathing report.
...  
The GAO report said that the Office of Management and Budget cited “a policy reason” for withholding $214 million in funds appropriated by Congress to the Defense Department for security assistance to Ukraine.  But a policy reason “is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act” to withhold funds appropriated by Congress, GAO said. “The withholding was not a programmatic delay. Therefore, we conclude that OMB violated the ICA.” “Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law,” the report said. The agency noted that the Constitution “specifically vests Congress with the power of the purse.”
..."
.
Likewise, Trump illegally reallocated military funding to build a border wall.

followme268 reads

From veterans. More proof real fuck-up joe hates veterans, as he checks his watch.  

 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/republican-senators-bill-blocking-biden-va-resources-border

 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-mayorkas-veterans-affairs-resources-southern-border-migrants

 
Two Fox links in one post, that will really trigger the reprobate TER lefties and I’m sure a repugnant backstabber too.

 

2022 = 28

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4657 reads

Hypocrite.

Related Link: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/26/appeals-court-trump-wrongly...

ReplyQuoteReport
LostSon45 reads

No one I know either still in or retired feels “stolen from” about 2.5 billion from the defense budget going into the boarder wall. Illegal immigration is a horrific threat to national security. The left simply sees it as more voters for their side and not an easy door way for actual enemies of the Country to pour in through.  

There have been much greater threats than 9/11 that were thwarted, when the participants gained entry into the country through the Mexican border. They operated inside the boarders of the us till they were discovered and captured.

2.5 billion out of the defense budget is a drop in the bucket and it’s reallocation by the then commander in chief trying to defend and secure the nation? That was a good thing.

Your response is purely partisan Hackery!

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4641 reads

Being in favor of it is true partisan hackery.

ReplyQuoteReport
impposter73 reads

Source? An example?

There have been much greater threats than 9/11 that were thwarted, when the participants gained entry into the country through the Mexican border. They operated inside the boarders of the us till they were discovered and captured.
Source? An example?
2.5 billion out of the defense budget is a drop in the bucket and it’s reallocation by the then commander in chief trying to defend and secure the nation? That was a good thing.
You assume that "border wall" is the only and best way "to defend and secure the nation."  It was controversial from the get-go for numerous reasons. In some places, a wall CAN be the best solution. In other places, monitoring (satellites, drones, etc.) and rapid deployment is the preferred approach. Nobody but Trump and his cult felt that a 40 foot tall, 2000 mile long concrete wall was the way "to defend and secure the nation."  
.
Furthermore, Congress passes the budgets which stipulates how various allocations can and cannot be spent. Trump reallocated military funds for housing, etc., for the border wall and that was subsequently found to be illegal. If you can't get full funding for 2000 miles of concrete, and if you claim to be the world's greatest negotiator, then work with Congress and get them to approve strengthening border security a piece at a time using various technologies.  
.
(Congress allocated military aid for Ukraine to be administered by the DoD and it came with very specific time requirements. Trump placed his cronies into key positions at the DoD and had them hold back the aid while he "negotiated" with Zelensky for "a favor."  
http://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/16/trump-administration-broke-law-in-withholding-ukraine-aid.html
Trump administration broke law in withholding Ukraine aid, watchdog says as Senate prepares for impeachment trial.
"The Trump administration broke the law by withholding congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine last summer “for a policy reason,” a top government watchdog said Thursday in a scathing report.
...  
The GAO report said that the Office of Management and Budget cited “a policy reason” for withholding $214 million in funds appropriated by Congress to the Defense Department for security assistance to Ukraine.  But a policy reason “is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act” to withhold funds appropriated by Congress, GAO said. “The withholding was not a programmatic delay. Therefore, we conclude that OMB violated the ICA.” “Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law,” the report said. The agency noted that the Constitution “specifically vests Congress with the power of the purse.”
..."
.
Likewise, Trump illegally reallocated military funding to build a border wall.

ReplyQuoteReport
LostSon61 reads

It’s complete bullshit that the VA is being tapped to fund illegal immigration.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!