Politics and Religion

Another orgy of illegal human slaughter undertaken in the name of "Humanitarian Help"
SteveO5711 1087 reads
posted
1 / 17

To those who think this isn't a problem for us, look at gas prices.  As long as there is a threat on the Saudi boarder, oil and gas prices are going to be inflated which will really hurt us.  Never mind the cost of all the refugees running to Europe that they can't afford (remember, we do allot business with them).

Want to know the ultimate goal here?
Weaken Gadaffi so that his own people can drag him into the street and hang him.  
If we're lucky, maybe he'll run and we can pick him up.  Remember, this guy killed allot of Americans, he's one of the original major terrorists
Then Europe can go in and clean it up, since it effects them more directly than us and we got our hands full.

To those that criticized Obamas statement that we would not commit ground troops, he most likely didn't want taliban recruiters running around Afghanistan telling everyone that the Americans are going to Libya.

Read some history on this guy, believing any reports coming from his officials is blatantly stupid.
Are we going to hit some civilians here...  definitely.  He'll put them in fount of the targets.
Right after the attack started, he through a street party by his compound just to make sure there were civilians in the area to get hit.

anonymousfun 6 Reviews 1440 reads
posted
2 / 17

I was totally against Iraq but Libya is a different situation. Gaddadfi unleashed his War Planes and tanks against Libyans. Your oil logic is bit flimsy. See link.

Applying the oil logic doesn't work in this case. There are oil companies in Libya but they are not the usual suspects.

Oil production by Libya is not that significant. Oil reserves in Libya are the largest in Africa and the ninth largest in the world with 41.5 billion barrels (6.60×109 m3) as of 2007. Oil production was 1.8 million barrels per day (290×103 m3/d) as of 2006, giving Libya 63 years of reserves at current production rates if no new reserves were to be found. Libya is considered a highly attractive oil area due to its low cost of oil production (as low as $1 per barrel at some fields), and proximity to European markets. Libya would like to increase production from 1.8 Mbbl/d (290×103 m3/d) in 2006 to 3 Mbbl/d (480×103 m3/d) by 2010–13 but with existing oil fields undergoing a 7–8% decline rate, Libya's challenge is maintaining production at mature fields, while finding and developing new oil fields. Most of Libya remains unexplored as a result of past sanctions and disagreements with foreign oil companies. All the money from oil exports thus far is in Gadffi's pocket.








Madison_Ohare See my TER Reviews 1953 reads
posted
3 / 17

when the rabbit squels, the fox will come a running but not to help...he has other things on his mind"

Posted By: meinarsche
Those who were asking how well defined the goal of protecting Libyan citizens through air-intervention was now have their answer. Bomb Libya back to the stone age.  As if things aren't bad enough, we now have another war in a volatile region, couched in the repulsive Orwellian doublespeak of "humanitarian aid," and "no-fly zones."

Neo-libs are in a state of staticus orgasmus.  As you may remember, war is evil-unless of course it is sprinkled with the magic pixie dust of UN approval, endorsement along with "humanitarian" rhetoric, in which case the dead bodies and terrified children shitting their pants are all considered to be worthwhile.  I'm sure it's a coincidence that Libya has the largest oil reserves of any country on the African continent.  Liberals who have been raging against the Neo-Con doctrine of pre-emptive war for years may now rest smug in their delusion that bombs dropped with the blessing of the UN don't cause the same carnage.

The ever-skanky Hillary Clinton last month publicly stated with all ruborous charm of an infected scrotal hair that the US was supporting "rebel groups" (translation? Al Qaeda), and the British, French and American Special Forces operators were already on-the-ground in Libya.  From the git-go this had nothing at all to do with "humanitarian concerns," and everything to do with replacing the leader of Africa's richest oil country with a more responsive puppet of the globalist's choosing.  

Equally repulsive is the figure of Barry Soetero-the "peace candidate," who spent most of last week obsessing over basketball scores while Fukushima burned.  The ultimate globalist bankster sock puppet did make enough time to obey his orders and send American fighter planes hurtling toward Libya's "no fly zone."

Congress sits idly-by, as usual pretending that Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution does not exist. According to this long-ignored section, ‘‘The Congress shall have Power To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.”

The countries that will lead the war – Britain and America – are virtually bankrupt as their populations are told to pay higher taxes, suffer crippling austerity measures and tolerate soaring food prices, billions more pounds and dollars will need to be added to the debt burden in order to properly destroy and cripple Libyan infrastructure, before giving corporations like Halliburton huge no-bid contracts to rebuild the country.

The notion that an administration which has aggressively accelerated drone attacks in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Yemen that have killed 90% innocents has suddenly developed a conscience for human suffering is a putrid fallacy.

Further reading:

War with Libya:

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/war-with-libya.html

"Almost" isn't a problem with horseshoes, A-bombs and Predator Drone strikes:

http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2009/0627_drones_singer.aspx

The pending economic collapse of the Anglo-American detente:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/debt-problem-who-in-the-world-is-going-to-buy-the-billions-of-dollars-of-debt-the-u-s-government-is-constantly-pumping-out-now

Meaningless blather from Barry Soetero:

http://www.naturalnews.com/031735_Obama_radioactive_fallout.html







charlie445 3 Reviews 3080 reads
posted
4 / 17

That was a nice touch. I am puzzled though Mein. What exactly is a globalist?

Madison_Ohare See my TER Reviews 1734 reads
posted
5 / 17

and controlling the masses of people.  There is a shadow government, the global elite that pulling all the strings.....funding both sides of the war to enslave the people.  We are useless eaters and they are the barron robbers.  And I read today that BP is drilling for oil off the shore of Libya.  They are doing it right under our noses and we are sitting still like Jews when they saw the Holacaust coming.  We have got to wake up or we will just observe this new world order happen and lose all our rights and liberties.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 1693 reads
posted
6 / 17

Neo-libs want a world governed by corporate dominance. Neo-cons want a world governed by corporate dominance, but really like to lie about it.

inicky46 61 Reviews 992 reads
posted
7 / 17
inicky46 61 Reviews 1422 reads
posted
8 / 17

Oh, God! I keep agreeing with AF!  You go, guy!  I must be gay!

quadseasonal 27 Reviews 1355 reads
posted
9 / 17

Most people realize  corporate America builds big buildings,often with numerous  restrooms, open to the public.
Many corporate buildings , even those with first floor security, will have an available  rest room, the public may use in an emergency.
A lot of jobs are created, keeping those restrooms clean, which gives me job security.

On the other hand Mom and Pop, Stop and Shop stores and businesses,will usually have a sign, "No Public Restrooms", on top of the fact, they are more often discriminatory, in their hiring practices.
Granted I am being selfish, since my  job security is due to my  superior  shit flushing skills.
If Mom and Pop stores took over the world, I would be out of my job.

One of the main reasons I support  Corporate America.
I have no desires to learn, how to dig outhouse holes.







-- Modified on 3/21/2011 8:47:16 AM

anonymousfun 6 Reviews 1443 reads
posted
10 / 17

a right wing publications somewhere. Most of them are not true from an economic sense but true from a numerical point of view.

If you are familiar large numbers (number theory) these numbers trivial.

Bottom line, you are saying, America can prosper only when 75% of the world is poor and cannot produce a damn thing. When they also climb the economic ladder, we can only complain about it.

I say, not the case. We can out innovate and produce really, really complex products no one else can and that is where like to be rather than mass producing sandals and toys.

Timbow 1187 reads
posted
11 / 17

http://energycitiesmasterplan.com/  :)
 

And Total Oil
As recently as 1992, the French government still held 5% of the firm's shares.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_S.A.

http://www.libyaonline.com/business/details.php?id=15827


-- Modified on 3/21/2011 7:13:01 AM

mattradd 40 Reviews 2746 reads
posted
12 / 17

I can't ever find any restrooms available in corporate buildings, when I need them, when just coming in off the street! ;)

charlie445 3 Reviews 1766 reads
posted
13 / 17

world in is the production of and deployment of high end naval weapons systems.

charlie445 3 Reviews 1161 reads
posted
15 / 17

either way Mein, we are all fucked so we might well all fuck ourselves to death.

allthebetter 1251 reads
posted
16 / 17

What happened to the principles this country was founded on and the memories of all those who fought for them?

Lost in a pool of greed, self interest, corruption at the highest levels and obfuscation.

What we do makes a mockery of the men and women who serve.

-- Modified on 3/22/2011 3:07:09 AM

inicky46 61 Reviews 1730 reads
posted
17 / 17

Oh, calm down.  What an awful thing, venting in a joking way on a hooker/john site.  Get over yourself with your preachy bullshit,  mein.

Register Now!