
Well let's first talk about Obama being an evil socialist. What is socialism? Socialism refers to an economic theory of social organization advocating social or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods. Asking a society whose top 1% controls more wealth than its lower 90% to carry more weight in taxes is not an example of Socialism. Nor is a nation’s government accepting responsibility that the health of its constituents is an inalienable right to be extended to all.
Capitalism is the economic system in which the means of production are owned by private persons, and operated for profit and where investments, distribution, income, production and pricing of goods and services are predominantly determined through the operation of a free market, rather than by central economic planning. Capitalism is not bad in concept. It affords any person through the means of "entrepreneurship" (more on this later) the freedom to build a mountain from a mole. However, under the term in which we live, capitalism can be better described by using the term "pimps and ho's" with the elite (or top 1%) being the pimps and the rest of us ho's. Some of us ho's will prosper "because ho's gotta eat too", but by design there will always be a vast disparity between that the top and the bottom. This is why things in this country don't make sense. How does it make sense that the wealthiest nation in the world has the highest rate of poverty as compared against its wealth? How is it that the wealthiest nation in the world ranks 38th in life expectancy as it relates to death of natural cause?
I don't know how many of you watched Bill Maher yesterday but there was an interesting quote cited (I don't remember who made the quote) but it said something like: Capitalism can be viewed as a game of poker where a couple of the players control 90% of the chips. At a certain point the only way that the other players can remain in the game is to borrow. Once the controlling players are either no longer willing or able to lend the game ends.
What "trickle down" is about is giving those few players that control 90% of the chips even more chips so they can continue to lend chips out to the struggling players. These players will continue to struggle under this system but the game in theory can be extended a little longer.
There's another quote from Marx that reads: "Capitalism tends to improve manufacturing or technological development efficiencies. As technological innovation becomes more and more streamlined/mechanized, the need for entrepreneurship declines". "Capitalism eventually becomes a bureaucratic process of large corporations and organizations, no longer requiring entrepreneurship. As this happens, capitalism loses its primary driver (the entrepreneur) and dies out".
Capitalism (under the form in which we practice):
A. forsakes the concerns of the MAJORITY (lower 90%) in favor of the MINORITY (upper 1%)
&
B. validates the top 15% and deceives the lower 85% into worshiping an ideal that is good in its definition but evil in its application
What Senator Obama is proposing is not an end of capitalism or "the free market". What's he's proposing is adopting some ideals that one can argue could be related to socialism in nature. What he's talking about is empowering the middle class with more chips SO THE GAME CAN KEEP GOING. But the difference is that by empowering the middle class innovation and "entrepreneurship" can again be sparked in this country and new industries like (Energy Technology) can spring up. What's wrong with that if the system is broken? I won't tell you what's wrong with it but I will tell you why you think it's wrong. It's mainly this: http://www.redroom.com/video/tim-wise-creation-whiteness-clip. It's the reason that the McCain campaign has been harping on the phrase "spreading the wealth" because it taps into this mindset. It's what Tim Wise (noted above) calls the "overseer complex".
The Republican Party has been a perpetrator of this complex that teaches us to protect our ideal of enslaving ourselves to the elite without even knowing that we're doing it. What he talks about is that WE ARE ALL SLAVES under this system but the entire racist movement was designed to divert attention away from the enslavers and give the whites an enemy (blacks) to place blame on as an explanation as to why in spite of their hard work, they didn't seem to be getting ahead.
The Republican Party has demonized anything that goes against this system. The term socialist is now basically a slur not far behind terrorist and is used in a way to describe why America is so much better than every other nation (most of whom practice forms of socialism). We're not talking about a "redistribution of wealth" what we’re talking about is greed. The greed that is destroying our great nation that was founded on the principal that no man had any right over another in his pursuit of the American dream. We're not talking about socialism, what were talking about is the fact that are not living up to the principles that this country was founded upon. What we're talking about is that under these principals everyone's life should hold the same value, regardless to whether you are in the highest tax bracket and can afford the best health insurance that money can buy or if you were born into poverty and thus can't afford to protect your health. Your life.
Republicans (or should I say "My Friends"), you've been fed the wrong dose of medicine. As a result you're suffering from delusions and hearing voices in your head of Fox News correspondents that are telling you that your mission is to protect these ideals. The same ideals that hurt YOU unless you become one of those that are holding most of the chips. But we all know that will never happen. None the less, like a good soldier you march into battle without even knowing who or what you're fighting for
This is a clip from The Pathology of Privilege: Racism, White Denial & the Costs of Inequality, the newly released video from the Media Education Foundation. The video is of a speech given by Tim Wise at Mt. Holyoke College, October 1, 2007.
http://www.redroom.com/video/tim-wise-creation-whiteness-clip
more here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3Xe1kX7Wsc
-- Modified on 10/19/2008 5:53:58 AM
-- Modified on 10/19/2008 5:54:32 AM
-- Modified on 10/19/2008 5:57:03 AM
-- Modified on 10/19/2008 6:02:59 AM
-- Modified on 10/19/2008 6:12:34 AM
-- Modified on 10/19/2008 6:21:47 AM
-- Modified on 10/19/2008 6:55:15 AM
These aren't exact quotes, since I don't have time to look them up, but..
I believe it was CK Chesterton that said In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism it is the other way around.
Reagan said, A communist is someone who has read Marx. A capitalist is someone who understands Marx.
I ask and ask and ask and never get an answer. Why do so many people from Germany, Sweden, France, and other countries still leave their home and family to come to a capitist society. They are wealthy countries with all the benefits. But they would rather be here.
The percent of traffic the other way is insignificant in comparison.
Sweden in pretty damn cold and I could understand them wanting to move somewhere warm. But more move to New York City that Cuba. And they would have it so good in Cuba. House by the bay, warm sunshine.... Nope
People by the thousands get on inner tubes and face being eaten by sharks to leave Cuba and go to slavery in the U.S. The funny thing is that they have relatives who have told them what it is like here and they still flock by the thousands knowing how bad it is.
I have been to about 30 countries. The place where they liked Americans the most and were most hospitable was Syria. (The second was the Soviet Union when the wall was still up.) I could go on for hours about how nice they were after they found out I was from the U.S. Giving me gifts that they didn't offer the French or Germans.
And I wondered why after 40 years of one-sided anti-American propaganda they were so nice. Then I realized: They hear from the government how bad we are. But everyone has a relative in Detroit, Glendale, or somewhere else that they also hear from.
Yes, we exploit, exploit, exploit, and people flock here more and more.
I don't know about your (Bill Maher's) poker analogy - doesn't really resonate with me but maybe that's just me.
What I do know is socialism, true socialism, doesn't work. I haven't been all over the world, but I have seen enough to know this. I spend a good amount of time in Tanzania and it is almost a case study of good intentions (of Julius Nyerere) gone bad through socialism.
Of course, the U.S. is not Tanzania. Socialism, true socialism, could not be implemented here due to the structure of our government system - and if it was implemented it would be a reflection of the will of the people - which I think is extremely unlikely.
A capitalist democracy will work, but appropriate government involvement and intervention is necessary in order to present the self-serving aspect of capitalism from caving in on itself. Anyone who thinks we would have the largest and most important economy in the world today without significant government intervention is simply not familiar with history.
I believe this is Obama's view as well. He is not a socialist nor does he desire true socialism. But, he recognizes rightly that this country is at a critical juncture and cannot afford to stay on its current path.
Obama is no more a Socialist than FDR was a Socialist. Xrist, all Obama is about is repairing and then strengthening the Social Safety Net destroyed by the GOP since the Age of Reagan and Deregulation. Obama MAY be wrong in his analysis, Obama may be wrong in his prescriptions, Obama may be wrong in his particulars, time will tell, but a Socialist?
I don't think that Obama thinks he is a socialist or would advocate it expressly.
I believe that he does not understand Marxist philosophy from which socialism derives, and not understanding it, he unwittingly adopts many of the derivations. All from good intentions.
I don't say this to denigrate him. Many extremely well educated people I know never really studied it. There is no reason for an attorney to be aware of "Marxist thought" than there is for him to be aware of a deconstructionist theory of literature. He studied torts and taxation and criminal and corporations. I would be $1,000 he never took "Legal systems of socialist countries." (I did, or, to be accurate, a class that spent half a semester on it.)
With that said, Marxist thought traces all things to economics. People commit crimes because they are poor is a typical example of economic determinism reflective of Marxist thought. In fact, most poor people don't commit crimes, many rich people do, crime rates may be higher in wealthy societies and lower in poorer. The correlation between the two in minimal.
The same goes for education, the lack of which is blamed often on poverty. Washington DC spends more money per pupil than any other city and their school suck. Schools that spend half that amount may do twice as well.
I believe it was Columbus where the federal court ordered billions to be spent on inner city schools. A fortune was poured into the system with no real improvement. It wasn't the lack of money that made the schools bad. But they are still trying to improve it that way.
The problem is if one has a world view that poverty causes these things, they will look to "spreading the wealth," to remedy it.
My one hope for Obama is when he spoke about parents being more responsible. (And remember, generally I don't like him but here I give him great credit.) If as president he can convince parents to turn off TV one hour a night he will do more to improve education that passing a thousand school bonds and spending a trillion dollars.
"...improve education that passing a thousand school bonds and spending a trillion dollars."
Yeah, so that we can spend those trillion dollars to prop up finanicial institutions that are crashing & burning.
I am not in favor of spending the trillions to prop up banks that are crashing.
But don't waste the money other ways either. Looking at poverty as a cause of bad grades will never cure the problem. (That is why, as a committed GOP, I think if he wins and gets serious about this he could do some good.)