Politics and Religion

Conservatives Are Seeing the Beginning of the End for Romneyred_smile
salonpas 1532 reads
posted

Finally Conservatives waking up to reality!


One of the more popular conservative blogs is redstate.com. The founder and chief cook and bottle washer, Erick Erickson, is way to the right of Rick Perry. During the run-up to the primaries he was wildly against Romney. On Nov. 8, 2011, he wrote an editorial that is definitely worth reading if you are interested in knowing what conservatives were thinking a year ago. In part, he wrote:

"Mitt Romney, on the other hand, is a man devoid of any principles other than getting himself elected. As much as the American public does not like Barack Obama, they loath a man so fueled with ambition that he will say or do anything to get himself elected. Mitt Romney is that man.

I've been reading the 200 pages of single spaced opposition research from the John McCain campaign on Mitt Romney. There is no issue I can find on which Mitt Romney has not taken both sides. He is neither liberal nor conservative. He is simply unprincipled."

Not exactly a ringing endorsement. But during the past year, Erickson's hatred of Obama was so great that he yelled himself hoarse against Obama, for example on July 18, 2012: he wrote: "Barack Obama's administration is filled with the ignorance of America you get from liberal academics" It's been like that almost every day all year.

But yesterday something new appeared: "When I wake up on Wednesday morning, I'm still going to have my wife. I'm still going to have my kids. I'm still going to have my family. And I'm still going to have my God. So will you." Later in the piece he said: "I'm not going to think the end of the world is upon us if my side loses." From someone who hates Obama with a passion and has railed against him all year (to great cheering from the comments section), this doesn't seem like an announcement of imminent victory.

In a Washington Post interview, Republican strategist Karl Rove had his Mene mene tekel upharsin moment when he blamed Romney's loss on the storm, even before the results are known, when he said: "If you hadn't had the storm, there would have been more of a chance for the [Mitt] Romney campaign to talk about the deficit, the debt, the economy." He seems to have forgotten that Romney has been saying all those things for 2 years. Surely 3 more days didn't matter. What he meant was the storm gave Obama a Commander-in-Chief test and he passed.

Timbow147 reads

Posted By: salonpas
Finally Conservatives waking up to reality!

One of the more popular conservative blogs is redstate.com. The founder and chief cook and bottle washer, Erick Erickson, is way to the right of Rick Perry. During the run-up to the primaries he was wildly against Romney. On Nov. 8, 2011, he wrote an editorial that is definitely worth reading if you are interested in knowing what conservatives were thinking a year ago. In part, he wrote:

"Mitt Romney, on the other hand, is a man devoid of any principles other than getting himself elected. As much as the American public does not like Barack Obama, they loath a man so fueled with ambition that he will say or do anything to get himself elected. Mitt Romney is that man.

I've been reading the 200 pages of single spaced opposition research from the John McCain campaign on Mitt Romney. There is no issue I can find on which Mitt Romney has not taken both sides. He is neither liberal nor conservative. He is simply unprincipled."

Not exactly a ringing endorsement. But during the past year, Erickson's hatred of Obama was so great that he yelled himself hoarse against Obama, for example on July 18, 2012: he wrote: "Barack Obama's administration is filled with the ignorance of America you get from liberal academics" It's been like that almost every day all year.

But yesterday something new appeared: "When I wake up on Wednesday morning, I'm still going to have my wife. I'm still going to have my kids. I'm still going to have my family. And I'm still going to have my God. So will you." Later in the piece he said: "I'm not going to think the end of the world is upon us if my side loses." From someone who hates Obama with a passion and has railed against him all year (to great cheering from the comments section), this doesn't seem like an announcement of imminent victory.

In a Washington Post interview, Republican strategist Karl Rove had his Mene mene tekel upharsin moment when he blamed Romney's loss on the storm, even before the results are known, when he said: "If you hadn't had the storm, there would have been more of a chance for the [Mitt] Romney campaign to talk about the deficit, the debt, the economy." He seems to have forgotten that Romney has been saying all those things for 2 years. Surely 3 more days didn't matter. What he meant was the storm gave Obama a Commander-in-Chief test and he passed.

shit and lies.  Who gives a fuck what Rove says.  His Super-Pacs have been billions down the toilet not doing anything but losing for your  loser Sarah Mitsy and Lyin' Ryan.  

What  chutzpah to take insurance away from 75 million children and poor people.

What chutzpah to dictate birth control methods to women.

What chutzpah to suggest huge tax breaks for the uber wealthy when trickle down hasn't done shit to create jobs since its inception.

How can someone as bright as you be so fooled by these fuckers Timbow?

Timbow238 reads

Posted By: JeffEng16
shit and lies.  Who gives a fuck what Rove says.  His Super-Pacs have been billions down the toilet not doing anything but losing for your  loser Sarah Mitsy and Lyin' Ryan.  

What  chutzpah to take insurance away from 75 million children and poor people.

What chutzpah to dictate birth control methods to women.

What chutzpah to suggest huge tax breaks for the uber wealthy when trickle down hasn't done shit to create jobs since its inception.

How can someone as bright as you be so fooled by these fuckers Timbow?

salonpas214 reads

This is the same BS from the guy who thought Tim Pawlenty or Mitch Daniels would be the nominee.

George Will: Romney 321, Obama 217, with Minnesota making a surprise defection to the red column.

Cokie Roberts: Obama 294, Romney 234. Colorado swings to Romney, but it’s not enough.

Matthew Dowd: Obama 303, Romney 235, with Obama edging out the challenger by less than one point in the popular vote.

Ron Brownstein:  Obama 288, Romney 250, as Nevada, Wisconsin, and Ohio put the president over the top.

Also on the roundtable, Democratic strategist Donna Brazile gave Obama 313, leaving Romney 225. "I think I gave President Obama 313. I've been going back and forth between 303, 313," she said.

Register Now!