The current economic crisis, I believe, has exposed the presidential candidate that does not have the capacity to lead...John McCain.

Over the past week he has claimed that the fundamentals of the economy are sound. Callously called for the firing of the SEC Chairman, a man well regarded within conservative circles.  First opposed and the supported the bailout of AIG.

McCain has clearly shown what type of leader he would be in crisis, the type that we cannot afford.  We cannot afford a leader who would act so callously and without regard to rational thought judgement.

These judgments, my friends, are not mine alone.  Conservative pundit George Will stated it much more eloquently than I when he said

"Channeling his inner Queen of Hearts, John McCain furiously, and apparently without even looking around at facts, said Chris Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, should be decapitated. This childish reflex provoked the Wall Street Journal to editorialize that "McCain untethered" -- disconnected from knowledge and principle -- had made a "false and deeply unfair" attack on Cox that was "unpresidential" and demonstrated that McCain "doesn't understand what's happening on Wall Street any better than Barack Obama does."

John McCain...too irresponsible to lead.

Yet Obama is dangerous because he's "ultra liberal" and "socialist."  Can't wait for GaGamb the buzz words he got from Fox blurbs.  

McCain is the epitome of American incompetence...which, unfortunately, will make him a hit among voters - the same way W was.  Man, I hope intelligence prevails this time.

I haven't seen you or anyone else disprove them.

Obama is one of the most liberal politicians out there and most of his proposals are socialist in nature.

You can't continue to refute the facts. Well I guess you can, but not convincingly. The facts speak for themselves, but as long as Obama is not an old white dude that's good enough for you.

Good Old Joe thinks FDR was president and on TV in 1929. Imagine if Palin said anything as moronic as that.

BO is not a liberal, he is a radical leftist. With crooks, loons and radical lefty pals.

Understand what is happening on wall st. and they both hope that everyone  is to stupid to see their part in it. How the fuck can a senator not know what wall st. is up to?

How the fuck can PROOF be provided to refute such broad, subjective terms like "ultra liberal" and "unqualified?"  lol.  Those aren't facts (unless the definition of "fact" changed overnight without my knowledge).  Nor have you presented an argument FOR the inactive, temperamental, mentally challenged candidate that you support.  

You're a fucking joke.  I've reserved legitimate responses for people that have attempted to make a half-way thought out argument.  You seemed to have started there, now you're just repeating shit I've already addressed as if I've forgotten that you haven't effectively refuted any of it.  Maybe it's a halfassed attempt to get me to back away from something I've already explained?  

You, Source, g0pgeezer, blackbelt...and others I can't remember..are now in the same category of "not worth responding to."

Just in case you've forgotten or are too stupid to find my post right above your's, here are my exact words.

"Obama is one of the most liberal politicians out there and most of his proposals are socialist in nature."

I was asked to substantiate my words by PPL and I did. Now it your turn to step up to the plate. Refute them if you can. or just STFU.

I doubt that you can or will do either.

In reading your tone I get the distinct impression that you really want to say 'dismissed' not 'addressed'.

McCain loses the "best use of judgment in picking a running mate" award; and if you can't see that, it makes you more "moronic" than who he picked.