First, I did not "blindly" support Bush. I disliked his comprehensive immigration reform. I did not like it when he nominated his legal counsel to the Court (old age, i forget her name). I did not like his expansion of medicare for certain seniors, since I thought it was not necessary. (My mother in law is well off. THere is no need for her to be on "medical welfare.")
Next, only one line of the post was reference Obama.
Third, I have supported Obama on several occassions. Most importantly, I supported him on some of his education positions, although others have been flawed.
I forget the details now, but there were a couple "bickering" threads about things that all presidents do, and I said that the guy deserves a break.
I find it funny that NOW Dems and kin are upset about "partisan" comments about Obama, when the hatred that Bush experienced was far worse.
Bush would go to Crawford and people would write letters to the L.A. Times. He would exercise, and people wrote nasty letters asking why he wasn't working. He chocked on a pretzel, and there were 1,000 theories that he was drunk. The images of him morphing into Hitler, the terms "Nazi," dictator, etc. It goes on and on. My cousins - educated, otherwise smart people - wondered why he always had to fly around "in that damn plane." (I told them AmTrack was sold out. They didn't like that.)
I said then that no good would come of it.
Indeed, I wasn't even an "apologist" in this thread. I just point out that he got handed a horrific problem of an unprecedent nature. I am no more an "aplogist" for him than I was for Licoln, FDR, or any other the others. But tossing in any reference to Bush years, even without mentioning the name, blinds you to the gist of the majority of the post.
If people who were not for Obama are "partisan," it is the seeds partly sown by the left.
Finally, I love the way that Obama inherited two "needless" wars. In his own words, adopting a position that the Dems shouted from the roof tops, one was a "war of necessity." If the other is "needless," why the fuck doesn't he just get out. Wasn't it that other Dem who asked, "How do you ask someone to be the last man to die for a mistake?"
At least Bush believed in it, even if he was wrong. Obama lets people die for something he thinks is a mistake.
Happy Thanksgiving
Posted By: Priapus53
your stance as a GWB apologist gets tiresome. Hell-------I voted for BHO & am damned disappointed with his peformance so far. However, like FDR, BHO "inerited " a shitty hand"---------eceonomy on verge of collapse, U.S. involved in 2 needless wars that cause us to flush billions down the toilet, etc.
FDR also got a lousy hand from Hoover---when he took office in 1933, unemployment rate was at 25%. In my opinion, Hoover & GWB are among the worst 5 Presidnts in U.S. history.( along with such dems as Andrew Johnson & LBJ )
However, that doesn't let BHO off the hook----he's certainly bungled many things up to now. As I've said previously, I think last good POTUS was Eisenhower; all POTUS's since then, Dem & GOP have been gravely flawed, IMO.
What seperates us, Phil, is that you're so blindly partisan, always attacking Presidents of opposing party,but POTUS's of your party ( IE, GWB ) get a "pass".
& a Happy Thanksgiving to you------

-- Modified on 11/25/2010 11:14:47 AM