Politics and Religion

Re: And the plot thickens
impposter 49 Reviews 22 reads
posted

NOT defending Biden, but providing some balance:
1. Trump claimed not to know who David Duke was, having met with him previously.
2. Trump claimed not to know who Felix Sater was ... when Sater had the closest office to Trump's own office in Trump Tower!  
3. Trump claims he didn't have sex w/ Stormy which she disputes.
4. Trump claims he didn't have a months-long affair with Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal which she disputes.  
5. Trump claimed he had no business in Russia ... despite the signed letter of intent ... which he continued to deny into November while discussions were still on-going.
6. and on and on and on and on and on ...  
.
Much has already been investigated. Go ahead and tie the loose ends together and issue a final report on the Biden stuff.  

Posted By: followme

Yes LTM and his pinko pals will of course attack the source  but, unlike LTM, the photo does not lie.  
   
 So joe said he knew nothing of the Ukrainian gas company and hunters dealing with them. Really?  
   
   
   
 2019 = 28

followme162 reads

Yes LTM and his pinko pals will of course attack the source  but, unlike LTM, the photo does not lie.

So joe said he knew nothing of the Ukrainian gas company and hunters dealing with them. Really?

 

2019 = 28

NOT defending Biden, but providing some balance:
1. Trump claimed not to know who David Duke was, having met with him previously.
2. Trump claimed not to know who Felix Sater was ... when Sater had the closest office to Trump's own office in Trump Tower!  
3. Trump claims he didn't have sex w/ Stormy which she disputes.
4. Trump claims he didn't have a months-long affair with Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal which she disputes.  
5. Trump claimed he had no business in Russia ... despite the signed letter of intent ... which he continued to deny into November while discussions were still on-going.
6. and on and on and on and on and on ...  
.
Much has already been investigated. Go ahead and tie the loose ends together and issue a final report on the Biden stuff.  

Posted By: followme

Yes LTM and his pinko pals will of course attack the source  but, unlike LTM, the photo does not lie.  
   
 So joe said he knew nothing of the Ukrainian gas company and hunters dealing with them. Really?  
   
   
   
 2019 = 28

Nowhere do I see anything even close to a defense of Biden, either of them.

 
Everything you just said about Trump has been in the public sphere for years and Trump not only survived, but thrived. Let's see how well Creepy/Sleepy does under one tenth of the same kind of scrutiny. Good luck with Pocahontas as your nominee. This really is going to be fan

Posted By: GaGambler
Re: You are right about one thing
Nowhere do I see anything even close to a defense of Biden, either of them.  

Everything you just said about Trump has been in the public sphere for years and Trump not only survived, but thrived. Let's see how well Creepy/Sleepy does under one tenth of the same kind of scrutiny. Good luck with Pocahontas as your nominee. This really is going to be fan

Everyone is quoting their favorite L-wing or R-wing source about the Biden stories. I'd like to see one final consensus report, based on sworn testimony and documented, factual claims.  I don't think that would move quickly enough through gov procedures.  Maybe someone has an extra-governmental way to do that: a multi-center academic report? a multi-media (NYT, Fox, WaPo, ...) consensus report? WARNING: such a report would likely be 100+ pages so you might have to do some actual reading.  
.
Trump thrived at the helm of his privately held and managed companies and his zero-consequence game show.  Trump has never known Board oversight or had anyone to challenge or question his decisions (as represented by the legal scandals, above).  
.
He is hardly "thriving" as POTUS where his dictatorial approach to leadership (agree with me or you're fired), negotiation (my way or the highway), uninformed policy decisions (let's try this, no that; withdraw, invade; bomb, don't bomb; tariffs, no tariffs, Xmas, tariffs; ...), and egomaniacal narcissism is poisonous the country and beyond.  
.
As many pointed out BEFORE the election, including Graham ("You know how you make America great again? Tell Donald Trump to go to hell.” Graham attacked Trump’s proposal to ban Muslims from coming to the United States in particular. “He’s a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot” and “the ISIL man of the year” for stirring hatred against Muslims," "I think he’s going to lose and he’s going to lose badly,” he said. “You can’t nominate a nut job.” He also called Trump “just generally a loser as a person and a candidate.”" - http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/lindsey-graham-forgotten-how-much-he-hates-donald-trump/ ) , Trump was a dangerous choice for POTUS.

a rock and a hard place.  He couldn't support Trump in the beginning because of his life-long loyalty to McCain.  Point to something Graham has said AFTER McCain's death that is anti-Trump.  If there was any doubt about his support for Trump, that disappeared when he earned his stripes on the Kavanaugh confirmation.  

I assume you are admitting that there is nothing within the Ukraine matter that Trump did wrong, compared to the
Bidens?

Register Now!