So I haven’t looked closely at the polls in a few weeks. But I was looking at the polls in Michigan and I was reminded about something interesting I learned years ago.
How do we know carbon dating is accurate? If we test something and it’s 2.5 million years old, how do we know it’s accurate? Obviously no one has been around 2.5 million years to double check.
Well we can check on a shorter time scale and extrapolate from there. And we have multiple different methods for testing. Entirely different approaches using entirely different technologies.
So what happens when we do that? We get the same answer. Multiple different technologies that tell you it’s 2.5 million years old. Different technologies, same answer.
With that in mind let’s take a look at the polls in Michigan, via 538.
Trafalgar, Trump/Harris tied 47%
CNN Harris 48%, Trump 43%
Glengariff Trump 45%, Harris 44%
Redfield & Wilton Harris 47% Trump 44%
Emerson Harris 51%, Trump 48%
Activote Trump/Harris 50/50
Z to A Research Trump/Harris 47/47
Morning Consult 4 separate polls, Harris +2
EPIC-MRA, 2 polls, Trump +1
TIPP, Harris +2
We aren’t even getting the same answer, to such a degree that we don’t know who is in the lead. The CNN poll is the most obvious outlier. 3 polls are tied. All others show +1 to +2 for either candidate. So can anyone say either candidate is ahead in Michigan?