Congratulations on your election victory.  Your team did a heck of a job, but then to be honest, it was a little like shooting fish in a barrel, wasn't it.  Speaking of shooting, I'm really stressed about some things and thought what better way to get some answers than to write you directly.  Now let me say, I don't like it at all when innocent folks get shots regardless of their age.  But, I don't understand why the actions of the bad guys has to point us toward taking away rights/conveniences of the good guys.  "Bad guy shoots innocents, and our reaction is to take away the guns of the innocents"?  Where is the logic in that.  Why don't we just shoot the bad guy?  Or at least amend the legal system so that the bad guy gets his trial, appeals the results, etc... but in a manner that doesn't take 15 years.  Why couldn't we fix the legal system, punish the bad guy, and leave the innocents alone?

Think about the hundreds of millions dollars and all the hundreds of millions of innocents that have to now expose their stinky feet and let strangers take photos of their naked bodies just because some bad guy made a bomb in his shoe.  Now I'm not really in favor of Sharia Law, but every once in a while they do seem to have the right idea.  I mean why not cut off the bad guy's foot?  And while we're at it, why can't we cut off the rapists privates?  Why must we "always" punish the innocents when a bad guy does something?

Mr. President, did you know that the chemicals used by the First Lady in her garden could be used to make a bomb?  It's true.  If you want the formula, I can give it to you.  So imagine if your wife had to get a permit before she could buy her garden chemicals to make her veggies grow.  Or imagine that you needed a background check to purchase a tire iron because some bad guy used one for a weapon.  And oh my god, what if a bad guy uses his feces to poison someone.  Would we need a permit to do a number two?

Mr. President, I'm sure you are a reasonable person.  Surely you can look at this twisted logic and agree that the real problem is that we have bad guys.  We know who they are most of the time well in advance.  I mean that guy who shot up all those children was already considered extremely dangerous by his own mother but yet she never took him to a doctor or even told anyone.  Truth be told, it would make more sense to lock up mothers rather than take guns away from innocents.  I mean afterall, at least we have evidence that silent mothers could have actually prevented the murders if only they did their motherly job.

I hope you will reconsider your positions on this and focus on solutions that actually target the bad guys.   Thanks.