Politics and Religion

PS
impposter 49 Reviews 329 reads
posted
1 / 8

Just some miscellaneous Qs and comments.  
.
I already asked http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/a-legal-q-different-venue-mar-a-lago-stolen-documents-433707
Aileen Cannon, the Trump-friendly judge on the stolen documents case at Mar-a-Lago, can rig the jury. She can start the case tomorrow, empanel a jury to her liking (who will acquit Trump) and Trump will walk out a free man in less than one month.  
.
I can imagine her jury Qs:
AC: Juror 12. Do you think that you can make a fair decision on this case?
J12: Of course, Aileen! I already told you that, like 50 times. You're my favorite judge!
AC: OK, Mom. You're in. ... NEXT! Juror 13 ... "
Comments?
.
People are talking about the 14th Amendment being used to keep Trump off the ballot in several states. How about THIS Trump strategy to use where DJ Trump is banned from the ballot:
1. Not all states allow it, but assume that electors are allowed to change their votes or are not obligated to vote the designated winning candidate.  
2. Let the State RNC find another "Trump" to nominate and place on the "Pres" line on that State's 2024 ballot. OK, so it says "Donald L. Trump" instead of "Donald J. Trump." People will still vote for Trump.
3. Donald L. Trump campaigns with, "I will tell my electors to cast their vote for Donald **J.** Trump, so Vote for Me, Donald **L.** Trump!"
.
4. Or substitute a better campaigner (John Doe) for the Pres line with Ronald Trump as VP. "Vote for me, John Doe, and I'll tell my electors to vote for DJ Trump!"
.
In some states, it is illegal to promote a "fake" candidate in order to deceive or mislead the electorate:
http://apnews.com/article/miami-senate-elections-florida-elections-e8b70ce3270bd170e37a71ca80b5aaae
Ex-Florida senator charged in fake candidate scheme.
.
Would putting a fake "Trump" (not intended to truly vie for the office) on the ballot for POTUS be illegal? Suppose the fake "Trump" double-crossed the RNC and told "his" electors to vote for him and not DJ Trump?  
.
I've had a bunch more of these "What if ..." or "Would it be possible ..." thoughts but no time right now to post them.

LostSon 43 Reviews 55 reads
posted
2 / 8

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: Are you really…
…trying to strategize ways to rig the Presidential election? Didn’t you guys just say that the GOP was a threat to democracy? Is it justified to keep Trump out of office even if the voters elect him again and put him into office? Or do you think keeping Trump out of office is more important than letting the American People decide who their next President should be?
Of course the answer is keep trump out of office no mater
WHAT! I think they already took matters into their own hands once B U T, The lefties hate him enough to do what ever it takes to stay in power.  

4 more years of the lefties policies will further wreck this country and that’s NOT taking into account Joe Joe the potato slipping on a Kamala laid out banana peel 🍌 seriously… you know she is practicing on them and well the peels just accidentally wind up on the stairs. 🤷‍♀️  

Other points to consider, in the short term, when Israel starts laying absolute waste to Gaza and the pressure mounts from the left about dead Palestinian babies and you know there will be Rashida Talib who will be crying a Jordan River width swath of tears down the capital steps. Joe Joe if he is still kicking and keeping the presidents seat warm will fold! Shockingly fold!  

Or…

If China decides to smack Taiwan any of these possibilities will mandate (to them) that THEY HAVE TO stay in power!

LostSon 43 Reviews 44 reads
posted
3 / 8

The left already believes that they are more intelligent than the electoral,  especially  the right.

inicky46 61 Reviews 47 reads
posted
4 / 8

Don't you mean the "electorate?"
As for the rest of your word salad, it was almost incomprehensible and, to the extent it could even be understood, was filled with wrong-headed, virtually upside-down "logic." Like that the left was trying to take over when in fact it was the right that staged the Jan. 6 failed coup.
On a positive note, Looser is a lunatic but not even in the same league as the utterly idiotic and inept douchenozzle Dur-Dur.

inicky46 61 Reviews 14 reads
posted
5 / 8

Because you write like someone whose native language from some Third World country. Or maybe you're just mentally impaired? Either way, you are the most incompetent poster around. Even Looooser The ChickenHawk makes more sense than you.
Luckily for you, you seem incapable of embarrassment.
Good thing I am infinitely patient when it comes to punishing stupidity.
I enjoy burying my foot in your ass as many times as you stick it up.
How does that feel, dimwit?
I'm wiggling my toes now.

impposter 49 Reviews 58 reads
posted
6 / 8

Reading comprehension?  
.
My two topics were:
1. Cannon can stack the Florida jury to acquit Trump in the documents retention cases. That HELPS Trump.
2. Thus far, SCOTUS has not accepted any cases regarding the current attempts to use the 14th. Some states MIGHT be able to keep Trump off their ballots. My post was about OVERCOMING the use of the 14th by using fake Trumps to garner Trump electors for Trump. That HELPS Trump.
.
I don't want to help Trump. But I wanted to bring up the ideas before it comes as a surprise from elsewhere.

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: Are you really…
…trying to strategize ways to rig the Presidential election? Didn’t you guys just say that the GOP was a threat to democracy? Is it justified to keep Trump out of office even if the voters elect him again and put him into office? Or do you think keeping Trump out of office is more important than letting the American People decide who their next President should be?
In the meantime, I just read that Letitia James is ready to call Trump to TESTIFY in the $250+ million NYS business fraud trial and will likely call him within two weeks. With near certainty, the Prosecution will be allowed to treat Trump as a hostile witness. I've been fantasizing about what sort of Q&As will be allowed.
.
Prosecution: This is video [play] of you saying Judge Engoron valued M-a-L at only $18 M and that it is actually worth 100x or more than that amount ($1.8 B). Yes or No: Would you care to repeat those statements here and now, under oath?
Trump: Fake news! I never said that!
P: 33 or 11: Is your Trump Tower penthouse triplex closer to 33,000 sf or 11,000 sf in area?
T: Fake news!
P: In this phone recording [play] you claimed in the GA conference call that you won GA by hundreds or thousands of votes.  Would you like to repeat that claim here and now, under oath?  
T: Fake news! I never said that!
P: Y or N: Are you aware that your signed financial statements are, by law, supposed to be accurate?  
T: Can I get a Diet Coke, please?  
P: In this recent video [play], you say that your financial statements actually UNDERvalue your properties [and are, therefore, deliberately inaccurate]. Do you wish to repeat that claim here and now, under oath?
T: Fake news! I never said that!  
and so on. You get the idea: "You spoke or tweeted this lie in public. Do you want to repeat it here and now, under oath?"

inicky46 61 Reviews 20 reads
posted
7 / 8

I mean, you can't even make an adequate response. It's just pathetic.
Admit it, Dolt, you enjoy it when I swat you around. There's a sick part of you deep down that likes the attention.

inicky46 61 Reviews 16 reads
posted
8 / 8

OK, it's official. I have wasted FAR too much time on your inept, feeble ass for one night and no doubt the rest of the board is tired of watching me humiliate you. So I'm done with you.
You have a compulsive need for the last word so I know you can't help yourself and MUST take it!
Meanwhile, everyone is laughing at you.

Register Now!