Maybe even more, let's see:
1. What happened yesterday was wrong they say. OK ahh because here things are fine, right? But if had it happen in some  other, specially those poor nothing or unfree countries it would had been seen as a patriotic thing and considered patriots. I'm not saying they were or they were not. I just want to know why the difference when and when and where and where?  Don't know what I'm talking about? Let's say this were to happen in Venezuela, it would be "good" right?  
What I'm saying they all saying it over the News but about BLM and the treatment they receive from authorities and whatever. I say BLM are getting it good too. Go to Africa and protest and see how they get blown (as Laffy suggests ) away by that country or whatever other country is supporting or invading that country at the time. But they're making the same point as me and you are agreeing and supporting what they say. All I'm saying is that everything is stupid and I hate when you think you're right because you do or because you feel the victim. Both, all stupid sides and everybody does that.  

 
2. I'm sick of popcorn. Can't eat one more popped kernel.  
If something else were to happen, whatever, wherever and it was entertaining enough.  
Would you eat more popcorn or something else?  
Lick Lick

a) Nachos
b) Peanuts
c) Pretzels  
d) something else

Back to point #1... maybe you don't understand what I'm saying, I don't blame you. But here it is in intelligent and coherent way:  
The Western World see it one way and worry about themselves and won't support something against their interest.  
While China, Russia and Iran see it otherwise. That's what I'm trying to say, and sometimes it goes the other way around. You see my point now? Is it wrong to post it or see these differences? Sorry I'm like that.