The same Chris Van Hollen who voted NO on the Laken Riley act, is flying to El Salvador to bring back an illegal gang member.  

His is the poster child for hating America and turning his back on a murdered young woman and her family.

He’s a completely compromised dem senator doing the bidding of his left puppet masters… 🤷🏻‍♂️

Seriously who flys to Central America to free an MS 13 gang member?

He's looking out for his wrongfully deported constituent who the Supreme Court ordered RETURNED - you filthy fucking maga TRAITOR losers

I would expect the most stupid one here to support it. Snowqueen to the rescue. But of course since he's a treasonous bitch cunt fuck slap traitor filthy cunt bitch ass suck fuck cunt......bitch .....

Fuck you're dumb!!!

(Did I get all that right?)

No, of course you didn't get it right you treasonous little cunt.  Fuck you're dumb.  So, if the filthy maga traitor world of delusional stupidity DUE PROCESS is now non-existent (like you falsely claimed mass shootings were).  You know - part of EVERYONE'S civil rights and part of the CONSTITUTION which you filthy little treasonous cunts LIE about and FALSELY CLAIM to support.  Fucking moronic little sycophantic treasonous cunts.  

 
Due process, a cornerstone of the U.S. Constitution, ensures fairness and protection against government actions that could deprive individuals of life, liberty, or property. This principle, enshrined in both the Fifth Amendment (regarding federal government action) and the Fourteenth Amendment (regarding state government action), is divided into procedural due process and substantive due process. Procedural due process focuses on the fairness of the legal procedures used by the government, while substantive due process protects fundamental rights from government infringement, even if fair procedures are followed.  

 
Elaboration:
Procedural Due Process:
This aspect of due process ensures that the government follows fair procedures before taking actions that affect an individual's life, liberty, or property. This includes things like the right to notice of the proceedings, the opportunity to be heard, the right to present evidence, and the right to cross-examine witnesses.  

 
Substantive Due Process:
This area of due process protects fundamental rights that are considered inherent to the concept of liberty, even if the government uses fair procedures to take action. Examples include the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one's children.  

 
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments:
The Fifth Amendment protects due process rights against federal government action, while the Fourteenth Amendment extends those protections to state government actions. Both amendments use the same language, but the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause is interpreted to apply the same limitations to states as the Fifth Amendment does to the federal government.  

 
Historical Context:
The concept of due process has its roots in the Magna Carta, a document that limited the power of the English monarchy. The U.S. Constitution incorporated this principle to protect citizens from arbitrary actions by the government.  

 
Examples of Due Process in Action:
Fair Trial: The right to a fair trial, including the right to a jury, to legal representation, and to present a defense, is a fundamental element of procedural due process in criminal cases.  

 
Notice and Opportunity to be Heard: Before the government can take action to deprive someone of property (e.g., through eminent domain), they must provide notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard.  
Substantive Due Process and Privacy: The Supreme Court has recognized a fundamental right to privacy, including the right to make personal decisions about reproduction, which is a key aspect of substantive due process.

"The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order. Further, it claims in essence that because it has rid itself of custody that there is nothing that can be done. This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear."

 
So writes conservative Republican Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in a decision rejecting the Trump administration’s request for the appeals court to stop Judge Paula Xinis’s move for discovery as to whether the administration is defying the Supreme Court’s ruling that it “facilitate” the return of deported migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

 
The defendants in the case, filed by Abrego Garcia’s wife, include Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. (Wilkinson excoriates the defendants’ actions, justification, and subsequent inaction in short order.)

 
Slamming the notion that the government’s accidental deportation of Abrego Garcia is a challenging case laden with legal ambiguity, Wilkinson, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, wrote: "It is difficult in some cases to get to the very heart of the matter. But in this case, it is not hard at all.”

 
Articulating the “heart of the matter,” Wilkinson spoke plainly with the force of one of the U.S. constitution’s central claims as his support.  

 
"The government asserts that Abrego Garcia is a terrorist and a member of MS-13,” the judge wrote. “Perhaps, but perhaps not. Regardless, he is still entitled to due process.”

 
Wilkinson also addressed directly what the government presents as its quandary, centered in a specious claim that the order to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return did not mean his return had been mandated by the court.

 
Trump advisor Stephen Miller audaciously declared this week in the Oval Office that the Supreme Court decision was decided 9-0 “in our favor” — with his definition of “facilitate” meaning something like “to not prohibit” rather than “to make happen.”

 
Wilkinson called out that semantic chicanery, writing: "‘Facilitate' is an active verb. It requires that steps be taken as the Supreme Court has made perfectly clear.”

 
Wilkinson wrote: “The government’s argument is not well taken…in light of the Supreme Court's command.”

 
Addressing the impact that this particular breach of justice may have on the overall state of the republic and the ability of government to function as a democracy, Wilkinson also contributed a paragraph that reminds of Martin Niemöller's famous Holocaust-era authoritarian regime cautionary tale, which ends with the chilling regret: “Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.”

 
[NOTE: “First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out-because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out-because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me-and there was no one left to speak for me”]

 
Wilkinson wrote, with Orwellian cadence: “If today the Executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home? And what assurance shall there be that the Executive will not train its broad discretionary powers upon its political enemies? The threat, even if not the actuality, would always be present, and the Executive's obligation to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed' would lose its meaning."

 
Notably Sec. Rubio, who is named in the suit, had described a similar scenario when he ran for president in 2016 — back when he still believed Donald Trump was a danger to the rule of law. See below.

 
Now - will filthy maga traitor cunts talk about the ISSUE HERE?  Of course not - the filthy little cunts will deflect and talk about ANYTHING ELSE other than the blatant disregard for the CONSTITUTION - which these filthy little treasonous cunts FALSELY CLAIM to support.  Dumb filthy little cunts

He IS N O T a legal resident of THIS country!!!!!! Stop already with the lies that this, illegally here, wife abusing, ADMITITED GANG member is supposed to be in these United States.  

He’s been through due process (TWICE) that resulted in a deportation order.  

The only minor problem, he wasn’t supposed to go back to Elsalvador because of the threat of a rival gang. Which Apperently… that gang has been done away with.  So there ya go.

Now say it with me. This scum bag, who not a single one of you lefties would want to actually be in the same room with, is an El Salvadorian national. Who is now back in his home country.  Sooo if he weren’t an MS 13 gang member don’t you think their government would let him go?

Fuck you - you country betraying stupid little CUNT.  DUE PROCESS is a right of EVERYONE, not just US Citizens.  We realize you don't like that and you have to LIE about it.  But that's the TRUTH - you fucking little country betraying CUNT.  

 
Further - PROVE that he's an MS13 gang member.  The 'proof' that we given was that he wore a Chicago Bulls hat.  Is that enough evidence and 'proof' for you?  You stupid little fucking country betraying cunt.  Guess what DUE PROCESS would require.  That he's PROVEN to be MS13.  Which there is NO PROOF.  You fucking CUNT.   Other that convicted felon criminal traitor just stating that he is.  You STOP LYING bitch.  

 
Here's the FACTS - he is STILL afforded DUE PROCESS no matter what his legal STATUS is. You dumb bitch.  Further - there was a NO DEPORTATION ORDER issued.  That this filthy maga traitor cunt admin IGNORED.   FURTHER - the USA SUPREME COURT ORDERED that he be returned. YOU FUCKING CUNT.

The problem snowSOFTEE has with your post is that you are absolutely 100% correct and accurate.

 
The other thing is when you said FUCK's SAKE because he knows we know he can't due to his inadequacies (shall we  
say) which is similar to that of his felching partner ickypus

His obsession with this homosexual act knows no bounds.
Makes one wonder.

The filthy maga traitor cunts simply can't handle the truth and the facts.  They spew LIES and then believe the LIES no matter what.

hey ickypus how about allllll the times your felching partner and fellow necrophiliac uses the term sucking dick, why don’t you accuse him of being obsessed with a homosexual act?

This is what happens when he ingests too much of his own smegma.

And he and his felching partner and fellow necrophiliac are posting all day as I am having big fun.

Yeah those two are having big fun, of their own kind, too exchanging mouths full of santorum as they DFK all day.

It's what he does when he needs to come up with a new word and can't think if one on his own.
Weak.

The tired old worn out “urban dictionary” line.

Ickypus goes ape shit crazy and criticizes others for using lines over again  
And he does it more that everyone combine  

Apparently when ickypus uses that line the fact is that he is the one who had to look it up in urban dictionary. You know that projection thing he always does.  

He was long ago accurately busted for getting his lines from The Urban Dictionary but is quick to lie about it, just as he does with everything else.
And so he must continue to humiliate himself. Serially.
What a vile mess he is.

Oh you mean like the time the board democunt tried to pass off a republican led program designed to save money on taxes.... as if.... it were a democratic program? Yeah... I remember that too. Oh....... look. Here it is....

Now what's that you say about hating the truth...... Mr lie your ass off?

especially in this case because Democrats have supported the STAR program right up to the present day with DEMOCRATIC Governor Kath Hochul and her current budget.
But The SPOAT is such an idiot he didn't do his research.

There a difference between democratic program or democratic support......of a republican program. YOU clearly said a nice "democratic program" in your lie. You failed.  You lied. I just made you look like shit.  

Again. You lose as usual    

And it's The SPOAT. Not to mention, the bill passed in 1997 (with Dem support) which is nearly 30 YEARS AGO, you dimwit. Since then most NY governors have been DEMOCRATS. In fact, since 2007 EVERY NY Governor has been a Dem. So at this point it's no longer simply a Republican program. It's a Democrat program. You can lie until you're blue in the face (which we know you can do. But you can't change the facts.
Now let the lying SPOAT blather on and content himself with the Last Word.

And everyone knows who that is....  
Look at him try to squirm and weasel out of his own lies. What a spectacle

Urban dictionary line.  

 
You have no idea where or how I come up with what I say.
But the fact that you keep making that ridiculous accusation you are indirectly admitting that you have to look up what I say, and you just cannot cum, to terms with that.

 
 BTW I will not let you swallow my meat, stop begging.

"You have no idea where or how I come up with what I say."
The same goes DOUBLE for all your bullshit, you lying sack of crap.
Not to mention how humoresque I find your continual fixation on having me swallow your meat (and felching and Santorum).
Wow, you're dumb.

How can we NOT know what you're going to say. You're literally on perma-repeat mode saying the same shit (lie) over and over ....and over every day. Can you not see how much we make fun of you for it?? You're like a parrot  

Baaaaaakkkkkkkkkk. Last word!!
Baaaaaakkkkkkkkkk.... Loser
Baaaaaakkkkkkkkkk.....no game
Baaaaaakkkkkkkkkk.....pot=calling=kettle=black
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaakkkkk...... that one time in Costa Rica
Baaaaaakkkkkkkkkk........Rolex
Baaaaaakkkkkkkkkk.......Maserati  
Baaaaaakkkkkkkkkk......equestrian estate

he's getting too little oxygen to what's left of his brain.
What a pathetic display.
Time for The Stupidest Poster Of All Time to take his desperately-needed Last Word.
It's the only way to shut him up.

Does your stalker project and repeat himself much or what?  Get ready for his expected white knight retort. I'm bracing myself. LOL.

I forgot to mention that the parrot also loves his same ol "white knight" reply. So add that to Mr repeat.  

It's nice to know that the two oldest ones here stick together and act like 5 year olds. Nice job.....

See he couldn't help himself. So predictable, so prosaic, so much projection.

The fucking filthy maga traitor cunt has NO LIFE to speak of what-so-ever - other than hate posting on a fuk board

Just waiting for ickybiden to say something stupid so he can swoop in and go.....uhhhhhh yeah!!! What he said!!!!!
2 has beens on a fuk board who contrubutes ZERO with dicks so limp they've turned inside out. Damn......

Again with the white knight reference. Tell us what great contributions you have made to this board because everyone must have missed every single one. And what's up with your preoccupation with other members' dicks. It's really gay.  Something you want to tell us?

END OF MESSAGE

'The act cannot sustain the proclamation': Judge notes 'fundamental' problem with convicted felon criminal traitor's use of wartime law, becomes latest court after SCOTUS to block deportations

 
So, according to the filthy maga traitor cunt who posted the OP - all these Federal judges as well as the SCOTUS absolutely HATE America.  Simply because they are citing the Constitution and pointing out how the convicted felon criminal traitor admin is violating the law and the constitution.  

Fuck you filthy maga traitor cunts are SO FUCKING DUMB.  

 
A federal judge on Tuesday afternoon made Colorado the latest jurisdiction to issue a ruling in the ever-expanding federal fight over due process under the law by barring the Trump administration from summarily deporting immigrants under the auspices of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA).

 
In doing so, the court looked askance at the invocation of the AEA on a fundamental level and found President Donald Trump’s March 15 proclamation wholly lacking — divorced from both facts and law.

 
Citing the original authors of several now-prominent and authoritative dictionaries, texts explaining how language was understood by the Founders, and decades of case law, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney, a Joe Biden appointee, determined that the U.S. is simply not in an actual war with Venezuela or a transnational gang from within its borders.

 
And an actual war with a “foreign nation or government” — or an “invasion or predatory incursion” carried out by such a foreign entity — is expressly necessary for invoking the AEA, the court notes.

 
Judge rules Venezuelan migrants must be given 21 days notice before deportations
“Satisfied with what ‘invasion’ and ‘predatory incursion’ mean, the Court could stop,” Sweeney writes. “These words, fundamentally, demand military and wartime action. The Proclamation makes no finding that satisfies these definitional demands. Thus, to the extent the Proclamation relies on the Act’s ‘invasion’ and ‘incursion’ provisions to justify its removal powers, it does so improperly.”

 
Then, not content to leave the issue of warfare at all vague, the judge cites recent precedent on the AEA — specifically from the case that led to the U.S. Supreme Court‘s recent guidance that all potential AEA detainees are entitled to due process via petitioning for writs of habeas corpus.

 
“A central limit to this power is the Act’s conditional clause — that the United States be at war or under invasion or predatory incursion,” the court’s order reads, quoting U.S. Circuit Judge Karen L. Henderson.

 
The order goes on, at length:

 
Petitioners’ first argument, proceeds from a straightforward premise. The President’s authority under the Proclamation is “vested” under the Act. The Act demands, as a “statutory requirement,” an “invasion or predatory incursion.” And because the Act’s “text and history” use these terms “to refer to military actions indicative of an actual or impending war” — not “mass illegal migration” or “criminal activities” — the Act cannot sustain the Proclamation. The Court agrees with Petitioners.

 
During a hearing on Monday, Sweeney voiced concerns that the government’s resumption of swift-and-collective deportation flights using the obscure, 18th-century wartime authority was likely to run afoul of due process. The court’s order formalizes those concerns by extending an extant temporary restraining order until May 6.

 
“Petitioners have shown there is a ‘substantial risk that the harm’ of being subject to the Proclamation will arise — despite their current designation as individuals who do not fall under it,” the district court’s order reads. “Should their designation change, the Court has grave concerns that Petitioners would be afforded notice that comports with due process to challenge the determination.”

 
So, far, Sweeney says, the notice the Trump administration has provided putative AEA subjects is insufficient under the U.S. Constitution.

 
During the hearing, in an effort to have the restraining order lifted, the U.S. Department of Justice argued any would-be AEA deportations of individuals housed at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Aurora, Colorado, would occur with 24-hour notice.

 
The plaintiffs, in turn, rubbished that form of notice as not nearly enough — and pushed for at least 30 days of notice to contest AEA deportation.

 
In the end, the court split the difference, though heavily in favor of the request made by attorneys from the ACLU and the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network.

 
[T]he Notice provided to Petitioners — and, ostensibly, other detainees in the Facility — is deficient and fails to comport with due process,” the court observed. “Respondents are instructed — absent further guidance from the Supreme Court — to provide a twenty-one (21) day notice to Petitioners and the provisionally certified class they seek to represent.”

 
But Sweeney went a couple steps further, extending her ruling to cover detainees the government might subject to the AEA in the future and telling the government that its agents “shall not move Petitioners and members of the provisionally certified class outside the District of Colorado.”

 
In service of this ruling, the court’s order contains a brief discussion about the high court’s decision in another case brought under the AEA.

 
“The Court’s conclusion is bolstered — if not compelled — by A.A.R.P. and its procedural history,” Sweeney writes — referring to the Supreme Court’s highly unusual Saturday ruling which barred any AEA-based deportation flights in the sprawling Northern District of Texas.

 
In that case, a majority of justices “prohibited the government from removing members of a putative class that a district found not to be at risk of imminent or irreparable harm,” Sweeney observed.

 
Here, however, the circumstances are importantly different.

 
“[C]onsistent with A.A.R.P., it does not matter for habeas jurisdictional purposes whether Petitioners are or are not ‘currently’ detained pursuant to Proclamation,” the order goes on. “This is especially the case where such distinction was immaterial to the United States Supreme Court in granting a putative class the same temporary relief Petitioners seek here.”

 
While the judge only extended the restraining order for exactly two more weeks, to the day, Sweeney suggested there could be another “good cause” extension. Additionally, the court invited the plaintiffs to file a motion, due by Friday, for a temporary restraining order.

 
Stupid filthy maga traitor cunts