: Politics and Religion Discussion : Oops! 2 more!

bigguy30 4563 reads

posted 9 years ago

1 / 36

So now the new AG Jeff Sessions lied under oath!

END OF MESSAGE

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 354 reads

posted 9 years ago

2 / 36

At the very least, he'll have to recuse himself from the investigation...

...of the Russian involvement in the election and Trump's ties to Russia. He can't be in charge of the investigation when he is part of the investigation.

I'm sure righties will say that lying about a blow job is much worse than lying about conspiring with the Rooskies.

TwoMints 311 reads

posted 9 years ago

3 / 36

Parsed and omitted statements

Smalley: OK CNN has just published a story and I'm telling you this about a news story that's just been published, so I'm not expecting you to know, haha whether or not its true or not haha. CNN just published a story alleging the intelligence community provided documents to the president elect last week that included the information that quote "Russian operatives claimed to have comprising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump. These documents also allegedly say quote "there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government".

Smalley: Now again, I'm telling you this is a scummy (out?), so ya, know. But if it's true, but it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

JS I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians um, and I'm unable to comment on it.

Smalley: Without divulging sensitive information, do you know about this or what compromising personal and financial information the Russians claim to have?

JS allegations made about candidates get made about candidates all the time and they've been made about President Elect Trump alot sometimes, most of them, virtually all of them have been proven to be exaggerated or untrue. I would just say to you that I have no information about this matter. I have not been in on their classified briefings and I'm not a member of the intelligence committee, and um, I'm just unable to give you any comment on it.

In January, Sen. L asked Jeff for answers to written questions. “Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?” Sen L wrote.

Jeff responded with one word: “No.”

The first paragraph was left out of the article deceptively. It changes the meaning of the conversation.

The second quote from Sen. L. "about the 2016 election". He didn't ask if Sessions had met with an Ambassador while performing his Senate duties.

Throw shit at the wall. Hope something sticks.

hwy2heaven 169 Reviews 243 reads

posted 9 years ago

4 / 36

Moscow on the Potomac!

The new movie will have all the stars!

1. President
2. Vice President
3. Secretary of State
4. Attorney General
5. Gen. Michael Flynn
6. Steve Bannon

Guest Appearance by Kelly Ann Conway as the Russian hooker!

Too bad Robin Williams is not alive to watch this thriller.

bigguy30 390 reads

posted 9 years ago

5 / 36

The proof against the Liar-In-Chief is adding up!

The British and Dutch provided the US with intelligence, showing Trump associates met with Russian goverment officials in European cities.

Posted By: TwoMints

Smalley: OK CNN has just published a story and I'm telling you this about a news story that's just been published, so I'm not expecting you to know, haha whether or not its true or not haha. CNN just published a story alleging the intelligence community provided documents to the president elect last week that included the information that quote "Russian operatives claimed to have comprising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump. These documents also allegedly say quote "there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government".

Smalley: Now again, I'm telling you this is a scummy (out?), so ya, know. But if it's true, but it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

JS I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians um, and I'm unable to comment on it.

Smalley: Without divulging sensitive information, do you know about this or what compromising personal and financial information the Russians claim to have?

JS allegations made about candidates get made about candidates all the time and they've been made about President Elect Trump alot sometimes, most of them, virtually all of them have been proven to be exaggerated or untrue. I would just say to you that I have no information about this matter. I have not been in on their classified briefings and I'm not a member of the intelligence committee, and um, I'm just unable to give you any comment on it.

In January, Sen. L asked Jeff for answers to written questions. “Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?” Sen L wrote.

Jeff responded with one word: “No.”

The first paragraph was left out of the article deceptively. It changes the meaning of the conversation.

The second quote from Sen. L. "about the 2016 election". He didn't ask if Sessions had met with an Ambassador while performing his Senate duties.

Throw shit at the wall. Hope something sticks.

earlweaver 329 reads

posted 9 years ago

6 / 36

more gibberish - or you can provide proof to prove me wrong? won't happen! LOL eom

END OF MESSAGE

earlweaver 283 reads

posted 9 years ago

7 / 36

and a special guest appeareance by Obama

as Putin's little bear cub

making the film XXX rated for gay porn!

Barack's opening a NMBLA franchise in Moscow!

they left Hillary out

Chelsea was her stunt double for the sex scenes

Hillary's thang healed! LOL

nuguy46 223 reads

posted 9 years ago

8 / 36

Which lie is worse?

Sessions? or

Obama saying you can keep your plan and your doctor?
Financially no harm w/ Sessions...can't say same for Obama's.

bigguy30 301 reads

posted 9 years ago

9 / 36

AG Jeff Sessions on former President Bill Clinton lying under oath back in 1999.

Posted By: earlweaver

earlweaver 227 reads

posted 9 years ago

10 / 36

lil boy OBAMA!!! Putin's = bitch! LOL eom

END OF MESSAGE

TwoMints 338 reads

posted 9 years ago

11 / 36

Re: They asked the other members of the committee

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5x3pll/claire_mccaskill_says_she_has_never_had_a_call_or/

Redpill incoming.

Posted By: Laffy

if they met with the Ruskie too and, so far, all of them have said no.

So, why did just Traitor Trump's poodle meet with him?

Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, drip.........

JackDunphy 197 reads

posted 9 years ago

12 / 36

LOL. Dem hypocrisy running wild again.

The talking heads on CNN are already backing down and saying most likely all Sessions will need to do is recuse himself. BFD.

Of course to the children here who have to sit at the kids table for all the holidays, this is a scandal of EPIC PROPORTIONS! lol

Lets see how it plays out but it seems like a nothing burger re: illegality as it is perfectly lawful for Sessions to have met with the ambassador and that he was meeting the Russians as a member of the U.S. government and not on behalf of DJT.

mattradd 40 Reviews 263 reads

posted 9 years ago

13 / 36

Hmmm! And, you accuse me of looking down my nose!

"Of course to the children here who have to sit at the kids table for all the holidays, this is a scandal of EPIC PROPORTIONS! lol"

Hypocrite!

JackDunphy 335 reads

posted 9 years ago

14 / 36

I was referring to Taffy but funny how you would take offense.

Funny, but not surprising, as you have your nose so far up his ass when he opens his mouth I can see...you. LOL

mattradd 40 Reviews 319 reads

posted 9 years ago

15 / 36

Perhaps you may want to reconsider your response!

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=302398&boardID=39&page=1#302398

It seems quite clear you are referring to me!

ed2000 31 Reviews 245 reads

posted 9 years ago

16 / 36

Except it's more fake news. . . .

Other Washington Post reporters are now stating this is all partisan intentional distortions of reality.

mattradd 40 Reviews 304 reads

posted 9 years ago

17 / 36

And, you have a link, right? eom

END OF MESSAGE

JackDunphy 291 reads

posted 9 years ago

18 / 36

So you are crying about a post from a DIFFERENT thread on a DIFFERENT day?

Butt hurt much? LOL

Come on Matt. Find the big boy pants and put them on, will ya?

hwy2heaven 169 Reviews 296 reads

posted 9 years ago

19 / 36

Re: and a special guest appeareance by Obama

You really need some serious psychiatric help!

hwy2heaven 169 Reviews 359 reads

posted 9 years ago

20 / 36

Re: lil boy OBAMA!!! Putin's = bitch! LOL eom

When you cannot dazzle with brilliance baffle the board with your bullshit! I like you neo cons for drifting away from the topic and bringing up Barack Obama.

Do you need to be reminded that Dump, Sessions and Conway are the only game in town.?

mattradd 40 Reviews 287 reads

posted 9 years ago

21 / 36

No, not crying! Just pointing out your hypocrisy!

I wasn't aware, that to do so, there was a rule that said I needed to point to evidence within a single thread on a single day!

Oh, wait! There isn't one!

P.S. If you had your big boy pants on, you'd be able to admit when you're wrong, when you have been a hypocrite, and you'd not need to use homosexual references in your posts!

hwy2heaven 169 Reviews 248 reads

posted 9 years ago

22 / 36

The Crow just gave a statement

The Crow just made a statement that it has full confidence in the Kettle! LOL. I thought Putin had scandalous pictures of Crow in Moscow, now it seems he has also scandalous pictures of the Kettle.

JackDunphy 222 reads

posted 9 years ago

23 / 36

Now you're all butt hurt about "homosexual references?"

Are you in need of a safe space? LOL

Now, go take the thread far to the right as you tend to do.

Who could stop you?

mattradd 40 Reviews 233 reads

posted 9 years ago

24 / 36

Just as I thought! You are not wearing big boy britches! Why am I not surprised?

eom

END OF MESSAGE

mattradd 40 Reviews 242 reads

posted 9 years ago

25 / 36

I suspect they're getting weary having to serve as...

Trump, and Trump administration apologists! I suspect it's beginning to take it's toll!

hwy2heaven 169 Reviews 285 reads

posted 9 years ago

26 / 36

Jim Crow recuses himself from Dump / Russia ties!

I am Guilty of talking to the Russians. Get a Special Prosecutor and send Jim Crow to Graeybar Hotel.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 327 reads

posted 9 years ago

27 / 36

You want proof? Sessions recused himself. It's gibberish to you...

...because you didn't get far enough in school to learn what "recuse" means. ROTFLMAO!!

borabora 15 Reviews 226 reads

posted 9 years ago

28 / 36

Another Russian spy?

Geez, this administration is so loaded with Russian spies 😡

-- Modified on 3/2/2017 2:30:04 PM

mattradd 40 Reviews 136 reads

posted 9 years ago

29 / 36

And, one more!

END OF MESSAGE

borabora 15 Reviews 262 reads

posted 9 years ago

30 / 36

I was under the impression that

..the Kushner boy works for Mossad.

He works for the KGB too?

A double-agent, huh?

Hpygolky 233 Reviews 401 reads

posted 9 years ago

31 / 36

The whole "you can keep your plan and your doctor" myth nonsense..

If you lost your doctor or plan then consider yourself lucky. It was probably because your doctor/plan/group didn't fall in line with the ACN guidelines. I lost my doctor and I was taken back by it, but my new doctor insisted on every 6 month of lap work, yearly physicals ( and his office follows through ) and when her first saw me, 5 years ago, he started a thorough check up on me, to start fresh. My new doctors was more into my health then my old one, so losing my old doctors was a blessing.
Doctors change group affiliation and companies need to be profitable....but there will always be a company that will take you on.

mattradd 40 Reviews 110 reads

posted 9 years ago

32 / 36

Oops! 2 more!

They're coming out of the woodwork!

hwy2heaven 169 Reviews 234 reads

posted 9 years ago

33 / 36

Release your Tax returs, you Dump.

It will be end of his short stay in the White House. The slaves who built the building never would have imagined that one day a traitor and a Russian Spy would one day occupy the building.

ed2000 31 Reviews 314 reads

posted 9 years ago

34 / 36

If the Senate Dems and FG want different answers they should learn to ask different questions. . .

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/03/02/could-sessions-face-perjury-charges-former-federal-prosecutors-think-not/?utm_term=.6cee3d0e763f

http://twitter.com/pbump/status/837371499325468672

2465305 70 Reviews 313 reads

posted 9 years ago

35 / 36

Re: The proof against the Liar-In-Chief is adding up!

So what.....as usual all you see is what the blinders you have on allow. Sessions could have talked with the Russians all he wanted as long as he did not discuss the ELECTION which all people like you are hoping. But then again HOPE is all you have to go on lately.....and of course your obsessive name calling, cutting and pasting and juvenile LOLs at the end of your posts.

Posted By: bigguy30

The British and Dutch provided the US with intelligence, showing Trump associates met with Russian goverment officials in European cities.

Posted By: TwoMints

Smalley: OK CNN has just published a story and I'm telling you this about a news story that's just been published, so I'm not expecting you to know, haha whether or not its true or not haha. CNN just published a story alleging the intelligence community provided documents to the president elect last week that included the information that quote "Russian operatives claimed to have comprising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump. These documents also allegedly say quote "there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government".

Smalley: Now again, I'm telling you this is a scummy (out?), so ya, know. But if it's true, but it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

JS I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians um, and I'm unable to comment on it.

Smalley: Without divulging sensitive information, do you know about this or what compromising personal and financial information the Russians claim to have?

JS allegations made about candidates get made about candidates all the time and they've been made about President Elect Trump alot sometimes, most of them, virtually all of them have been proven to be exaggerated or untrue. I would just say to you that I have no information about this matter. I have not been in on their classified briefings and I'm not a member of the intelligence committee, and um, I'm just unable to give you any comment on it.

In January, Sen. L asked Jeff for answers to written questions. “Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?” Sen L wrote.

Jeff responded with one word: “No.”

The first paragraph was left out of the article deceptively. It changes the meaning of the conversation.

The second quote from Sen. L. "about the 2016 election". He didn't ask if Sessions had met with an Ambassador while performing his Senate duties.

Throw shit at the wall. Hope something sticks.

2465305 70 Reviews 186 reads

posted 9 years ago

36 / 36

Re: Were you there?

Bwahahahaha.ho..w do you know they did?

Another one of BGs virus laden web sites?

Posted By: Laffy

How do you know they didn't talk about the campaign?