...but side-by-side with Bush he looked like a goddamn genius.  He may have failed, but he likely would have at least ATTEMPTED to end that disaster of a war in Iraq; which is turning out to be a much larger drain on this country's resources than anyone wants to acknowledge (doing so is unpatriotic).  As someone who also voted for the lesser of two evils in that election, I have to strongly disagree.  Bush 43 was much more of a disaster.  

that could have got me to stay home on Nov 4. There is no way I could vote for either Obama or Huckabee.

I am a little less optimistic about 2012, but I hope it's a better slate than we've had for the last three elections. It would be hard to do much worse. The libs are fond of saying that we couldn't do worse than Bush, I remember quite well the days of Jimmy Carter and that's proof that we could do much worse than Bush.

Obama will make us look back fondly on the "good ole days" of George W Bush.

Hell yes, I voted for Reagan (and I spelled his name right, too.)  And I proudly voted twice for President George W. Bush and, while I don't agree with everything he has done, I am very pleased with how he has kept our country safe.  He restored integrity and class to the Oval Office.  He has nothing to be ashamed of as he leaves office.

McCain was near the bottom of my list too.  But any Republican (except for that idiot Ron Paul) would be preferable to the junior Senator from Illinois.

Posted by Mister Red Baron  , 10/15/2008 7:45:34 PM   [Mister Red Baron has 18 reviews]

"in either election.  I have always considered him a mental midget.  Moreover, he strikes me as impulsive and ignorant.

To sum up, I have judged him as impulsive, ignorant and stupid.  My, what a combination."


Carter does fine building cheap no frills homes..
he's a good guy , just uninformed and not Presidential material...but thats the voters fault

and all in all except for his spending WAY too much money, not exercising the veto and trying too hard to get along with the Dems, I'd do it all over again.