This should stimulate some discussion

-- Modified on 12/27/2015 6:51:25 PM

http://climate.nasa.gov/

...weighed in on climate change.  You could have posted an article by any one of the 3% of scientists who deny the existence of climate change or that climate change is caused by humans.  Yet out of all the possible choices, you picked an adjunct professor at a junior college.  He can't even get tenure at a junior college - that's the best you could do?  Oh, and he couldn't get laid in a whorehouse with a fistful of hundreds

All you have is "shoot the messenger"?  He makes 10 points.  As I said I don't know if any or all of them are true.  But since you disagree, present some backup data to your point of view.

So where is your data to prove your points?
Since you disagree with him DUANE?
I love how people demand things.
They don't do themselves first.  Lol

Dimwit, they are not my points.  And the author describes his basis for his 10 points.  Is that beyond you?

So you started this thread smart guy.
Then you got a answer you disagree with from BP and demanded more data.
I wonder why you cannot do the same yourself?
Since you seem to doubt or question BP point.

and not a word claiming a correlation between CO2 and temperature change.  I did like the first point though, political leaders and actors think it is important!

Lock step Scientists blindly preaching the devout religion of Man made global warming, find employment and Government grants with little effort.
  When many  temperature sensors are located near Jet engine exhaust and asphalt areas, common sense should tell you,  global warming fanatics are spewing false data easily digested by  
  bamboozled sheep.  

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/scientists-earth-endangered-by-new-strain-of-fact-resistant-humans
 

I'm looking for the data, not just another story about what scientists believe.

is that 100 years out of 4.6 billion is way past meaningless.  In the 70's the same chicken-littles were terrified of and predicting the next ice-age - which is infinitely more terrifying.

And other cool staff of technological and industrial epoch..may then it be more convincing and why they calculate. CO levels for last hundred years?! Hah  
I wonder and why it is their not measured this gas in BC Era?  
And besides that I am very agree with you on other points

...DUANE responded to gatorjimmy's link of an Andy Borowitz column by referring to it as "just another story about what scientists believe."  It's obvious that DUANE has no sense of humor or the humor simply went over his head (or couldn't penetrate his thick skull).

I am not saying that it isn't happening but the scientists will tell you that they really don't know.  It is simply too complex a system for them to know really how climate works.  That's why it is so hard to predict the weather.

it says it all!

if you haven't listen to what Ivar has to say...........

actually the 97% consensus is nothing other than agreement that humans have SOME influence on climate change