Was reported over a week ago he was going to throw his name into the ring.
Commented that he won't win. Commented that I don't like him.
Nice try..... proving liberal stereotype correct.... name calling, LYING, etc. about two people on this board. He wont win and odds are wont get the nomination.
No wonder they love him. He's a completely nuts train wreck. But given Walz's negatives, he could actually win. And that will be the end of Minnesota.
Be careful what you wish for, boys...
This was posted a week ago
Try to keep up
No splooging on the right.
And you cannot…. CUM …to terms with that
And remember keep Christ in Christmas
She's upset I made a fool of her in her attempt to suck up to a certain new poster here. I can understands she must be enraged that I busted her for her lies, and failure makes her very cranky. But a person with even the tiniest brain would have taken a hiatus and licked her wounds. Instead, Felcher comes to me begging for more humiliation..
Suck up to a “certain poster”? You do not even have the decency to have the respect to use the lady’s name Katie.
You are the one who insulted, demeaned, ridiculed, disrespected, besmirched Katie and then in another thread you get on your hands and knees and grovel with publishing advice, and implying you have been published…..that’s fucking hilarious.
Yeah and let’s not forget you posting a photo of your felching partner in Black Face.
Enraged? Me? That's funny because
You are the poor pathetic degenerate who is groveling, making things up and doing a very poor job of trying to impress Katie and everyone here with your continuous vaunting, (about what you do not have and did not do and places did not go) because you are a social outcast and reject.
The only one you humiliate is yourself.
Then you say I should go on hiatus. After you have been trying for years to stab me in the back and get me banned and FAILED again and again you again beg me to go on hiatus. How pathetic
Oh I can hear it now, you ickypus crying out lie, liar, lying.
Shout it loud …scream and screech it …louder – louder I cannot hear you.
You overuse the word lie in all its forms to the extent that it has been rendered totally meaningless, when you say it.
You and your felching partner are the dregs of society.
Rant on
Rave on
Rage on
Your temper tantrums are fun to watch as you wiggle, squirm and twist in a desperate attempt 5o look relevant, important and the hero.
You do have all the symptoms, however, at your age you cannot …CUM …to terms with it.
http://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/9742-narcissistic-personality-disorder
Keep Christ in Christmas
-- Modified on 12/11/2025 5:56:51 PM
Not only that, he stole the "narcissist" mantra from a certain recently-banned poster and regurgitated it.
And since when did Katie ask Felcher to white knight for her? And she certainly didn't want him to LIE about it. Amazing Felcher even brings that story up again since Katie busted Felcher for lying (yes, LYING) about my use of BBC. When she went back and read the thread it was clear Felcher had LIED again and she apologized to me. Being a decent sort, I of course accepted that and gave her valuable advice. Which she appreciated.
All this has so enraged Felcher that she flounced off for a few days and is now presumably sulking in her miserable, solitary room, fuming at the television.
And Felcher is echoing the recently banned poster by falsely accusing me of trying to her banned as well. Lie, upon lie, upon lie. So I now call out Felcher: prove your charge that I have tried to get you banned.
Put up or shut up, you lying weasel.
Oh, and while you're at it, prove you're NOT as old as BPS has proved.
We're waiting...
It is fun watching you fly of the handle and go out of control, in an irrational raging rant.
You claim I stole the “narcissist” ( a common word used by many here both left and right, banned and active posters maybe it was stolen from me) mantra from a certain banned poster. “A certain banned poster”, again not man enough to name the banned poster, so without the banned posters posts you give yourself a way out of being challenged to prove it.
However, since you claim that I first used the word “felcher” based on what you just said the only logical conclusion is you are indirectly admitting you stole it from me and use it more than anyone Which makes sense because you look up to me and admire me.
I didn’t address the rest of your ludicrous raving because you are poor wretch who is way too sensitive and emotionally weak to be dressed-down more.
I’d tell you to try to control your rage but don’t because it is really fun watching your tantrums and hissy fits.
BTW lots of posts missing lately
Keep Christ in Christmas
She also totally DUCKS my accusations about her earlier lies. Because she knows I'm RIGHT. She is reduced to feebly baiting me into naming a banned poster because she hopes to get me banned as well.
Welcher embarrasses herself AGAIN and is no doubt back in her cardboard box sobbing herself to sleep.
How utterly pathetic.
And weak.
Was reported over a week ago he was going to throw his name into the ring.
Commented that he won't win. Commented that I don't like him.
Nice try..... proving liberal stereotype correct.... name calling, LYING, etc. about two people on this board. He wont win and odds are wont get the nomination.
The story a week ago was, as you actually said, he was considering running. The announcement today is that he is ACTUALLY running. Do you two dopes comprehend the difference?
What a couple of dopes...
Funny you like to insult our intelligence.... when it really doesn't matter because we both said WE DONT CARE.
Your title of the post is saying we would care and insinuated we would vote for him. So again... spreading false info.
But keep the stereotype alive that you have to insult people.... it is the liberal way.
And you WILL vote for him. You just won't admit it, hack.
-- Modified on 12/11/2025 5:47:43 PM
Not even close. But I have bought his MY Pillows.
What's your product review? I've read MANY negative reviews about the product (shredded styrofoam in a bag) and the lack of or abuse by customer service.
Not even close. But I have bought his MY Pillows.
So so.....
I order it before he went off the deep end. Went to the website and did the whole fill out the way you sleep, sized up, and what not.
Worked fine and no real complaints. But to me pillows only seem to last about 2 years then I get new ones. Now got some bamboo something or other got from Target. Seem ok so far.
You sob yourself to sleep into them every night.
Not helping with the stereotype are you.
Someone asked for a review...... I gave it and then you do this. Name call, insult, etc. Keep proving me correct.
If it was meant to be a "joke".... you might want to put in "joking" with your track record.
Also repetitive.
I thought Nicky's post was clever and funny, but it upset you. Poor baby. You may be too sensitive or insecure to be posting on a board where you get pushback. Time to grow a pair.
I thought Nicky's post was clever and funny, but it upset you. Poor baby. You may be too sensitive or insecure to be posting on a board where you get pushback. Time to grow a pair.
Says the person whose opinions consist of posting insults. Your opinions mean shit.
As you can see I am not. I am still here. Proving that i have a back bone and it doesn't bother me. It honestly doesn't.
I just keep proving the point liberals resort to name calling when they don't have any substance or can't back up their arguments.
But you two keep proving this stereotype correct. Thanks.
It's only proves a faux stereotype in your disjointed mind. Your posts are word salads of inconcruent thoughts that you repeat and stubbornly clutch onto. No wonder the more you post, the more you are considered just another garrulous partisan baffoon. But keep telling your stories to your MAGA buddies at the end of bar. I bet they just sop up your every word and grievance.
HA HA HA HA.....
Funny that you and other Liberals on here are the first to bully and name call. You want discussion but once your "ideas" are pushed back against or prove wrong or LIES. You are the first to insult, name call, move goal posts, etc. Just like I keep "REPEATING".... stereotypical liberal.
You call my posts "word salads".... I just want to talk liberal so you can understand just like Kamal speeches. 
(yes a joke)
But many of you want to just BLAME TRUMP for anything that you and others ignore facts, stats, data, truth, patterns, etc. Prime example.....The whole "affordability" issues being talked about now...... you honestly want to know which states are not "affordable"..... BLUE RUN STATES... go look up the data. It is out there. Then you want to always talk "tariffs" (and you know that is my sticking point) .... look at "blue" states and the laws.... min wage, taxes, insurance, rents, permits, licensing, etc. MAJOR FACTORS in expenses for businesses. More facts, data, stats, etc. liberals want to IGNORE. But I digress.
Yes, you digress. You deflect. You distract. You're all over the place. You stubbornly hold on to every inane argument. We blame trump for what he says and does while you blindly defend him with foolishness. Your so called facts, stats, truths, patterns are bullshit. Your affordability issue is a prime example of your nonsense. The entire country is suffering from an affordability crisis brought on by your dear leader fucking up our economy. Red states are as affected as Blue states. If it's so horrible in Blue states why do Blue states consistently poll the highest in quality of life and, because our incomes are higher, subsidize Red states through our greater federal income taxes?
Affordability.....Really..... gas prices? STATE Taxes? Property Taxes? Rents? Housing? etc. Facts don't LIE.
The top 10 least affordable states:
1. CA
2. NJ
3. HI
4. MA
5. WA
6. NY
7.FL
8. CO
9. NH
10. MD
11. CT
12. OR
From that list..... ALL ARE BLUE EXCEPT FL..... I will also say throw out HI because of location and what it costs to get "supplies" to the islands.
You bring up SUBSIDIZING.... that doesn't mean shit for "affordability". Blue states have great population hence more federal income taxes.
Top 15 population:
1. CA
2. TX
3. FL
4. NY
5. PA
6. IL
7. OH
8. GA
9. NC
10. MI
11. NJ
12. VA
13. WA
14. AZ
15. TN
5 of the 15 are RED, 2 are "purple" and rest are BLUE. With CA, NY, and PA... having 17M more people than TX and FL combined. So yeah.... FEDERAL taxes get distributed. Again....more FACTS you want to ignore when talking about taxes, distributions, etc. Just like low population states do get "subsidies" because of the fact they have lower populations.
I'll try again to explain. I think you are confused.
Blue states have always had a higher cost of living than Red states. For example, housing is more expensive in Blue states. People in Blue states are generally better educated and have higher earnings than people in Red states. We pay more in local taxes and fees and receive more in services and benefits from our towns, cities, and states.
We also pay more federal taxes per capita and receive a lower, disproportionate amount back from the federal government. Blue states subsidize Red states because we get less back than we pay in. Red states get more federal money than they pay in taxes. This fact has nothing to do with the population of the state. It has everything to do with Blue states paying in more than we get back.
You are confusing cost of living with today's affordability crisis. The worsening affordability problem that exists in both Blue states and Red states has to do with rising inflation primarily due to tariffs, rising health care (that's about to get even worse), a weakening job market, and low wage growth in middle-income and low-income families.
COST OF LIVING IS AFFORDABILITY..... If you can't afford the cost of living in an area it isn't AFFORDABLE.
Population of the States has everything to do with TAXES and what federal funding they get, don't get, etc. Hence why red states get more money because they don't have the population to help pay for certain things.
You are also ignoring that many of the "subsidies" are also farm related when it comes to figuring out federal funding in states. especially when media and liberals wants to throw out numbers without context. So bigger agriculture states get higher subsidies or federal funding. CA is a huge state for AG but that is off set by the taxes on the tech sector. Where as your states of SD, ND, KS, etc.... have low population, big farm economies and not bigger industry to offset things.
What that means is..... AS AN EXAMPLE NUMBERS ARE NOT CORRECT.....CA can say we pay in $2B in taxes to the FED but only receive $1.5B in subsidies with $1B of that going to farmers. Because of the tech sector paying in taxes. Where as SD, ND, KS, etc... would pay in $500M in taxes but receive $600M in subsidies with $400M of that going to farmers. The farm community gets huge subsidies. This will show that "red states" take in more than they produce yet most of it is going back to FARMERS which is controlled by the feds. It shows going to 1 group.
Again this is just example of how it works. Crop insurance is a federal run program. So any payments for lost production, hailed out, drought, etc... gets SUBSIDISED or paid by the fed. You can be a shitty farmer and have a perfect growing season. But your yield is less than what you bought for insurance.... YOU GET PAID. These are FACTS. It is showing you how numbers are skewed.
I am not saying Red States don't take in more than they produce in taxes. I am saying you need to look at the numbers and where the money is going. Some states the money is going for social benefit programs that are not AG related. Be it SNAP, Housing, Education, Welfare, etc. Again... based on population, taxable population, taxable income in the state, etc.
When you stated POPULATION doesn't matter.... you are showing ignorance. Population is showing a tax base... be it income, sales, gas, property, rental, etc. higher population is more people to TAX. Which all off sets what States get back from the FED. Higher gas taxes in states means more money for roads and less money asked for from the Fed. Higher population sale tax means more sales. More income brought in because of sales... less money needed from the FED. So population is a driving factor. Same goes for Property taxes.....which typically is your driving factor with education/schools. Higher populations typically means higher cost of homes/rents which means higher property values.....more value means more tax collected.
Also there you go playing the stereotypical liberal.... WE ARE MORE EDUCATED/SMARTER THAN YOU..... really??? A degree doesn't mean you are educated or "smarter". It means you got a piece of paper for one field. In that one field you might be "smarter" or "educated". But the rest of it....people are not. I mean you are the one telling me Population has nothing to do with what States get back. Even in your reply stated.... more people = more taxes paid in. POPULATION MATTERS. Local services are paid for by....TAXES PAID IN BY LOCALS.... be it state, local, sales, property, etc taxes.
Anyways...... inflation isn't "rising" because of tariffs. Inflation rose because of printing of the US dollar, Government spending, and people not working during COVID. Inflation right now is at its about normal historic mark (3-4%)..... it was that way Biden's last year or so as well. "Inflation" prices don't just "come down" in a year.... it takes YEARS for them to come down if they ever do. That is the sad thing....especially when the Gov is forcing "higher wages" (fed/state min wages). It just keeps things higher priced. Which Government wants so they can tax it. Why do you think Trump is pushing so hard for lower interest rates.....he wants housing to stay HIGH. Which off sets federal tax funds needing to be spent because property taxes stay high.
Yada, yada, yada. Blah, blah, blah. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about yet that doesn't stop you from blathering on. Nine paragraphs of nonsense and to you it all makes sense. You should donate your brain to science so it's abnormal pathology can be studied by generations of neuroscientists. This board's former SPOAT is gone, but now a new SPOAT has emerged.
That endless, barely coherent post is nothing more than a stinking, festering pile of word-vomit.
Now watch him cry that we're being mean to him again.
If I were teaching an economics 101 class and he submitted that word-vomit on an exam, he would get an F and a referral for mental health counseling. He will also accuse me of insulting him and being a stereotypical liberal. Poor baby. However, after a couple of attempts to explain economics to him, there's nothing else to do except ridicule the nonsense that he is so very proud of.
Thank you for keep proving my point that you are the "bully" of the group.
You name call instead of actually talking about my post. He stated population doesn't mean anything.
Yet population means everything. Higher population means more state tax revenue. More state tax revenue means less dependent on federal tax money. More state tax revenue means you can provide more things for your state citizens.
Population means everything when you talk TAXES (revenue) for states. Be it sales tax, gas tax, income tax, property tax, etc.
Higher population also means that you collect more for the FED as well. So "pay in more".
ECONOMICS 101. But yeah.... just insult instead.
Sorry that your tender, snowflake feelings are so easily hurt, but I still grade you an F. I have previously addressed your so-called points that you keep repeating over and over. I find your so-called points rambling, weak, unconvincing, and devoid of relevance to the question of tariffs, the economy, and the affordability problem in America. You refuse to learn from my explanations and you continue to repeat yourself. I question if you are even capable of learning anything beyond the extreme right-wing propaganda that you have gorged on. At this point, all I can do is point out the inadequacy and foolishness of your thinking. Now I will ignore you.
Liberal being a bully.
Yet ignores that when State taxes bring in more money that means they need less money from the Fed. When state taxes bring in more money they can provide more benefits for the citizens of that state. So populations is a driving factor.
More people = more income to tax......ECONOMICS 101.
What are you, six?
Suck it up, Buttercup.
Affordability in STATES.....and taxes.
Which states have high state income taxes which drains house hold income. Which then hurts affordability.
How many of these are BLUE STATES? Which goes back to talking about how affordability is mainly in BLUE STATES. With Red States not seeing the "hurt" as much as the media and liberal politicians want you to believe.
You're like a dog with a bone. Worse. You won't let go of this incorrect conclusion even after being schooled many times. Taxes in Blue states are generally higher because incomes are higher and government provides more services to their citizens. If you don't want to pay more in taxes and get more services, move to a Red state. Red state citizens are less educated and poorer. Because Red state citizens are poorer they are more affected by the affordability crisis because the wages of middle-income and low-income people have not keep up with inflation that has worsened because of tariffs. The affordability crisis affects the entire country but more acutely in Red states that are poorer than Blue states.
Tax rates dont have nothing to do with it? GOT IT. Charging more has nothing to do with it.
I never said incomes are lower in blue states. I talked about higher tax rates, higher home values, sales tax, etc. Which means more money collected. Which means less money needed from the FED. you keep saying....but blue states take less. NO SHIT because they take in more in state taxes because of higher rates, higher population, higher property taxes, etc. Also in BLUE state it is higher rents, higher taxes, higher costs of living.... which means BLUE STATES ARE HAVING AFFORDABILITY ISSUES that some red states are not seeing. Can you wake the fuck up and see this. There are charts out there proving this. There is data out there proving this. Fuck go look at what the average rents, home prices, etc. MOST EXPENSIVE are typically in BLUE STATES. Look at gas prices.... most expensive are typically in BLUE STATES... look at tax rates.... BLUE STATES..... see the fucking pattern. All deal with AFFORDABILITY. Middle class are getting pinched in BLUE STATES because of the things i just mentioned.... higher gas prices, income taxes, rents, home prices, mortgages, insurance (see home prices), property taxes, utilities (fees added on because of "green"), etc. ALL IN BLUE FUCKING STATES.
But you want to ignore these facts. So again you want to say.... I WAS PROVEN WRONG. When in fact I wasn't and am not. You are just being ignorant to these facts.
I attached an article about 98 mayors sending letters to Gov Walz in MN talking about how State policy is hurting the affordability of Cities and the citizens. The policies are putting a "crunch" on budgets which trickle down to citizens. This is happening ALL OVER THE COUNTRY. The article points out the "fraud" but it isn't mainly the fraud hurting MN. That is just the headlines. The state has pushed many mandates onto local government, schools, business, etc. All of which is in tax increases and will kill many businesses, force schools to make cuts or have tax levies, cities to raise taxes or make cuts, etc. This same shit has happened all across the nation in the past 10+ years.
Your idea that affordability is a Blue state problem is 100% wrong. It affects everybody everywhere but especially middle-income and low-income people in all states. There are more middle-income and low-income people in Red states, consequently affordability is a greater problem in Red states. I don't know why you can't get that simple concept through your thick skull.
It is proportionally worse in BLUE STATES.... that is the fucking point. People are saying AFFORDABILITY is worse or a "crisis" in blue states. For all the reasons I have been listing. But you have been too ignorant to see that. That is why the liberals have switched to saying "affordability" on things. When you look at the numbers they are much worse in BLUE STATES than red.
The liberals are playing word games...ie: moving goal posts. BTW.... 3rd quarter of the economy numbers came out. way better than forecasted. CNN was reporting hard to spin the numbers on inflation a week ago. Yeah.... so "affordability" is still the buzz word being used. Yet people in red states are not feeling it like people in blue states. FOR THE REASONS WHY I LISTED.
But yeah.... keep ignoring the facts.
So I am wrong about high rent costs, high housing costs, high mortgages, high property taxes, high insurance rates, high state income tax rates, etc? All of which drives AFFORDABILITY for people. All of which eats into household income?
Attached is the highest cost of living per state. Throw out AK and HI since it is shipping that factors in. Which states are in the top 15.... Minus FL all BLUE or PURPLE states. If you want to look up rents many of those same states are in the top 10. Same with taxes. But yeah.... ignore the FACTS.
You must be trolling because you can't possibly be this stupid. I've been over this with you so many times but your ability and desire to comprehend are impaired. You don't get it. You'll never get it. Trying to educate someone as stubborn and closed/narrow-minded as you is impossible. Believe what you will. I'm sure I'm not the first one to tell you that you're an idiot.
Because you hump them just like Crackhead Mike does. Look at the expression on his face - he's cumming, and you know it!
I was waiting for this insult.....
But yeah.... keep it up
...it's TRUE...and you know it!!!
Unfortunately, that member doesn't know it. That's part of his problem. He's convinced that he is right. At least that's what all his MAGA buddies at the end of bar tell him. When he repeatedly posts the same stupid stuff, eventually someone, like me, is going to call him stupid. He thinks that's proof that liberals have lost the argument and are resorting to insults. A fool like him is incapable of learning, so the only way to deal with him is to insult or to ignore him. I'm finished trying to educate him because he's an incorrigible MAGA moron.
And then you feel the need to respond. Ya know you can ignore his post. I do that to you when I see its long winded. I mean who's got the time?
Oh you can ignore this...if you choose
No it is showing and proving that he is a TROLL and only can resort to name calling.
SEE Above post when I gave honest review on a product when someone asked about it.
Liberal stereotype being proven on a daily basis.
I really, really hope he wins. Righties deserve him.
http://www.businessinsider.com/cash-strapped-mypillow-mike-lindell-payday-loan-interest-usury-2024-12
Maybe Lindell can go to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and complain about the usurious rates.
.
Oh ... gutted and frozen by Trump, there basically is no CFPB anymore.
I really, really hope he wins. Righties deserve him.
http://www.businessinsider.com/cash-strapped-mypillow-mike-lindell-payday-loan-interest-usury-2024-12
...I'd vote for him over Tim Waltz. That said, and more times than once in here and in my private life, I'd like to see Dean Phillips primary Waltz for the governor's seat. If you don't know who he is, he was the MN member of congress that had the balls and the integrity to go against his party to primary biden and run as the democratic candidate against trump. He was an up and coming star until then and they ran him off because he didn't like to play identity politics and opposed the entirety of the insane woke mob.
...Like usual, he makes grand assumptions and once again is wrong. I posted a reply several days ago and he chooses to ignore it because it wasn't what he expected. Just another daily rake he went out of his way to stomp on.
Step on your own dick much?
...lately. It's just weird...
if you didn't keep stepping on it.