You've gotta wonder if Trump is watching this to see if it's a blueprint for his own moves later on. Like right before he's supposed to leave office. Or any time Congress doesn't do what he wants.

But the Korean National Police have surrounded the parliament building.

"The South Korean act on martial law states that if the assembly demands an end to it, the president must lift it 'without delay.'"
But the President has defied that. So it depends on what the military does. If we had the same situation in this country I think a signifiant number of generals would refuse to submit to an illegal order. But that does not seem to be the case (yet) in South Korea.
The other big question is what, if anything, Kim Jong Un does.

Something like this can’t happen. No Army ever devised could take out 150 million gun owners. No country is more protected against tyranny than the USA.

The "150 million gun owners" are largely Trump supporters. They are also useless, being fat, out-of-shape beer guzzlers. I'm probably one of a very few liberal gun owners.

Here are the latest developments, from the NYU Times.

Trump didn't try "to. become a tyrant" in "the first go round?"'
What the fuck do you think Jan. 6 was? It was a failed coup, dimwit. He failed because he was incompetent. Now he and those around him know how to get it right.
And have you done any research on how martial law works in the US compared to South Korea?
In the latter country, a declaration of martial law can be over-ridden by the legislature.
Not here. All the President has to do is declare it and there's no recourse at all.
Then there's Trump's worship of "strongmen" like Orban, Xi, Putin, Un and Erdogan.
He's a dictator wannabe.
And you don't care, you Red Goo-chugging, anti-democratic, traitorous moron.
And fake.

Then why wasn’t Trump arrested, charged with insurrection and jailed? Riddle me that idiot man.

But Trump's delaying tactics worked and his hole card did, too, i.e. winning the Presidency which caused Smith to have to drop the cases. So Trump dodged a conviction for insurrection. What a guy.
And Loooooser, as usual, knows no facts and hates the ones he sees.

Show me, where Jack Smith had an indictmentfor the charge of insurrection against Donald J Trump…

"conspiracy to defraud the United States,  
conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding,  
obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding,  
and conspiracy against rights.'
Is in context the textbook DEFINITION of an insurrection. But you are too stupid to know that.

The voters knew it was bullshit and that’s why they re-elected Trump. Now Biden is looking to pardon every Democrat under moon to protect them from the monumental amount of law breaking and corruption they did on his behalf.

is EXACTLY what happened on Jan. 6. Why Garland/Smith did not resort to it is puzzling.
Sorry, not sorry you're so out of touch with reality.

He made a guess, at best. Garland was renowned for his caution. He waited so long to get things moving against Trump's Jan. 6 plot he played right into Trump's hands. Trump should give Garland a medal.

I’m going to play along with Nicky’s hypothesis here, that there were DOJ lawyers on Smith’s team that believed they had enough evidence to charge insurrection. That there were attorneys and investigators pushing for insurrection charges.

Homey don't play dat.

Dude, you’re the one saying it was an insurrection but Garland/Smith too timid too charge.  I’m asking why timid? Legal considerations? Political considerations? Both?

You are starting to sound like the REAL Officer Carmen with you demands that I answer every hypothetical question of yours. Stop playing Board Cop.

And gets caught daily.

You’re complaining about hypotheticals?
Fact: Trump wasn’t charged with insurrection.
Nicky’s hypothetical: Because Garland/Smith were timid.
My question (not a demand 🤣): What considerations do you think made them timid? Legal? Political?

Garland did not charge Trump with insurrection because he knew he didn’t have the evidence to convict be use it wasn’t Simple as that.

As for hypotheticals, I simply made a guess. And it was not in the form of a question to you, ChicKie. YOURS was.
Does ChicKie get the difference?
You righties seem to think you can come on here and demand we answer your questions. Good luck with that.
It seems you will continue to need help from our brain-damaged SPOAT.  
Sad.

That the 2 "reach around" buddies, TATL and bigP have their asses handed to them every single day by nearly everyone here.
What an embarrassment these two are. And they don't even know it... shame I tell ya. 😕

The SPOAT is the stupidest poster on this board and you are a close second.

I know a lot of gun owners, like myself - who know filthy maga traitors are fully complicit traitors to the USA

The filthy head maga traitor tried to get the delusional hoard of filthy maga traitors to 'hang Mike Pence'. REMEMBER?  

The head filthy maga traitor was arrested at least four times.  A few of them specifically for trying to overturn the 2020 election.  Don't worry, intelligent people know filthy maga traitors are delusional and dumb.  

What the fuck do filthy maga traitors to the USA think "SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY" is?  It's INSURRECTION only by a different name.  Fucking idiots.

These people are mentally challenged in so many ways. Not to mention morally challenged.

He is an overly-cautious man and has demonstrated that time and again.

I agree that Garland is timid. Where I differ with you is whether or not the timidity in this instance gives insight into whether the prosecution believed they had evidence to move forward with an insurrection charge.

"lawfare." Another made-up righty term for something that doesn't exist.
*rubs ChicKie on his tummy*