I didn't deny that it did not contribute to the deficit.  It is a fact. My point is that every time the Dems complain about what the GOP did to increase the deficit they point to this.  

The "killing puppies" was an attempt at irony.  They use this as a "Look what Bush did."  As if it is something bad that he should not have done.  If it is something he should have done, don't harp about it.  

My point was for any Dems to complain about unfunded social programs is a joke.

stay anonymous....

I addressed specific points that the article made. The expense of wars, etc.

The "facts" that you think are missing are from the article. The article says that was the amount spent on the wars.  The "fact" of the cost of the stimulus is common knowledge.  

Either you are denying the very thing you post or you have are ignoring reality.

Of course, other than say I don't gave "data" you do not address one specific thing I said.
Do you deny that was the cost of the wars? Do you deny Bush inherited a recession?  Do you need a citation to prove the Tech Bubble Burst?  

You can't point to one thing that you can refute, and then you just say I am drinking Kool-Aid. Who liberal.

Commone Anon.  What one fact are you denying?  

Brownnosing, again, Quad ?

Btw, as evidenced by your current posting, your syntax stinks. Pick up a copy of "Elements of Style".  And while you're at it, dispense with your chickenshit aliases.

Phil is from So. Cal., NOT the south.

Btw, you shouldn't talk about someone "sticking their head in the muck"

Idiot.

I am not Souther, but I really like the south oral tradition.  

There are a handful of cultures that have great speaking/writing traditons.  The South is one, maybe because they got so many Irish.

Don't have time to respond to all, so I will go for low hanging.

I am still talking about weatherization because we are still paying for it.

Okay. I won't mentione weatherization.  How about solar panels for $500,000,000.  Ooopsie Daisy

Would you like me to switch to a 45 billion dollar train between corcoran and concord that is already 10 billion over original estimates and a route isn't fixed yet.

Also, I love "The Great Recession."  they tag on an adjective and everyone adopts it.  IT wasn't that worse than the one Reagan inherited in terms of unemployment, inflation, interest rates etc.  

The total cost of the War on Terrorism is more than just the two wars. But maybe you would not have us beef up airport security or try to monitor terrorism.  

In any event, no matter how you cut it.  Obama spent more in one year that all of Bush's wars combined.

Finally, to say Bush made it worse if funny.  He didn 't create the housing bubble. In 2003 he tried to put limits of Freddie and Fannie, but people like Dodd and Schumer kept screaming it was healthy.
And to say he made it worse.....

I said I was not enamoured by TARP, but you ignored the fact that Obama was 100% behind it, as were almost all Dems.  But it is Bush's fault.  

sites  and had you even read the article first ,which is very thought out based on actual gov and CBO data , you may not have spouted off nonsense which makes you look like even more of a fool  

The left just loves to call names and attack.

The funniest thing is you accuse him of referring to biased citations.  This is a perfect ad hominem attack - attack the source without saying why the facts are wrong.  

Even a biased source, right or left, can tell the truth.

Indeed, in England and other places it is assumed papers have a bias.  If you want to attack what they say, you have to do more than say, "The Times said...." or "The Guardian said...."
You have to say why it is wrong.

We could play your game all day and discredit things when every any cites the NY Times, which is a self-admitted liberal publication according to their own ombudsman.  The same for Huff Post, or anything else.

All you do is have six insults in the first three sentences and don't point to one false statement.

Here the data for fiscal year ending in 1999:

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm

Notice the total debt was $5,656,270,901,615.43


Now here is the data for fiscal year ending in 2000:

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo5.htm

Notice the total debt was $5,674,178,209,886.86

This was the smallest annual growth in the debt during the Clinton years. Notice that it GREW and did not shrink? Close to balanced but not.

For leaders who can be less than honest, one person bragged about the fact that he was able to mislead people.

Obama once said that he is a blank screen on which people project what they want to see.  That is amazing. It is saying that people don't know what they see when they see him, and he was PROUD of that fact.  (How else would you interpret it?  Oooops. I forgot. You  don't respond to specifics. Only say I am a wingnut.)

As to leaders misleading, how about spending hundreds of billions of dollars on "Shovel ready" projects, only to find that they weren't really shovel ready, the ver reason that the stimulus was passed.

Or how about, "I will go through every dime and see that none is wasted and Joe Biden is going to over see and and no one gets by Joe."
No one except Solyndra and another 100 billlion.

You will be paying for all the waste that slipped by Joe.  And you say I am eating crap.

Or how about "and no illegal alien will be eligible for any healthcare benefits......"  (Someone was censured for saying that was a lie.)

You want more crap that you eat?