Maher even stands up for Christians, to Rose's dismay.

the camera lens. Bloody fucking apologist.

I'm not saying that SW want work as a SW, I'm not saying they don't.  

Charlie didn't sound too thrilled with Bill's opinion. In fact Rose challenged Bill to a surrogate debate with a moderate Muslim.

Hope, Charlie finds a moderate Muslim to debate Maher! That would one heck of a debate

Charlie Rose squeems throughout that segment with Maher. He is SO uncomfortable at the thought that Islam is a far different religion than any other.  

"You can't handle the truth!"     Note: Smiley face winking means what is being said is not to be taken as being serious or as an absolute declaration of reality. Just couldn't help myself from trying to be a little humorous.

... it's easier to say wants on your mind when is clear - Is that clear!

I'll have to take your word for it since I've never watched his show.  

easier than addressing any of my four points.  That's quite a stretch, taking everything I said, as evidence that I support Charlie Roses point of view.  

One does not need to agree with, sympathize with or even respect Christians in order to stand up for them in the context of this interview exchange.

Now, if you were a journalist, and in the past you've seemed to use your expertise or understanding in such matters as being superior to mine, you would have just stated a lie. I said: " I agree that he points out some significant differences between Muslims and Christians,..." That's not glossing over! That was the major issue of the discussion. So, saying such is a lie. The point is, I'm not critiquing Mahler, I'm critiquing you. A you're to blind to see it. Can "the truth" have, what you called an "exaggeration," and what I call a lie, in it? Not by my logic.

Glossing over does not mean "ignoring". You gave an obligatory acknowledgement and then spent the rest of your time attempting to obfuscate the obvious. Now in an attempt to extricate yourself you restate the obvious claiming it to be substantially different from my original assessment. Indeed, Rose's reaction and yours were similar enough. Rather than address the facts you simply attempt to discredit the person merely presenting them.

"There you go again!"

You've just crossed the line, for me, into WTSTRT!