Politics and Religion

it's all Bill Clintons fault
jack0116533 14 Reviews 2640 reads
posted

I know we just discussed this, but we need to make sure the Republicans among us - you dim-witted ones know who you are - don't forget.

When in danger, when in doubt, just remember, it's all Bill Clinton's fault.

Clinton Lied, People Died
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Posted 10/2/2006

War On Terror: The man in charge of the CIA's Osama bin Laden desk on Bill Clinton's watch says that despite the former president's finger-wagging, Clinton did not do all he could to get the man who spawned 9/11.

Michael Scheuer is a 22-year CIA veteran and was head of that agency's bin Laden unit from 1966 to 1999. In a follow-up to Clinton's volcanic interview the week earlier on "Fox News Sunday," FNS host Chris Wallace invited him as one of three counterterrorism experts to analyze the truthfulness of assertions made by the "wizard of 'is' " in defending his pre-9/11 actions, or lack thereof.

Wallace asked the former head of "Alec Station," who'd previously said the CIA gave Clinton eight to 10 shots at killing or capturing bin Laden, why the al-Qaida leader was never killed or captured.

Scheuer responded that Clinton was correct in saying he got closer to bin Laden than anyone. "But, of course, he always refused to pull the trigger," he added.

Clinton always seemed to have an excuse too, such as "one time (when) they were afraid to have shrapnel hit a mosque when they killed bin Laden."

On another occasion, the Clinton team felt compelled to warn the United Arab Emirates to recall its princes, who were on a hunting trip with bin Laden. Said Scheuer:

"Richard Clarke called the emirates and warned them they should get out of that area, which cost us the chance to kill him."

As for Clinton's claim that he "worked hard to try to kill" bin Laden and "authorized the finding for the CIA to kill him," Scheuer said that "we were never authorized, while I was chief of operations, to kill Osama bin Laden. In fact, Richard Clarke definitely told us we had no authorization to kill bin Laden."

Scheuer went on to say:

"Mr. Richard Clarke, Mr. Sandy Berger (and) President Clinton are lying about the opportunities they had to kill Osama bin Laden" and that "for him (Clinton) to get on television and say to the American people he did all he could is a flat lie, sir."

According to the man charged with finding bin Laden: "Men and women at the CIA risked their lives to provide occasions to kill a man we knew had declared war and had attacked America four or five times before 1998. We had plans that had been approved by the Joint Operations Command at Fort Bragg. We had opportunities, many opportunities to kill him."

According to the 9/11 Commission Report, on Dec. 4, 1999, the National Security Council's counterterrorism coordinator, Clarke, sent Berger a memo suggesting a strike in the last week of 1999 against al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan. But the commission found that "in the margin next to Clarke's suggestion to attack al-Qaida facilities in the week before Jan. 1, 2000, Berger wrote, 'No.' "

For each opportunity, the Clinton team had an excuse for failure, from collateral damage to American casualties to how the Muslim world might react to either success or failure.

One time, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright thought an attack on bin Laden might interfere with the Mideast peace process, claiming: "Bombing Muslims would not be helpful at this time."

As for Clinton's claim that the Bush administration "had eight months to try; they did not try (but) I tried," Scheuer observed:

"Mr. Clarke, Mr. Berger, Mr. Clinton did have opportunities that were delivered by the men and women of the CIA to kill Osama bin Laden," but in "the first eight months of the Bush administration there were no such opportunities."

The Clinton administration had the opportunity to mortally wound al-Qaida and kill or capture bin Laden. But it was worse than the gang that couldn't shoot straight. It was the gang that couldn't shoot at all.

Order your deposition today!!!  Can't think of what bullshit is best for your lies?  We have ghost turd writers standing by to help you lie, around the clock, 7/24!!   Let us do the lying, so you can do the cheating & stealing!!

tis thee who speak foul wind from thy flapping anus.....

Michael Scheuer is a 22-year CIA veteran and was head of that agency's bin Laden unit from 1966 to 1999.

LyingLibs are, as lying Libs do...

his credibility is zero.   Sorry.  Your choice, and you blew it out your ass.

Refer to my earlier post on Bushisms.  "We were never stay the course...the hardest part (of the president's job) is linking Iraq to terrorism.."

Talk about divorced from reality - you really expect anybody to believe anybody touching that shit?????

It is all clear now!!! Clinton was Osama left hand man!!! Actually it is not Ayman Al-Zawahiri but actually Clinton with beard in most of these videos with Osama!!! I can post you an article that Reagan (That fricking moron actor) had CIA trained Bin Laden and George Bush Sr. was the most ignorant president about the terrorism. George Bush SR. was running the CIA for 20+ years before becoming president and he did not go after Osama because one does not go after their business partner anyway!!! Shit, that would be very bad...:) You can probably counter all of that with Clinton and Monica BJ and would not accept the source because it is written by Newsweek and not Fox Network.

And when you get your head out of Kenneth Star Ass, can you please help us to connect Clinton to World War I and World War II? We already know that he dodged the draft and smoke pot during Vietnam war but his role in two world wars are not clear to us...

I am actually glad that we have you here as you are entertaining us with your delightlfully bright posts (like your party leaders). Reading your posts doesn't boil my blood or make me think that I have to really rebutt to an intelligent person who is talking about real issues here but it makes me rather scratch my head and ask myself "What is he taking?" Or as they used to say "Ignorance is a BLISS" which I think is more of your case...

-- Modified on 11/24/2006 6:30:53 AM

Snowman391710 reads

with the facts. What I find funny is that all you can do is spew hatred and insults, without anything to back up your side.

Typical emotional liberal...

BTW, someone phrased it best, with all the emotion you spew, you sound like Barbara Streisand. So from now on, let it be known throughout the board, we hereby dub ye, Babbs

...better be an emotional liberal rather than ignorant conservative...But I guess, that package comes together: Just can't sepearte the two from each other. I am talking about the ignorant and conservative package...

Last but not least, you came out of nowhere. So we thought of new name for you too...Your new name will be "Mini ME" since it seems that your are a side kick for Bill Kile.

Snowman391893 reads

to back up your arguments, just more emotion.

Thanks for so effectively providing the proof of my statements.

debating you people is like shooting fish in a barrel.

If you say so smarty....I wonder why is that everytime an issue comes up, you and like of you resort to Bill Clinton pants repeatedly...

Don't tell me!!! You model your style of arguements based on Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coutler, and like of them. By the way, how does one argue with one like of Limbaugh or Coutler?

Enough said, lets comparte the intellect of Clinton, Gore, JFK, versus Bush SR, Reagan, Nixon , Ford, Dan Quale, and the big idiot Bush Jr and I think you will find and answer on which group, the emotional Liberal or ignorant Conserbvative hold the higher IQ. Execuse us for having Carter in our camp....

-- Modified on 11/24/2006 3:33:05 PM

Snowman391576 reads

if you want to boil it down to an intellectual argument, GWB had better grades than Kerry did at Yale.

And Al Gore flunked out of seminary school (how the hell do you flunk GOD 101?)

RightwingUnderground1773 reads

You know that it's not even a debate. Since when is "You're an idiot" a valid debating tactic?

That's where most of them end up, usually after their 2nd or 3rd point, except for Asianport. He leads with "You're an idiot/moron".

it's relly pretty simple:  you want me to believe something, you show me you have no connection with it.

Ask the lawyers, everything except a birth certificate comes down to who you believe.   The Republiscum just lie too much, it's not worth investigating this particular fellow anymore.

So we're just gonna label all of you what you are, closet fags.

RightwingUnderground2328 reads

the most credible CIA/anti-terror agent that has ever spoken out. There are probably those that are more credible, but they have not yet opened their mouths.

Register Now!