Write Review
1,979,307 Total Reviews 4,218 New Reviews
10,537 Users Online

Politics and Religion

Just as long as they are not “engaged in combat” on U.S. soil....
Timbow 468 reads
posted







   Dear Senator Paul:

   It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: "Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?" The answer to that question is no.

   Sincerely,

   Eric Holder
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/holders-letter-rand-paul-no-us-cant-use-drone-kill-citizen-not-engaged-combat-us-soil_706587.html

Madison_Ohare2386 reads

The ACLU and several democrats and republicans.  Who is not?  Linday Graham and John McCain!  They need to retire and what is wrong with the GOP, trying their hardest to fuck up the GOP again with a Jeb Bush in office.


"When true liberals that care about civil rights and civil liberties and the Tea Party conservatives who fight for the Constitution and our inalienable rights realize they are virtually fighting the same battle, there will be a great realignment of the political landscape.

This realignment will create the most powerful force for liberty the world has ever known.

For this to occur however, the Tea Party conservatives must leave the comfort of the crony country club of the GOP and liberals must be willing to walk away from the crony corporatists of the Democrat Party, including it's leader Barack Obama." Judge Andrew Napolitano

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u431 reads

...but on this, he's not. The War on Terror is over. It's time to put the genie back into the bottle. We've got to scale back executive power and uphold the Constitution. When the President claims the right to blatantly violate Due Process of Law, then something is seriously wrong. No American on US soil should ever face death from above under any circumstances. Everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until found guilty in a court of law. It's time for this shit to end.

ReplyQuoteReport
Timbow469 reads







   Dear Senator Paul:

   It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: "Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?" The answer to that question is no.

   Sincerely,

   Eric Holder
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/holders-letter-rand-paul-no-us-cant-use-drone-kill-citizen-not-engaged-combat-us-soil_706587.html

ReplyQuoteReport
Madison_Ohare456 reads

wording, not in combat.  In combat with who?  they are the ones buying up the aminution, trying their damnest to take gun rights, and stock piling coffins.  I told you awhile back they are stock piling coffins in Madison Ga.  and you didn't believe me when I said the land is being leased by the CDC.  Do you believe me now?  That they are using goverment agencies like Social Security to buy the amminution?  They are either expecting civil unrest, or want it to happen.  

Obama is dangerous, but he is not doing all of this alone!  John McCain is a very, very dangerous man too.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky46472 reads

Not by a long shot.  As to the rest, I agree with you.  Rand Paul is an asshole, but he's right to question the domestic drone policy.  And he should be questioning the Patriot Act (an ironic name only a politico could have coined), which Obama is responsible for making even stronger than Bush did.  McCain and Graham are two of the biggest weasels in the humorously dubbed "Greatest Deliberative Body in the World."  What a fucking joke.
But the world is rife with terrorists.  Especially in the Middle East.  We need drones over there because we can't put boots on the ground everywhere to go after them.  The only reason you can vapor about the War on Terror being over is because the Bad Guys are so busy trying to hide from drones they don't have much time to plan and carry out complex attacks.  Even so, there are enough of them to pull of the attack on the gas plant in Algeria a month or so a go that killed dozens, including some Americans.  But perhaps you missed that one.
So eat this!  Fucker!

ReplyQuoteReport
followme465 reads

I agree with the terrorist part of your post.

Also I still maintain that with some training and guidance you could be a good conservative.


Thank you
2013 = 28

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky46453 reads

I maintain that, with years of re-training plus many psychotropic drugs, you could become a barely acceptable Liberal.  Come to the Dark Side!  But if you can't look at decades of flip-flops by McCain and Graham and see that they are weasels of the first order, then there is no hope for you.  Glad you enjoyed the Kool Ade!  LOL!
2013=28 (probably not, but one can hope).

ReplyQuoteReport
followme418 reads


"When the President claims the right to blatantly violate Due Process of Law, then something is seriously wrong."

You fucking voted for him.


You're Welcome
GOP = For God and Country

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u436 reads

...I only vote for humans....

-- Modified on 3/7/2013 7:16:06 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
Snowman39430 reads

They have lost site of what conservative values are and have been to compromised by inside the beltway mentality.

The party is ready to move in a different direction and they are just in the way.

ReplyQuoteReport
Madison_Ohare453 reads

Have a beautiful weekend.

ReplyQuoteReport
anonymousfun504 reads

directed solely at idiots who doesn’t know shit about the constitution starting with constitution itself. The Supreme Court has the authority to declare any law passed by anywhere in this land constitutional or not. It is in the constitution idiots.

Natural born citizens know very little about the constitution compared to naturalized citizens. Because, one has to learn and the other believes they know it because of their birth.

If Rand Paul didn’t know, CIA cannot operate within the borders of United States and the President cannot declare war on his own, he needs to resign. Only Congress has the authority to declare war. Politically astute move to placate ignorance tea party yes, substantive stand, absolutely not.

Suggest you take some time reading the constitution, it is available on line instead of repeating what you hear on Fox News.

By the way Fox owned WSJ took Rand Paul to task over this and basically told him to go read the constitution.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!