Yes. I think I recall you mentioning her before.

I REALLY hope she does it. She can pick any running mate.

and start a new party... that'll really f- everyone up

Mr. Knowledge (for today),  

that being a crusader and supporting an outside that has little chance of winning amounted to wasting my vote, but it's an epiphany I had to realize on my own, so I applaud you for having the courage to stick to your guns under such circumstances.  It shows integrity and an unwillingness to compromise your principles in the face of a stark reality.  

And I have a feeling trump will endorse and push Ivanka to run...my feeling
Trump doesn't like any of those candidate you mentioned...Vance is quietly against the war and he's VP because Thiel and Don Jr pushed Vance on trump for the Money. Look at way he's being jerked around with the negotiating of this war. It isn't by accident
Trump never forgave Rubio for his "little hands " remark...don't think for a second he forgot that. He despises Rubio and clowns him when he can
And DeSantis was his enemy during the 2024 campaigner...trump hold grudges
Trump want to keep in the the family.

CDL,

Because CDL is on the record as favoring slavery. Just ask BP.  He's so old he was actually around during the Civil War.

Here I was, rushing to say that I was right, and you had to split my side laughing. Like I literally have a stitch from laughing!  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰

to ANYTHING I have ever said that remotely suggests that.  Another example of "When Dems don't have a substantive argument, they attack and lie.  It's a shame you have degraded yourself in your later years.

Actually, I STILL say this to GaG...
Were you born without a sense of humor or did you have it surgically removed?

by reputation.  We actually never met.  Had I had the opportunity to give him some advice, I would have told him to either man up or sell what remained of the Union back to Great Britain and use the money to go see some plays in London, not here.  

It's funny because WE know that. LOL. Are you being sarcastic? I can't tell. Not enough coffee yet...

You raised a really interesting question, and it is one I will probably keep thinking about: should the Union have just let the Confederacy secede? On one hand, the North had major advantages. It had more industry, more money, more transportation networks, and a stronger economic base. The Confederacy may have eventually collapsed on its own because its economy was so dependent on slavery and plantation agriculture.

First, there's no evidence slavery would have simply petered out without a war. The South existed on revenues from the sale of cotton, mainly to England.  Before the invention of the cotton gin in 1794 the production of cotton was inefficient. But once it was introduced as a quick and cheap was to remove seeds from cotton, profits rose and slavery became an effective way to operate.
As for Reconstruction it actually DID continue under Andrew Johnson and even U.S. Grant. It did not end until 1877 when Pres. Hayes agreed to end it as part of a compromise resulting from the contested election of 1876.
But there is no doubt you are correct we are still dealing with "the unfinished business of Reconstruction." And, in fact, we are still dealing with the unfinished business of "the 3/5ths compromise" in the Constitutional Convention in 1787. That was the proverbial "deal with the devil" the Founding Fathers (many of them slaveholders) made, which was the price of the creation of the United States.

It doesn't matter. I don't think I can make this into a bit. JUST the chance that slavery would still be going on bothers me.  

he wasn't Lincoln. He did not support Reconstruction as diligently as Lincoln probably would have and was generally weak. Hayes avoided it because Reconstruction at that point had been going on for more than ten years and people were just tired of it. Tired of fighting the Southern States relentless efforts to battle to regain control of their state governments. In effect, the South lost the war but won the peace.

We can add JB to the list. I don’t think any other P&R libs will be joining you in that support though.

You’ll know if and when she gets more involved with the WH
And I hear Rubio might be on the way out

a formidable first lady.  Lol

Because daddy sure doesn’t have the cards  
But Just saying .,,, ask yourself why, Ivanka in China ??

Ivanka’s personal net worth has been estimated between $100M-$300M. A good portion of that comes from product lines that are made in China.

You actually think China is afraid of her pulling her products from China?? What’s her volume? 100M? 50M??…, c’mon man
And what happened to the Made In America USA USA RAH RAH RAH.,.. you guys scream about

What makes you think about Ivanka pulling out of China? You asked why she went, and I pointed out she’s got significant business interests there. That’s all.

involved splitting a case of whiskey four ways.  The learning never stops here.  

Recent post: http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/re-shoes-on-the-other-foot-now-484230
"... The US Constitution calls for the ENUMERATION OF PERSONS without regard to citizenship ... and that's how the census was conducted since Day 1. [Article 1...  three fifths of all other persons.]