In a previous post you said, "There was, is, and remains undisputed evidence of links between al Quaeda and Iraq."
 
   Would you please be so kind and put up links and statements to govt officials, intelligence officials, or elected officials who have cited such unequovical and indisputed proof to validate your statement.  

The 9/11 Commission Report discusses the links, but notes that there was no evidence of Iraqi complicity in 9/11.

Plus, Iraq had numerous links to terrorist groups, and made cash payments to families of Israeli homicide bombers.

As for links?  I've got better things to do than keep or post a list of links for a crowd which is, to a man and woman, uninterested in being persuaded of anything (see my post of a few weeks ago, asking who is actually undecided (and no, I don't have a link to it)).

Some people have not, but are smart enough not to go for the bait that you laid out.  For me, even when, after, I make up my mind, you will not know who I plan to vote for.  You may speculate, but you could very well end up being dead wrong on your speculation.
    On the issue of links.  If you are going to make powerful assertions then, as far as I am concerned, you are obligated to buttress them with facts that support your arguments.  You are a lawyer, you should understand this completely.

  You made such a bold and powerful assertion about unequovical and undeniable proof to support the notion that al-qaida and Iraq had ties.  
   Maybe Im uninformed, or maybe from all the news accounts on tv and the internet I happened to missed something.  Maybe you have access to intelligence reports that the rest of the world doesn't have.  
   Or maybe you are actually the one who no matter what the evidence says, will always believe the horse shit you have been spoonfed by the RNC.

I am a lawyer.  And one of the first things you learn as a lawyer is to not waste too much time trying to persuade a biased tribunal.

And why bother trying to persuade you Kerry Kool-Aid drinkers of anything?  The idiot you support complained just last night about being "misled" into war ... referring to statements about WMDs by the Administration which he himself was parroting before his overweening ambition caused him to reverse himself.

It comes from relying upon biased headlines rather than the actual report.  Here's your reference: "The 9/11 Commission Report."  But since you offer no proof that Iraq had no al-Qaeda ties, spare us the moral superiority simply because I'm not taking your bait.

He's a lawyer?  No way.  I was guessing an entrepreneur.  How can you get a law degree without knowing ANY world history or political science?  And most lawyers I know can understand their opposition- they just disagree.  JimmieIQ can't fathom the Dems view, let alone debate it.

I think you are mistaken.  I say he's a  business man who was born on third and thinks he hit that triple.... Thank you Molly Ivins!

The only briefs he knows come off when she says "get comfortable"!

I do not know much about his politics other than he is a rightist on the board.  But, he seems to be clueless when reading information and coming to conclusions, so here is one guy that will never hire that particular advocate

  Like yourself, I see right through the phony Kerry and agree with you one all your assertions about kerry.  
  All I asked you for was citations from anywhere at all to validate your bold statements.  It wasn't moral superiority or an attempt to bait, merely a request for some proof.  Ofcourse your self-righteous pompous attitude on this subject is the real biat you have set for yourself.  Its people like you who have no desire to refute your political party no matter the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.  People like you exist on both sides and that is exactly what is wrong with this country.  
   So unless you can cite proof to validate such bold statements, you really only discredit yourself by repeating this discredited mantra.

I'm simply not going to engage in your game of "Gotcha!"  You know the facts as well as I; you simply choose to ignore/misrepresent them.  Hence, I will not waste my time with futile citations to authority of which you are well aware but that you nevertheless choose to ignore.

Your worth neither the time nor the effort.  Regardless of the authority, you'll continue to pontificate and treat far Left delusion as authority.