Does Ken Paxton have rape claims pending against him? Does Ken Paxton have a Nazi tattoo? Does he engage in explicit "sexting" with other women while he is married? Did he enlist in the Army because he wanted to kill people? Did he ever have PTSD? Is he a trust fund baby that never had real job? Did his parents have to buy him a business to fool people into thinking he was a capable entrepreneur?
On the flip side, what are Platner's educational credentials to be a US Senator. What experience does he have in regional or local government. Has he ever run for office before? Has he ever held an administrative position in government? Other than the ones he has committed, what does he know about crime?
There are now increasing calls for him to withdraw and his campaign says he's assessing things.
Personally, I think he's toast. So now the question is, who can step forward and have a chance at defeating Collins.
Platner dropping out really puts a crimp in those plans. I heard the runner up in the governor’s primary is a progressive who might pick up the mantle. They have until July 13th to name a replacement.
withdrew his support from Nazi Platner and said he should withdraw from the race and let the Maine Dems pick someone else. A month ago, Ro Khanna was praising Platner as the new breed of "man's man" in the Democrat Party. I guess the "man's man" title falls back to Tim Walz now, that intrepid outdoorsman, albeit with out-of-control jazz hands. Lol
Haven't you ever seen Donald Trump's "concertina hands," you fucking moron?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOsGt4bEUyU
...chill commie
all you can do is drag out, "But, Trump . . . . . " This would make you a "low-IQ individual" in Trump's world. He likes originality.
....all you can do is drag out ad hominem attacks. This would make you a "low-IQ individual" in Trump's world. He likes originality but your ad hominem attacks are unoriginal, hackneyed, repetitive and trite. You recently made a bullshit ad hominem attack against me about a meet and greet. There hasn't been a Bond meet and greet in L.A. in TEN YEARS, you...fucking...moron!!!!! You're about as original as Felcher.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/by-the-same-token-you-----486639?page=
I've been a TER member since 2008. Are you saying you never went to a Bond M & G? That's strange because when I went, you were pointed out to me and I had a chance to observe you for a while and the way you were turning off the ladies there. Many found you amusing, but in a pathetic, not humorous, way. How many providers that you met at a M & G went on to fuck you, but you didn't review them? I'm betting you can't name a single one. They won't even let you touch them when you are willing to pay.
Do you see the irony in you calling ME out for ad hominem attacks? How many times in the last three days have you called me a "fucking moron?" I think it's in almost every post of yours. You have also resumed stalking me on other boards I tried being civil and respectful when I started posting here again, but you can't seem to control yourself. If you become more civil, I will, too. You reap what you sow with me.
No, that's not what I said. Only a fucking moron would think that's what I said.
I clearly wrote: "There hasn't been a Bond meet and greet in L.A. in TEN YEARS, you...fucking...moron!!!!!"
That means you have to go back ten years for an old lying ad hominem attack because you're too fucking stupid to come up with anything original.
Gawd you're dumb!
me going back ten years from memory or you doing searches on TER going back ten years? Answer? Your cognitive decline.
I believe when this first came up there were other members that remembered you being there that posted as well who had similar impressions of your lack of success meeting providers, but that was back when you were a rabid post-puller on anything where you got your ass kicked, so not all of them are still available for our reading enjoyment.
Collins is played out. She’s old feeble and isn’t effective,Maine voters will overlook this planter guy indiscretion.
Seems he’s got a good message where as Collins is the same ol same ol republican, no fresh ideas… just blahhh
But if he does decide to bail, I hope that Janet Mills jumps back in.
Go figure… huh 🤔
Does Ken Paxton have rape claims pending against him? Does Ken Paxton have a Nazi tattoo? Does he engage in explicit "sexting" with other women while he is married? Did he enlist in the Army because he wanted to kill people? Did he ever have PTSD? Is he a trust fund baby that never had real job? Did his parents have to buy him a business to fool people into thinking he was a capable entrepreneur?
On the flip side, what are Platner's educational credentials to be a US Senator. What experience does he have in regional or local government. Has he ever run for office before? Has he ever held an administrative position in government? Other than the ones he has committed, what does he know about crime?
Nazi tattoo,sexting with other women while he is married (by the way Paxton cheated on his wife on a few occasions, hence their public divorce),enlist in the Army because he wanted to kill people, PTSD,is a trust fund baby, having a real job (debatable) parents have to buy him a business to fool people into thinking he was a capable entrepreneur, so would all that be cause for impeachment if he was in government?
See, Paxton was overwhelming impeached by his own party..tells you what they thought of him. Even though he didn't get the full 2/3 vote to impeach..the stink still follows him through Texas..and that's why he might loose his senate run.
And on your flip side...look at the trump administration cabinet and who his adviser are?? Seriously...
Most don't have regional or local government or have run for office before. Haven't held an administrative position in government so tell me...are you serious...SMH
Paxton has faced multiple felony indictments, articles of impeachment, and federal corruption investigations over the last decade. He resolved his primary criminal charges via a pretrial agreement. He paid a fine of $300,000 to have the charges dropped.
An “Epstein “ style sentence. He only served half his time
So tell me…who’d best serve thier constituents?
cheating on your wife the same as raping a woman? He wasn't convicted, neither was Clinton or Trump. Impeachment is supposed to be an embarrassment, but the way the Dems used it on Trump, they removed the seriousness from it. Stink or not, don't you agree the Texas voters will take Paxton over Talarico, the DEI champion, who claims there are six genders? Who wants a fairy for a Senator?
I dunno, but I feel people are fed up with republicans in general now.
Are culture issue gonna decide this race ? Or will policy ?
I’ll Leave that to the Texans but voting for Paxton will only continue with the constant flow of corruption and in the long run…it won’t help them
Oh, and in a way, Ivana was kinda rape by Trump …
the commies and socialists, have a goal of eliminating Republicans completely. Fortunately, the moderate Dems and Independents will not let that happen. Because the far left is the noisiest, I can understand why there would be a false feeling that the Dems are in a better position than they really are.
You can yell “ commies and socialists” but that only works for the over 60 blue hairs now.The under 40, they don’t get that “ commies and socialists” rant. They’re struggling now and the only way out is to get rid of the controlling party, Be it the republicans. Look at how republicans town hall meeting get,It’s brutal
Gage how the elections are going,
My thoughts are, if you’re a incumbent republican and you won your seat by 6pts or less.. be concerned
If you won it by 3pt or less… you’re probably toast
People are fed up an they want change
with his yelling about commies and socialists when there are not, in fact, ANY real communists in this country. It's all part of Trump's desperate effort to distract people from his disastrous policies.
But Iooks like he’s fallin for that “ commies and socialists” rhetoric
Oh well… 🤷🏻♂️
for Congress are calling for confiscation of property. I lost a vacation home in Caracas in the late 1990's when the communists reached their full control of the government. It's what they do. Of course, Mandami is pissed that some of these candidates are letting the cat out of the bag as far as confiscation, redistribution, etc., but the rich see it coming and are moving out of New York. They will pay their taxes from FL or TX and New York will become even a bigger shit hole.
There are few "Blue Hairs" among the Republicans, but they were out in force for the Dems during the Minnesota riots against ICE.
Now tell us which "new Dem nominees...are calling for confiscation of property?" I'll bet the true answer is none of them. Not to mention, even if a couple of them are, they won't be elected. Oh, and then there's the fact that confiscation of property is illegal. It can only happen if you first commit a crime.
in one week. Your ridicule of my post that new Dem nominees are calling for confiscation of private property is not on the news the last few nights with them admitting that is part of their platform. If the government does it, it would be a crime under the color of law, so they would have to change the laws first, which is easier if they start on a local level. It's too soon to try that on a national level this early. NYC will probably be first, following by the State of New York. You should think about moving to FL or TX if you want to own where you live. Just a suggestion.
Please show the class where any sitting Democrat says he wants to confiscate anyone's property. Or was your post what it seems to be: an admission that nothing is actually happening and you're just sniffing AOC's panties.
about the DSA nominees from New York and Colorado who won the Dem primaries and have been vocal about the DSA agenda, including the confiscation of private property. There are clips on the news channels showing them affirming this goal (among other commie goals) in their own words in interviews and press conferences.
I guess he thinks "Eminent Domain" is a commie plot. Except it's been around for centuries and has been used many times in the past for public purposes.
Per AI Overview: "Local and state governments use specific legal pathways to take over neglected or abandoned properties..Governments use this power to seize private property for a 'public use'. This often includes taking over blighted buildings to reduce safety hazards or to build affordable housing.
In Rem Foreclosure: If a property owner stops paying property taxes or ignores serious housing violations, the city or county can sue the property itself to take ownership. The government can then sell it to a new owner who promises to fix it.
Receivership: A judge can take control of the building from the owner and give it to a receiver (a temporary manager). The receiver fixes the building using public money. If the original owner cannot repay the repair costs, the property may be sold.
Eminent domain—the government's right to seize private property for public use—is an ancient sovereign power. It emerged in its modern legal form in 1625 when Dutch jurist Hugo Grotius coined the term "dominium eminens". In the U.S., it was formalized by the Fifth Amendment in 1791.'
Please tell your lackey to do better research before embarrassing you again. Also ask your lackey if he thinks there were communists here in 1625 or 1791.
in a court is not the same as confiscation. If you are going to defend the commies, use their terminology. Once a case is filed in court, the property owner knows it's serious and makes whatever repairs are necessary to make the case moot. You will be hard-pressed to find ANY cases that went all the way with the owner losing his property, except in a condemnation proceeding. Mandami doesn't want condemned property, he wants livable property he can put poor people in at the city's expense. That's why it's going to be confiscation, not a lawsuit.
I clearly pointed out SEVERAL ways under existing law a property can taken by a municipality. Which you conveniently ignore. You also ignore that fact the I proved these means go back centuries before communism existed. Yet now you and your running dog are finding commies under every rock.
every rock, the commies are the Democrat Party's nominees for the U.C. Congress.
If only Senator Joseph McCarthy was alive to save us.
@realdemocratswanttoconfiscateptivateproperty
AI Overview
Yes, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's housing agenda includes plans to confiscate specific private properties. Specifically, his "Block by Block" policy seeks to take chronic, severely neglected buildings from negligent landlords and transfer ownership to tenants, nonprofits, or community land trusts.
This policy focus has drawn substantial attention and debate:
• Aggressive Confiscation: Mamdani's administration aims to intervene in housing crises and use aggressive legal tactics to remove negligent property managers.
•
•
• Resurfaced Comments: His housing plans have faced heavy criticism following the surfacing of a 2020 podcast interview. In the interview, he floated the "abolition of private property" as a preferable system if it could guarantee a home to everyone.
•
•
• Reactions: The policy agenda and past comments have prompted significant backlash from conservative lawmakers, property rights advocates, and real estate groups, who argue that the seizures are unconstitutional and threaten fundamental ownership rights.
He "suspended" his campaign. So now who will the Dems nominate? At least they now have a shot at beating Collins -- though it will be tough. But there was no chance Platner could have won. So, all in all, a good thing for Dems.
No apology, blame everyone with no accountability
And lie your way out. Playing the victim.
I swear he sounded like a republican..🤣🤣🤣
Now instead of the democrat voters of Maine voting for and choosing the candidate they want the party will pick, soviet style, who will be on the ballot. Hmmm when did that happen last? (Hint 2024 presidential election) and how did that work out for them?
I wonder if that was the plan all along, NOT letting the people decide.
Hey the leftists would love to reincarnate Gus Hall and put him on the ballot.
You are really an idiot, or at least your posts are idiotic.
As it is she's a toxic, vile, hysterical, raging, raving, pustule-ridden, revolting, ignorant, imbecilic, repugnant, reptilian, cloaca.
"A cloaca (pronounced kloh-AY-kuh) is a single, multi-purpose rear opening. In biology, it serves as the only exit for digestive, urinary, and reproductive tracts in amphibians, reptiles, birds, and some fish. The word originates from Latin, meaning "sewer" or "drain."
I ORDER her to reply (she used to use this one until I ridiculed her into embarrassed silence. Now watch her claim I'm copying her.)
Again you prove and admit you steal my ideas, lines and phrases.
Yeah pus I did stop ordering you to reply because I have you so well trained
There is no need to do so, and pus will of course , reply to this post.
Pus thinks he embarrassed me into silence, and with that statement admits he wants my 1st amendment rights to be taken from me and wishes he had the power to do so. Again failure would be a step up for pus.
Pus just cannot...CUM… to terms with it.
Just because you have the right to say whatever the fuck you want doesn't mean you should. But I realize that even on a "good" day, you make meaningless contributions to this board, so knock yourself out. Nobody takes you seriously. Silence would certainly be an improvement over what you are posting, but don't go all "first amendment rights" on me. Somehow, I expect you will. Remember, the more you post the stupider you look. Post on, dimwit, post on.
Your paramour, I’m sure he rewarded you with a reach around.
So you say “nobody takes you seriously” well you obviously do, because you always reply. Your replies are always telling me I should be silent or some such thing expressing your desire for my 1st amendment right be taken.
Then you play the victim and cowardly hide behind saying “but don't go all "first amendment rights" on me. Somehow, I expect you will. “ But I really do not have to because that is your desire and you clearly imply and suggest it in every reply.
In any case it is fun watching you try to do so, then wiggle squirm and twist and whining and crying when called out.
Your ass is jealous of all the shit coming out of your mouth.
And just like your paramour failure would be a step up for you.
Rave on
Rant on
Rage on
I don't take you seriously, I don't know anybody who does, because you act like an angry, uninformed, clown. As always, your thinking is illogical and devoid of reason. Of course, predictably, you couldn't help yourself in claiming I'm somehow depriving you of your first amendment rights. Tell me exactly how I'm taking away your right to speak and make a fool of yourself? I can't take away your right to speak anymore than you can take away mine. That's why I reply to you because I can and you can't do anything about it except whine and cry. By the way, the first amendment states that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech. I'm not Congress so, if I want to, I can tell you to STFU, and that's not a violation of the first amendment. Let's try it out. STFU, you MAGA moron. That feels good and constitutional.