Are the snowflakes going to turn on Comey again like they did in November?

The D's will just say even though Comey won't admit to pressure he was in fact pressured, and the investigation must continue until they find something (cuz they know something is there to find).  It is all a game to last as long as they can to 1) slow trumps agenda (which he his helping to slow all by himself) and 2) give the D's something to run on in 2018 as they will even have find the evildoing, or at least protected America by looking into it.

It's a senate hearing and that committee is somewhat fucked up. So it'll be pretty much what we all suspected anyways. It's all ready been played out. So I don't think the "snowflakes" will freak out. It's the Mueller investigation that will be telling. But the rightie meatheads will chant, "See I told you,nothing there","Hillary should go to jail" and the "trump is great"..you know all that righties meathead shit that they love to chant about....so I'm not holding my breath.
And Comey is gone, so I'm over it....he should have got canned sooner.

-- Modified on 6/7/2017 4:22:45 PM

don't have a backup plan. All they do is whine and cry.  Especially the snowflakes on this board. After the hearing they will hit the streets in protest as usual. More bullshit signs and meaningless chants from the libs.....  

Mueller's hiring big-time Mafia and Fraud lawyers, and, big-time lawyers don't wanna work for Trump.  Mueller wouldn't hire these guys unless/until he thought he had significant evidence

Trump didn't want honesty to clear his name, but loyalty to remove the cloud hanging over him.  The written statement also paints a picture of Trump being intimidating when not allowed to manipulate and control a separate branch of governments job to investigate.

Money Laundering, Tax Evasion, Obstruction of Justice by pressuring FBI to halt criminal investigations, Nepotism (son in law and daughter doing private business from Government property), Conflict of interest (Trump Hotels and Resorts).

He will resign in disgrace and may be he will then release his fraudulent tax returns!

Straight up correct. Even if Comey is dumb enough to say Trump did this or that then that makes HIM a felon.  

We here, and the rest of the world would like to see you proof........have at it snow flake.  

Resign? For what, do tell?

The FBI falls under the EXECUTIVE branch. POTUS is the HEAD of the executive branch. So what "separate branch of governments" (sic) are you referring?  

Comey's statement, the core of his testimony, was already made public.  He confirmed what Trump said, that Comey DID tell him he was not the subject of an investigation.  BUT, Comey also confirmed Trump tried to get him to stop his investigation, which many believe is obstruction of justice.  So Trump's lawyer's statement that Comey's statement vindicates him is hardly true.  Now Trump surrogates are out there saying all that matters is Comey confirmed one thing Trump said, while Democrats are saying it also proves Trump obstructed justice and should be impeached.  Where ya been, Wu?

They're going to connect the dots. Then it'll be all laid out. These House and Senate hearings are minor leagues.

Give it a few more days and everything will fall in to place.

Here is the first one for you:   Taj Mahal Hotel settled $10 million for money laundering.    This is on top of $25 million for a fraud called "Trump University".     Tax evasion because he does not want to release his tax returns.   If he is not evading and cheating on his taxes, he has no problem releasing his tax returns.    Obstruction of Justice.   Read full text of James Comey opening statement.     Nepotism.    Son in law using White House and selling US visa in China for $500K to finance his NJ grand condo complex.    son in law running his real estate business from WH.    Conflict of Interest.    Making money out of Trump International Hotel in DC by having Government visitors use the hotel as patronage to get things done.

Mueller's probe is secret and we may hear nothing about it for years.

I do take what he says seriously but let the record also show that another well-known legal analyst, Jeff Toobin, disagrees with him.

Big sign outside FBI Headquarters:

I know you are smart enough not to side with a political hack like Toobin, who has been screaming obstruction for weeks now, against liberal constitutional law heavy weights like Dershowitz and Turley.

Well FOX News host told the Fake in Chief that "it is not fake news that is the problem it is you who is the problem".   digest it.

Telling FBI Director to end a criminal investigation of NSA head.     Asking for loyalty and not getting it.     Coercing FBI Director to slow down and lift the cloud over Russia investigation.    None of these was done by the FBI Director.

Dershowitz is a bright, political renegade.  Toobin is a well-known authority on the Supreme Court. Turley is solid as hell. Take them all seriously and don't decide which one to believe because of your own political prejudices. Then you become the political hack.

Toobin is a partisan Dem, much like Judge Napolitano is a partisan Rep on Fox.  

How many books have you written?  None is my guess.  Toobin has written several well-reviewed books on the Supreme Court.  He's not a hack.

-- Modified on 6/7/2017 10:15:24 PM

..Keep talking out of your ass, Jack.  Guess who disagrees with you that Turley is a liberal?  The Daily Kos, BWAHAHAHAHA!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/5/26/735541/-

You mean the "Jews"?????

Interesting theory there BP. LOL!

...TWO businesses (shining your cop father's shoes and shining your cop brother's shoes) what "hearsay" is.  Townhall SAYS Turley describes himself as a liberal.  Where is your link that shows Turley HIMSELF saying he is a liberal?  As I thought, you still haven't pulled it out of your ass.  

I have seen him introduced as a "liberal" constitutional academic on dozens of occasions. Quite incredible you lack this information that is widely known. What confuses you is that he isn't as ideologically pure as you would want. He is a classic liberal who chooses to place civil liberties and the constitution ahead of party. Mr. Dershowitz does the same, as is why I respect both the way I do. Based on your logic, Bill O'Reilly isn't a conservative because he calls himself a "traditionalist." Johnson respects Turley's keen legal mind and fairness; qualities you obviously lack. Ed Schulz was very pro second amendment. Was he not a staunch progressive? You speak of things you don't not know. Think before you post. Are you capable? Good day.

Just follow the money and dumb ass Trump actions!

But, ya gotta complete the sentence.  Comey told trump that he wasn't under investigation at the time.  That was then, this is now.

Yep.....it just did and Comey just found himself in the bottom of the ninth with no one on and 2 outs and down by a bunch.