I have handled more conspiracy cases than I can count. I think there may have been two where no one talked, and they only involved conspiracies of 5 people at the most. Even in conspiracies of two people, one or both will often blab.
The scope of something like 9-11 would require hunreds of people. Of course, the number varies depending on which conspiracy theory you believe, but just use one as an example:
There is a theory that the towers were imploded. If you have read about imploding buildings, you know how many people it takes and how long it takes to set up. The thought of a couple experts directing a slew of people to run around both buildings in the Trade Center is pretty daunting.
Also, you have hundreds of security guards routinely wandering the building. This is not the type of thing you set up in a day, so you have shifts of guards. I assume that you don't want them seeing or saying anything. Do you bribe them? How do you bribe a dozen guards, knowing in advance that not one will rat out the group? And none ever did.
Did the Pres know in advance? If so, I assume he didn't actually plant the bombs. How many people are their between the president and the actual perpetrators? All mum.
I assume that the Pres, if he was involved, did not want to get caught. However, you know that there will be investigators from 1,000 agencies, some outside the scope of the jurisdiction of the federal. Thousands of people searching for evidence on every level. How is he going to guarantee, in advance, that none of them will find something that blows the lid?
Indeed, how can he be sure the press would remain silent in face of such a huge scar to the national psyche.
Finally, there is a theory that the buildings wouldn't fall that way. Funny. There are 1,000 schools of architectre and engineering in the United States, many on campuses that are traditionally hostile to Bush. Likewise, there are another 5,000 departments in France, Italy, Germany, Japan, etc.
there are more engineering and architectural professional organizations than I could guess at. And the president knows in advance that not one will see this impossible feat and publish an article.
Remember "Rather-gate?" One flaw in the document, the footnotes, were picked up by dozens of examiners around the country, until the flaw was exposed.
But with 9-11, it is supposed to be impossible that the buildings would collapse that way, but not one expert at Harvard, Yale, UCLA, or any of 1,000 schools says, "Peep"
Posted By: Madison_Ohare
I will never get that image out of my mind, those poor people, leaping to their death. It must have been the biggest decision of their life. I do not watch the news because I think main stream media has brain-washed us with what to believe. The more research via internet on the federal reserve, global elite, different puppets (doesn't matter if their name has a D or R behind) I try not to think about to much because it is very painful to think that we are the sheep being lead to the slaughter, sold out by both parties. What are your thoughts on the attack on the twin towers? and where this country is heading...Thanks, Madison