Politics and Religion

If Obama "Pals around Terrorists," Then Palin "Pals around SUCCESSIONISTS"
RULER_OF_THE_UNIVERSE 2614 reads
posted

Hell, she's MARRIED to one.

-- Modified on 10/5/2008 7:28:20 PM

chickens have come home to toost.

Obama is dirty just like I've been telling you all along!!!!!  The 'Chicago Way' is coming home to roost and bight Obama's butt and Biden's butt and that dirty witch Katie Couric's stinky butt. [Katie Couric is an especially partisan witch][She is so so so partisan that I would NOT like to lick her pussy and then stick in my weenie]  I wouldn't waste a good hit of viagra on Katie Couric because she has an ugly personality that makes her a witch.

That Dude in the link Robert Mackey is nothing but a hack writer.  Rush Limbaugh would slap the fuck out of him and so would Michael Medved.  they'd kick his ass so bad that Mackey would think he got run over by a bus.

Obama is corrupt.  Bill Ayer and his witch of a wife Bernadine Dohrn belong in jail but they got off on a technicality.

Tony Rezko is a dirt bag and Obama is his good friend---oh wait---there is no honor among thieves and they are a couple of thieves.

Franklin Raines is another piece of work.  Obama got lots of campaign money from him just like Chris Dodd and others.  

I'm sorry but they are corrupt. The good news is the chickens are coming home to roost.

First off, I'm sorry, I am not usually one of those 'spelling geek' types, but I couldn't help but guffaw at the fact that you posted a link on which the word "secessionist" is printed in HUGE BOLD LETTERS right at the very top - and you still got it wrong in your post. One wonders how carefully you read your own link. Credit shall be given however, for not designating yourself as the "rooler" of the universe :)

Now then, having had a bit of fun, lets look at your claim a little more closely. Sarah Palin herself, as the article points out, is not and never has been a member of the AIP. I suppose a grudging point must be given to the Huffington Post for not attempting to continue making that claim. Generally no matter how thoroughly their nose is rubbed in facts, they will persist in spreading whatever the lie du jour is. However, the article notes that her husband was a member for "several years". Pity that several only boils down to about three years, give or take. Yup, that is an awful lot of time. Not quite the number of years that Obama has been bosom buddies with a known terrorist. Not quite the number of years that Obama has been mentored by a terrorist sympathizer.

Who is that terrorist sympathizer you ask? Why, good old Jeremiah Wright of course, who re-printed an Hamas Terror Manifesto in his church bulletin. Wasn't that sweet of him?


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59456

http://www.bizzyblog.com/wp-images/TUCChamasColumn072207.jpg


-- Modified on 10/6/2008 6:30:52 AM

RULER_OF_THE_UNIVERSE2220 reads

*YAWN* Repeated Baloney Stuff that Has Been Disproven Time and Time Again.

Palin may not be a member of AIP, but her husband is.  So, just like Palin's argument of "Guilty by association," Palin is JUST as guilty.

She's MARRIED to a member of AIP, her husband!

The first link I provided will take you to an article about the fact that Wright re-printed a terrorist manifesto in his weekly church bulletin. The second link is a PDF of file OF the church bulletin, wherein every single word of the manifesto can be clearly read, along with the copyright information at the bottom identifiying the publication as belonging to Jeremiah Wright.

Try reading before you "dismiss" baloney :)

And once again you misstate yourself. Todd Palin WAS a member of AIP, his membership ended years ago. He did not need to be hounded to death for more than a month before he left the group. That was Obama. It took him over a month before he finally grew enough marbles (can't properly call them balls) to leave TUCC.

RightwingUnderground1400 reads

Nevermind I found it:

Webster's 1913 Dictionary
Suc`ces´sion`ist
n. 1. (Eccl.) A person who insists on the importance of a regular succession of events, offices, etc.; especially (Eccl.), one who insists that apostolic succession alone is valid.


Makes sense, but just who are these successionists?

that makes something look successful when it really ain't?

Register Now!