: If every whistleblower was attacked for being supportive of his bosse before he blew the whistle on : Discussion in Politics and Religion, posted by HornyGuyYeah

1,978,841 Total Reviews 4,257 New Reviews

9,988 Users Online

Politics and Religion

Tree
Flat

If every whistleblower was attacked for being supportive of his bosse before he blew the whistle on

HornyGuyYeah 40393 reads

posted 21 years ago

them, we'd have no whistleblowers. But that is exactly what they are trying to do to Clarke.

The most telling thing is that instead of focusing on the substance of what their accuser says, they attack the accuser personally. I think this will backfire on Bush and his people.

agrkej21 years ago36465 reads

The administration is hurting its own credibility in their attacks

For example Cheney saying Clarke was out of the loop while Rice says he was involved in every meeting that was held about terrorism, or by claiming meetings never took place and later proven wrong.

Reply Quote Report

Poopdeck Pappy21 years ago35065 reads

There are inconsistencies on both sides,

but that does not excuse anyone from listening to the entire story, or anyone condemning Clarke. He has brought forth some serious information that, whether true or not, needs to be addressed.