"The issue here, as I have heard it raised, is was he present and active on duty in Alabama at the times he was supposed to be. . . . Just because you get an honorable discharge does not in fact answer that question."

--John Kerry, questioning President Bush's
military-service record, February 8, 2004.

"A good rule in politics is that anyone who picks a fight ought to be prepared to finish it. But having first questioned Mr. Bush's war service, and then made Vietnam the core of his own campaign for President, Mr. Kerry now cries No mas! because other Vietnam vets are assailing his behavior before and after that war. And, by the way, Mr. Bush is supposedly honor bound to repudiate them.

We've tried to avoid the medals-and-ribbons fight ourselves, except to warn Mr. Kerry that he was courting precisely such scrutiny ("Kerry's Medals Strategy," February 9). But now that the Senator is demanding that the Federal Election Commission stifle his opponents' free speech, this one is too rich to ignore."

Wall Street Journal, August 24, 2004

So who opened this can of worms?  The stink surrounding Kerry's dubious Vietnam revisionism is just too copious!  Like I have said many times, the only person in America I would have liked more as the democrat challenger is the moron from Vermont!

In honor of the leftist Einstiens on this forum, I have made an additional contribution to the Swifties to air their newest ad!  You can view it at the link below:

http://www.swiftvets.com