But, says Wanker, "I'm gonna throw up this useless bullshit anyway."
"Because it suits my prejudices and I just don't care."
I haven’t had time to check the sources here, but thought it would make for interesting reading. I haven’t looked at the research here either, but it is consistent with other research I’ve read.
But, says Wanker, "I'm gonna throw up this useless bullshit anyway."
"Because it suits my prejudices and I just don't care."
And decide for yourself if the information is good. I know that’s asking a lot from the laziest poster on the board.
"I haven't had time to check" and other stupid shit but then calls ME lazy. LOL
You meant asking a lot from the lying-est poster on this board. Or maybe he's lazy too but just didn't want to leave out his top tier ability to lie. He has that mastered.
Wet Willy has been beating this dead horse for the last 5 years.
…when you swore up and down that ivermectin wasn’t an anti-viral and I posted a systemic review of ivermectin saying it was an anti-viral and you still kept saying it wasn’t because you hadn’t bothered to click the link and so I had to post a screen shot of the webpage and you got so embarrassed you left the board for several years?
Fun times.
I remember that thread. I read the article willy cited and it was all about IN VITRO testing. Almost any compound can be shown to be effective in vitro. (Just increase the dose or change some other parameter.) There are MANY compounds that are both anti-cancer AND anti-viral (and sometimes anti-bacterial) in vitro but it is rare for them to become FDA approved drugs for use in humans.
…when you swore up and down that ivermectin wasn’t an anti-viral and I posted a systemic review of ivermectin saying it was an anti-viral and you still kept saying it wasn’t because you hadn’t bothered to click the link and so I had to post a screen shot of the webpage and you got so embarrassed you left the board for several years?
Fun times.
I remember that willy doesn't know how to read and then makes stuff up to try-and-fail to prove his points. Like most MAGAs, he reads a headline and or listens to a tiktok or just repeats Trump propaganda like a trained parrot.
.
Where's the rest of the abstract?
.
Ivermectin ***proposes*** many potentials effects to treat a range of diseases, with its antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-cancer properties as a wonder drug. It is highly effective against many microorganisms including some viruses. In this comprehensive systematic review, antiviral effects of ivermectin are summarized including ***in vitro*** and ***in vivo*** studies over the past 50 years. Several studies reported antiviral effects of ivermectin on RNA viruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, there are some studies showing antiviral effects of ivermectin against DNA viruses such as Equine herpes type 1, BK polyomavirus, pseudorabies, porcine circovirus 2, and bovine herpesvirus 1. Ivermectin plays a role in several biological mechanisms, therefore it ***could*** [or could ***NOT***] serve as a ***potential*** candidate in the treatment of a wide range of viruses including COVID-19 as well as other types of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. **In vivo studies of *****animal models***** ** revealed a broad range of antiviral effects of ivermectin, *****however, clinical trials are necessary to appraise the potential efficacy of ivermectin in clinical setting.*****
... "In this systematic review, we showed antiviral effects of ivermectin on a broad range of RNA and DNA viruses by reviewing all related evidences since 1970. This study presents the ****possibility**** that ivermectin could be a useful antiviral agent in several viruses including those with positive-sense single-stranded RNA, in similar fashion. Since significant *****effectiveness of ivermectin is seen in the **early stages of infection** in experimental studies,***** it is proposed that ivermectin administration may be effective in the early stages or prevention. ********Of course, confirmation of this statement requires human studies and clinical trials.********
And this is the evidence that willy is relying upon to prove his position that ivermectin is ready to roll and wipe out Covid?????
lol.
I remember that willy doesn't know how to read and then makes stuff up to try-and-fail to prove his points. Like most MAGAs, he reads a headline and or listens to a tiktok or just repeats Trump propaganda like a trained parrot.
.
Where's the rest of the abstract?
.
Ivermectin ***proposes*** many potentials effects to treat a range of diseases, with its antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-cancer properties as a wonder drug. It is highly effective against many microorganisms including some viruses. In this comprehensive systematic review, antiviral effects of ivermectin are summarized including ***in vitro*** and ***in vivo*** studies over the past 50 years. Several studies reported antiviral effects of ivermectin on RNA viruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, there are some studies showing antiviral effects of ivermectin against DNA viruses such as Equine herpes type 1, BK polyomavirus, pseudorabies, porcine circovirus 2, and bovine herpesvirus 1. Ivermectin plays a role in several biological mechanisms, therefore it ***could*** [or could ***NOT***] serve as a ***potential*** candidate in the treatment of a wide range of viruses including COVID-19 as well as other types of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. **In vivo studies of *****animal models***** ** revealed a broad range of antiviral effects of ivermectin, *****however, clinical trials are necessary to appraise the potential efficacy of ivermectin in clinical setting.*****
... "In this systematic review, we showed antiviral effects of ivermectin on a broad range of RNA and DNA viruses by reviewing all related evidences since 1970. This study presents the ****possibility**** that ivermectin could be a useful antiviral agent in several viruses including those with positive-sense single-stranded RNA, in similar fashion. Since significant *****effectiveness of ivermectin is seen in the **early stages of infection** in experimental studies,***** it is proposed that ivermectin administration may be effective in the early stages or prevention. ********Of course, confirmation of this statement requires human studies and clinical trials.********
And this is the evidence that willy is relying upon to prove his position that ivermectin is ready to roll and wipe out Covid?????
lol.
The rest of the abstract is right there in the link... it is this the reason you write out 50 page posts?
Lost didn't read beyond the headline or spend more than 10 seconds reading the post either.
.
I posted the ENTIRE abstract because willy left out important parts such as: " **In vivo studies of *****animal models***** ** revealed a broad range of antiviral effects of ivermectin, *****however, clinical trials are necessary to appraise the potential efficacy of ivermectin in [a] clinical setting.*****
.
I quoted further from the text itself:
" It **may** be concluded that ivermectin **could** be effective ... *******Of course, confirmation of this statement requires further human studies and clinical trials.*******"
.
"it is proposed that ivermectin administration may be effective in the early stages or prevention. ********Of course, confirmation of this statement requires human studies and clinical trials.********"
.
"*****the activity of ivermectin in cell culture has not [been] reproduced in mouse infection models against many of the viruses and has not been clinically proven either,*****"
.
To willy and MAGAs who fall in line, that's how this paper (and many similar papers) proves that ivermectin is a Miracle Drug. Which is to say, as of now, IT ISN'T!
I remember that willy doesn't know how to read and then makes stuff up to try-and-fail to prove his points. Like most MAGAs, he reads a headline and or listens to a tiktok or just repeats Trump propaganda like a trained parrot.
.
Where's the rest of the abstract?
.
Ivermectin ***proposes*** many potentials effects to treat a range of diseases, with its antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-cancer properties as a wonder drug. It is highly effective against many microorganisms including some viruses. In this comprehensive systematic review, antiviral effects of ivermectin are summarized including ***in vitro*** and ***in vivo*** studies over the past 50 years. Several studies reported antiviral effects of ivermectin on RNA viruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, there are some studies showing antiviral effects of ivermectin against DNA viruses such as Equine herpes type 1, BK polyomavirus, pseudorabies, porcine circovirus 2, and bovine herpesvirus 1. Ivermectin plays a role in several biological mechanisms, therefore it ***could*** [or could ***NOT***] serve as a ***potential*** candidate in the treatment of a wide range of viruses including COVID-19 as well as other types of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. **In vivo studies of *****animal models***** ** revealed a broad range of antiviral effects of ivermectin, *****however, clinical trials are necessary to appraise the potential efficacy of ivermectin in clinical setting.*****
... "In this systematic review, we showed antiviral effects of ivermectin on a broad range of RNA and DNA viruses by reviewing all related evidences since 1970. This study presents the ****possibility**** that ivermectin could be a useful antiviral agent in several viruses including those with positive-sense single-stranded RNA, in similar fashion. Since significant *****effectiveness of ivermectin is seen in the **early stages of infection** in experimental studies,***** it is proposed that ivermectin administration may be effective in the early stages or prevention. ********Of course, confirmation of this statement requires human studies and clinical trials.********
And this is the evidence that willy is relying upon to prove his position that ivermectin is ready to roll and wipe out Covid?????
lol.
The rest of the abstract is right there in the link... it is this the reason you write out 50 page posts?
I imagine that willy's response to Musk's demand for "5 things I did last week" will get him a promotion: "I spent 4 hours per day posting Trump propaganda to the TER P&R Board."
You get that this is a systemic review right? It’s a collection of all the various research showing the promise of ivermectin.
“Bob’s research showed it might be handy for this purpose. Joe’s research the year prior showed it might be handy for that purpose. Let’s look at all the research and see what’s going on here. Does this drug show promise that we’re missing?”
This is the thought process. Ivermectin has shown a lot of promise as a broad spectrum anti-viral drug. It even has anti-cancer properties.
You can spit in a Petri dish (or peach tree dish as MAGA Medical authority Marjorie Taylor Greene would say) and find activity against all sorts of microorganisms. You are far, far away from having a useful and effective drug. People discovered plenty of antibiotics in Petri dishes BEFORE Fleming and penicillin (1928). Most were too toxic for use in treating any disease in humans. (Prontosil is one that was useful except for the side effects.)
.
You and Lost and Trump MAGAs are squawking about using ivermectin to treat Covid in humans. The evidence wasn't there and still isn't there.
.
Here is a review of CLINICAL outcomes, NOT wishful thinking:
https://www.cochrane.org/CD015017/INFECTN_ivermectin-preventing-and-treating-covid-19
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19
"We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. The evidence base improved slightly in this update, but is still limited."
You get that this is a systemic review right? It’s a collection of all the various research showing the promise of ivermectin.
“Bob’s research showed it might be handy for this purpose. Joe’s research the year prior showed it might be handy for that purpose. Let’s look at all the research and see what’s going on here. Does this drug show promise that we’re missing?”
This is the thought process. Ivermectin has shown a lot of promise as a broad spectrum anti-viral drug. It even has anti-cancer properties.
…then they wouldn’t have to fudge the results by under dosing patients to make it look like ivermectin doesn’t work.
I have been more vaccinated than everyone on this board by a lot, multiple smallpox, multiple anthrax, and every other thing you can think of so I am not anti vaccine by any stretch.
MRNA technology isn’t a vaccine and the nasty side effects? Hard pass for me. Soooo how many shots and boosters have you had impy?
PS I caught Covid Christmas 2020 and I haven’t caught it again since. Basically it was a medium cold. In addition I have had multiple exposures since and never contracted it again.
What’s your history?
I've been vaccinated for:
Polio
Smallpox
Influenza (40 or so times)
Pneumonia (3X)
Yellow Fever
Covid (5X)
RSV
Shingles
And those are just the ones I can recall at the moment. I haven't had any side effects at all.
Seeing how he’s got deployments under his belt, I think it’s safe to say he’s gotten more vaccinations during his time of service than you’ve had in your entire life.
You are free to do that and I am free not to.
You also failed to consider I've been vaccinated for the flu at least 40 times and probably more than 50.
Since you accept Looooooser's military tales I assume you also accept my statements about various accomplishments, travel and holdings.
I am probably done skiing in Vermont for the season but skied 20 days this year.
I’m not here to argue biographies.
(Insert BigPapaSearch where he finds me challenging a bio).
You do have a high number of flu vaccines, so that might even you up with all the vaccines Lost received during his time in service.
Actually I left this board because life is too short to try to educate right-wing MAGA extremists and idiots.
This assumes you know something we don’t. Which is hilarious.
I'll match my CV up against yours anytime. However you do excel in conspiracy theories, misinformation, and bullshit.
Is ivermectin an anti-viral drug?
It's an anthelmintic. We've been over this too many times. Your obsession with ivermectin is pathological.
Actually, I left this board
Because you are not man enough to face the terrible beating you got in November.
Because you are not man enough to face the terrible beating you got in November.
Terrible beating ? Only 230,000 votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania decided the presidential election. Those swing voters will swing back in 2026 and 2028.
The Democrats didn’t just lose in 2024. They’re losing more and more by the day. Their support is crumbling. And fast. I was recently looking at new voter registrations. If things keep up at the same pace, by 2028 New Jersey will flip red. Imagine what’s going on in other blue states right now. Republicans made massive in roads in California. At the current pace, in two election cycles California will become a red state.
That's about as likely as you becoming a liberal. Oh wait, you once were. Never mind. How fucked up does someone have to be to go from liberal to MAGA?
People do that when common sense prevails.
Trump got 58% of the electoral vote
That is a terrible beating
what the vision of the Democrats is for the future that will persuade defected voters to come home? Trans-issues, DEI, wokeness, wasteful spending, open borders and high crime aren't selling anymore. What will they have left?
what the vision of the Democrats is for the future that will persuade defected voters to come home? Trans-issues, DEI, wokeness, wasteful spending, open borders and high crime aren't selling anymore. What will they have left?
-- Modified on 3/18/2025 9:32:53 PM
Your link is referring to side effects. The link I posted was referring to the excess death rates. Both mention Germany though. So you were close.
On the other hand, SLAY News is known as a fake news site. So, whatever, u want to believe, believe. I know people who died from Covid because they refused to get vaccinated. Who knows what would have happened if they chose another path.
lol.
The mRNA shots didn’t protect anyone. If they were effective then research papers wouldn’t have had to use selection bias to make it look like they work. But the shots (they weren’t vaccines) did give people heart attacks, blood clots, cancer and AIDS.
They sure as hell protected ME. I've gotten every shot and every booster. When, after more than a year I tested positive for Covid it was more like a two-day mild cold. If I hadn't tested positive, I'd never have known I had it.
Oh, and I have also NOT had "heart attacks, blood clots, cancer and AIDS."
Wanker is a delusional, lying sack of protoplasm.
But he's in good company here, among lying idiots like Loooooser and The SPOAT.
I didn't get any shot
No booster...
I got something like a very mild flu that after testing was covid. There were maybe 2 days I felt the worse but not even close to enough to not be able to function. Could still work from home.
I almost didn't even test for it because it was mild. So really..... what did your government shot really do. Let the lie fest begin from the biggest liar on the planet.
And yet he has given us some. If he actually read my words, what I got was MUCH milder than what he claims he got. Mine was only like a mild cold, NOT "mild flu."
And that's not even the point. The point is what I COULD have gotten if I hadn't had the shot: a full-blown case of Covid lasting weeks and possibly including hospitalization.
But thanks for more un-needed proof of what an ignorant idiot you are.
And here it is on FULL display because ickybiden here just totally missed the point. I'm not sure he understands at all? I don't give a damn about what "words" you used. I was making a factual point?? I actually got it twice without any of your untested government shots with virtually the same symptoms as you described.
If there's one thing that Ickybiden didn't need, it was a shot that made him any dumber than he already is.
And it was promised that with the shots the spike protein would just stay in our arms. But as it turns out, nope.
That graphic is a slightly modified table from a 58-page report,
http://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf
Specifically, 4.2.2. Study 185350, pages 43-45.
.
"The concentration of radioactive lipid marker reached the peak level in plasma (8.9 µg lipid eqv/mL) between 1 – 4 h post-dose and distribution mainly into liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries over 48 h (Table 4-2). The concentration of radioactivity remained highest in injection site at all time-points."
Where do you claim the report says that "The Spike Protein itself is cyto-toxic."????
.
One of the conclusions in that report is:
"Repeat dose toxicity studies with the proposed vaccine and a variant, both in the LNP formulation, in rats raised no safety issues. Findings were consistent with immune stimulation and inflammation responses (injection site inflammation, increased body temperature, leucocytosis, increased large unstained cells, fibrinogen and acute phase proteins, and hypercellularity of lymphohaematopoietic tissues). Hepatocyte vacuolation (probably lipid vacuoles) was not associated with evidence of liver injury and was reversible."
And it was promised that with the shots the spike protein would just stay in our arms. But as it turns out, nope.
.
There was considerable prior experience with LNPs and mRNA vaccines in animals, long before Covid. It was KNOWN that most of the vaccine remains at the site of injection but that some migrates to other organs. WHY DO YOU THINK THEY HAVE BEEN DOING THOSE STUDIES FOR MANY YEARS??? "We'd better check for distribution and do lots of expensive experiments on dozens of organs in hundreds and thousands of animals." "Nah, don't bother with that ... even Trump says, "Stop the testing!! If we stop the testing the numbers will go down!!"" "Too late ... we already have many years of data to show that small amounts do migrate to other organs."
Do you really need me to make you look like an idiot some more? Yes, the spike protein is cytotoxic. That was another one of those “conspiracy theories” that turned out to be true. The usual gate keepers admitted it years ago. That’s why one of the side effects of the shots is myocarditis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_spike_protein
"During the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-vaccination misinformation about COVID-19 circulated on social media platforms related to the spike protein's role in COVID-19 vaccines. Spike proteins were said to be dangerously "cytotoxic" and mRNA vaccines containing them therefore in themselves dangerous. Spike proteins are not cytotoxic or dangerous."
.
If you have reliable sources other than a blanket "one of those "conspiracy theories" that turned out to be true" with no other proof or justification, please post the link here.
.
I think willy's principle source for his posts is the Trump propaganda machine. His fallback is to post something from the this extensive (100 page) wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_misinformation (Some sub-sections have their own more detailed wikipedia pages.)
Do you really need me to make you look like an idiot some more? Yes, the spike protein is cytotoxic. That was another one of those “conspiracy theories” that turned out to be true. The usual gate keepers admitted it years ago. That’s why one of the side effects of the shots is myocarditis.
You know IMP, you should just suck it up and download the X app. You could do a search on X of “spike protein cytotoxic” and see scientists and doctors from all over the world weighing in on the issue, posting research papers, etc.
Wikipedia has footnotes to dozens of peer reviewed scientific research articles to support each claim.
You know IMP, you should just suck it up and download the X app. You could do a search on X of “spike protein cytotoxic” and see scientists and doctors from all over the world weighing in on the issue, posting research papers, etc.
I do not use X. I'm not going to waste time sifting through mountains of garbage. I get more than enough of that, from willy, right here on P&R.
...I shouldn't have to force feed you research just because you're too stubborn to look at it, particularly when I tell you where to look. X is what you make of it. You can follow political hacks, or you can watch cat videos on it. Or you can follow research scientists. About 80% of the people I follow on X are scientists, doctors, etc.
Here's a small sample of screen shots when doing a search of "Spike protein cytotoxic". I could literally scroll through posts like these until I'm blue in the face. One of these are making fun of that wiki entry. My apologies for the sheer size of this image. 
Just post the direct links to the articles themselves. If it's in JAMA, post the JAMA link. If it's in NEJM, post the NEJM link. If it's in BMJ, post the BMJ link. If it's on medRxiv, post the medRxiv link. Do I need to include "etc."?
...I shouldn't have to force feed you research just because you're too stubborn to look at it, particularly when I tell you where to look. X is what you make of it. You can follow political hacks, or you can watch cat videos on it. Or you can follow research scientists. About 80% of the people I follow on X are scientists, doctors, etc.
Here's a small sample of screen shots when doing a search of "Spike protein cytotoxic". I could literally scroll through posts like these until I'm blue in the face. One of these are making fun of that wiki entry. My apologies for the sheer size of this image.
All those screen shots were taken in about a minute of scrolling. You can put in the bare minimum of effort here. If that alone doesn’t convince you, then the endless top notch hookers on X should. About 50% of the hookers I’m seeing these day I found on X. Total smoke shows I never would have known existed if I didn’t find them on X. You can look at a zillion websites and not find nearly as many.
Silly, Silly, Willy.
up for grabs. BigP has a lock on it just like he has had for the past 15+ years.
That is nothing but facts right there!! ⬆️
And actually bigp knows it and gets 9 kinds of pissed when you point out the obvious.
…about that thread on another board where you got your ass kicked by your fellow mongers. You then made a feeble attempt to claim you were just trying to draw out the trolls (like me?) even though I only posted on that board two times in the previous eight months. TWO TIMES IN EIGHT MONTHS!!!!
ROFLMAO!!!
trolling me with a controversial OP, and you ended up looking like an idiot. If it happened the way you say, you would have provided the link.
Posting or not, it just proved you cruise the boards every day looking for SOMETHING you can troll me on. You can't help yourself. You may have posted only twice in eight months, but how is that you posted on my troll bait the day after I put it up? Just in the neighborhood on other business and stumbled across it? I'm surprised you would want to even bring this up after you walked into my trap. CKS was right there and even told everyone I was joking around. You STILL couldn't resist the ad hominem attack. It's who you are. Go eat a chocolate pie and calm down big boy.
”The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
CKS175 was the ONLY one who thought you were joking. And he only said it because he’s your personal white knight. The others thought your OP was despicable. Since you never admit you were wrong, you tried to spin it and failed miserably. When that didn’t work, you attacked your fellow K-monger simply for seeing through your bullshit. Another despicable act - attacking a fellow VETERAN K-monger who never had a disagreement with you in 13 years on the K-girl board. There’s one word which describes you best - despicable. P
How many times is he going to cram “despicable” into one post?
Well here’s the TLDR (Too Long Didn’t Read) version for those who can’t be bothered to saunter over to the KGirl Forum to figure out what BigP is whining about.
Some one posted about a young Korean actress committing suicide at the KGirl forum. CDL posted, on a fuck board dedicated to the subject fucking Korean women, a somewhat crude joke about working as a KGirl provider being a better alternative than suicide (in the “too soon?” genre of humor). BigPapaTroll and another troll pounced, but they ended up with egg on their face. Now he’s trying to resurrect the issue in another forum (a violation of TER TOS mind you) and expecting to find sympathetic ears here. Not gonna happen, nobody’s listening.
BigP has absolutely NOTHING to contribute to a fuk board. He has ZERO reason to be here other than to be a troll.
He is NOTHING but and internet troll AND a stalker. He has stalked my posts outside this board plenty of times. Hes infatuated with trying to get one ober on cdl, all the while cdl constantly makes bigp the troll look like a fool EVERY time. And You guys think I'm making it up when I say he's working that 3rd shift. But he damn sure is. And he knows we know. He wants you to believe he's living the high life in Beverly Hills. BULLSHIT! He hasn't worked in 20 years. ( he loves using that line) BULLSHIT. He's working 3rd shift tonight. He can't post anything when the rest of us do because his lazy basement living ass is asleep from trolling half the night. He gets all wound up because the rest of us can fuck a Kgirl any time we damn well please and HE CAN'T!!
And to top it off, pathetically the only TWO people that EVER come to his defense is ickybiden and boobsman. What a fuck up crew that is. A troll, a pathological liar and a certifiably insane racist. Ain't that some shit.
I'm almost shocked that TER mods allows this troll to continue to lurk, but then again I'm not....
But SPOAT is the one who's been put on TER Mod time outs more than anyone else on this board.
Oh, right. That's all MY fault. LOL.
What a fucking dimwit and loser.
…committing suicide at the K-girl forum.”
“Some one (sic).” Are you too ChicKenShit to say who that “some one (sic)” was. Of course you are, ChicKenShit175. It was CDL who posted a despicable OP about the Korean actress committing suicide.
YOU were the ONLY poster who thought it was a joke because you’re a white knight coCKSucker. Some posters thought CDL’s post was despicable while others thought it was a good idea for her to become a K-girl.
Again, YOU were the only one who thought it was a joke. CDL glommed onto your post in a futile attempt to save his despicable ass.
So tell us, coCKSucker - was it a “joke” or was it a deliberate attempt to draw out a troll? And why would anyone in his right mind want to draw out a troll who had only posted on a board two times in eight months?
Now go suck CDl’s cock some more…it’s what you do best.
Are you sure that CDL was the original poster in that thread? Because I don’t think he was. His joke came as a comment down thread if my memory serves me correctly.
Apparently, YOU “can’t be bothered to saunter over to the KGirl forum” to see that CDL’s post is the ORIGINAL POST.
Your memory does NOT serve you correctly. CDL posted the OP. Then he doubled down and tripled down on his despicable OP.
You’re trying to appear like a fucking moron by claiming CDL’s post was a “comment down thread.” It’s simply more coCKSucking for CDL by you to deflect attention from CDL’s despicable OP.
You talk about the K-girl board as if you rarely go there. But you’re a K-monger with over 300 posts on the K-girl board. Your phony claim about your memory is just more righty bullshit.
If you want to try to litigate an old thread from another forum, it’s on you to provide the link to said thread. Just admit you put together a poorly constructed and unsourced argument and leave it at that. You seem to pick the oddest hills to die on.
I think that this is the thread being discussed. CDL was the OP.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girls-113/south-korean-actress-netflix-star------38771
South Korean actress, Netflix star . . . .
coeur-de-lion
posted 2/18/2025 #:02 #M
(I won't repost the content here.)
If you want to try to litigate an old thread from another forum, it’s on you to provide the link to said thread. Just admit you put together a poorly constructed and unsourced argument and leave it at that. You seem to pick the oddest hills to die on.
Thanks, Imp.
“I’m a fucking moron who doesn’t know how to find CDL’s OP even though I posted in that thread myself. And BTW, I’ve NEVER asked a fellow righty to post a link because I’m too ChicKenShit.
I might expound more later, but it’s weird you’ve jumped across forums to rage on about a silly joke. Could have left the thread to Imp’s amicable conclusion, but you jump right back In seemingly hyperventilating in a profanity laced rant.
…who thought it was a joke. And you keep repeating it in an effort to make it true. CDL was trying to weasel his way out of his despicable OP. When he read your post he jumped on it and in his best impersonation of Jon Lovitz’s SNL character Tommy Flanagan said: “Yeah, it was a joke; that’s the ticket!”
BTW, ChicKenShit, how was it a “silly joke?” Since when is a tragic SUICIDE a “silly joke?”
Jensen saw it was a joke, Lopaw saw it as a “ridiculous” joke. They were both critical of the joke. It was clearly a joke, albeit one that didn’t land very well. The fact that you’re unable to recognize that tells us that you have a very limited understanding of humor.
But again, who cares? What’s your obsession with a minor thread over in another forum?Why revive your silly debate here? It’s really pointless and if you really think it’s that important, why don’t you revive that old thread over there rather than stalk folks over here?
When I said you had a lock on troll of the year, just like you have for the last 15 years, and here you are, many days later, still beating a dead horse and proving what I said to be true.
Technically, this is the SECOND board you were baited on and couldn't resist taking the bait. This should be a warning to all of the budding troll wannabe's on TER, don't EVER count the master troll out in the running for Troll of the Year. Lol
CKS don't forget bigp is not only a troll but a stalker too. He spends ds all night scanning old posts to see what he can dredge up. With his stalker mentality I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't keep a notebook full of notes and dates on all yall so he can easily refer back.
And also.......
You noticed he had no rebuttal for my post earlier and of coursr right on cue one of the ONLY 2 freak jobs that ever back him up, came running up again with the same ol uhhhhh "pot calling kettle black.....pot calling kettle black" post. He wasted no time being bigp the troll's white night as usual.
have to go back to 2019 to see us at each other's throat. Then there was another year of disagreement before he changed his username to the current one, but you probably don't remember what the old name was, so your ignorance about our history invalidates your "points" such as they are. As I suggested, his frequent meltdowns with rocket have changed him a lot. Fun is out, serious is in.
You're just jealous because CKS is a lot smarter than you and he picked up on my scheme while you didn't have a clue. Once a troll, always a troll. I'll do it again sometime, just to show everyone how you can't resist taking the bait. You are a great source of entertainment and laughter here, especially when you think you have a "Gotcha" and then fail miserably.
…the one where the numbers came AFTER the name instead of BEFORE?
ROFLMAO at your stupidity!
How about LOPAW, a WOMAN? She said your post was RIDICULOUS. Why didn’t your thin-skinned, butt-hurt loser ass attack LOPAW?
In this instance, Boobsman’s death wish was directed solely at Willy. But in the past few days he’s been posting death threats directed at Trump, MAGA in general, and conservatives posting here. It would not surprise me if law enforcement gets involved if the moderators don’t step in and take action against Boobsman soon.
Laffy-like death spiral.