The problem is the Jewish Prime minister acting like a entitled crybaby.
Then turning around and expecting our tax payers dollars to protect his country!
President Obama signed a bill giving this asshole thirty eight billion dollars
in military aid back in September.
So he doesn't get everything he wants and acts like a ungrateful bitch.
The Jewish people are not the problem.
It's this two face asshole that is the problem and he needed to be embarrassed!
Posted By: DoctorGonzo
A compilation of thoughts and observations:
Do the "Palestinians" Really Want a State? No, not really.
In all the focus on the December 23rd vote at the UN Security Council the question of underlying Palestinian motives has not been addressed. It should be. In fact, it’s the key to the whole exercise.
First, the Palestinians have rejected one offer after another for a peaceful settlement in the past nearly 70 years. Second, their misguided actions now make any chance of an accord even less likely.
If the goal was to increase the chance of Palestinian statehood alongside Israel (and not in its place), the effort was an abysmal failure, despite the lopsided vote. Those diplomats who rushed to applaud the outcome should think twice about what they actually achieved.
If they wanted to excoriate Israel, a longstanding vocation of too many UN member states, then they can thump their chests. But for those truly committed to advancing prospects for peace, they took a big step backwards, once again falling into the Palestinian trap.
There is no such thing as Israel's "pre-1967 borders"
With Friday’s UN Vote, the international body and Barack Obama were basically saying that any Jewish community outside the “pre-1967 borders” is in "occupied Palestinian territory."
What they won’t admit because of their anti-Israel bias is that there is no such thing as pre-1967 borders. That “green line” running through the West Bank is the 1949 Armistice Line.
The armistice line was created solely because that’s Israeli and Arab forces stopped fighting at the end of the War of Independence (with some added adjustments in certain sectors).Therefore that 1949 line, that people call 1967 border is really only a military line.In fact, 1949 Armistice Agreement with the Jordanians explicitly specified that the line that was designated did not compromise any future territorial claims of the two parties, since it had been “dictated by exclusively by military considerations.” Of course the Jordanian rationale for that clause was to allow them to claim territory inside the armistice line for their very own.
Even if the Palestinians were to change their minds about wiping the Jewish State off the map (they never have), there would remain another major barrier to Israel reverting to the pre-June 1967 borders….they do not exist!
Even UN Resolution 242 which was passed by the UN Security Council five months after the Six-Day War recognized that the 1949 Armistice line was not supposed to designate final Israeli borders.
Now if only the outgoing President had bothered to heed his own advice.
-- Modified on 12/26/2016 8:22:39 PM
This, just everything that he's done in his presidency, is purely personal shit and is a parting shot at the guy that he couldn't get along with, just like the coup d'etat that his main girl Victoria Nuland organized in Ukraine was done to stick it to Putin who showed (and still shows) our Barry no respect.
Barry wants to dress it up as some sort of a policy thing but in reality it isn't much; just a hysteria fit from a disappointed 55 going on 16 year old, diminished to kissing ass of his successor (who he secretly abhors) due to the paranoia that his 8 years in power just may end up amounting to not a thing.
Barry doesn't have and never had much of a foreign policy, just a lot of loosely knit wishful thinking projects warmed up by his not so much hidden pro-Muslim sympathies that brought so much happiness to Libyan people and gave us (oops!) Civil War in Syria and both Arabs and Jews looking to Moscow for answers. 80% of what Barry's done will be overturned by his successor who if not for Barry and his shallow ignorant followers like you would've never gotten to where he is now! If that's not a proof of the failed presidency I don't know what is!
Every Trumpanzee should hang BHO portrait on his wall next to their furher's portrait because if it wouldn't be for all the childishness of Obama years and to the lesser extent pure evil of Bush years Trump would've never made it to presidency. For all you know there would have never been Brexit too and whatever else is to follow, like maybe fascists back in power in Germany? Imagine that?! Thank you Barry we owe you big time for all of this - we love you man!
So I can understand, why you twist the facts so much.
Since your cult leader Trump taught you very well.
President Obama should have withheld that Jewish military aid too.
The Israel Prime Minister is the problem and always has been.
Russia now has a real puppet working with them and his name is Trump.
Putin can't wait to get those Obama sanctions removed by his new puppet.
You and the rest of the Obama haters will soon see who was right.
Most smart people in this country knows, Trump will be a failure.
He got almost three million less votes than Clinton.
This says everything about Trump.
Posted By: Nnoway
This, just everything that he's done in his presidency, is purely personal shit and is a parting shot at the guy that he couldn't get along with, just like the coup d'etat that his main girl Victoria Nuland organized in Ukraine was done to stick it to Putin who showed (and still shows) our Barry no respect.
Barry wants to dress it up as some sort of a policy thing but in reality it isn't much; just a hysteria fit from a disappointed 55 going on 16 year old, diminished to kissing ass of his successor (who he secretly abhors) due to the paranoia that his 8 years in power just may end up amounting to not a thing.
Barry doesn't have and never had much of a foreign policy, just a lot of loosely knit wishful thinking projects warmed up by his not so much hidden pro-Muslim sympathies that brought so much happiness to Libyan people and gave us (oops!) Civil War in Syria and both Arabs and Jews looking to Moscow for answers. 80% of what Barry's done will be overturned by his successor who if not for Barry and his shallow ignorant followers like you would've never gotten to where he is now! If that's not a proof of the failed presidency I don't know what is!
Every Trumpanzee should hang BHO portrait on his wall next to their furher's portrait because if it wouldn't be for all the childishness of Obama years and to the lesser extent pure evil of Bush years Trump would've never made it to presidency. For all you know there would have never been Brexit too and whatever else is to follow, like maybe fascists back in power in Germany? Imagine that?! Thank you Barry we owe you big time for all of this - we love you man!
-- Modified on 12/27/2016 6:07:52 AM
... Trump was the better pick.
Face it the world does not like Barack Obama.
Only the naive believe national election votes are tallied.
Posted By: bigguy30
So I can understand, why you twist the facts so much.
Since your cult leader Trump taught you very well.
President Obama should have withheld that Jewish military aid too.
The Israel Prime Minister is the problem and always has been.
Russia now has a real puppet working with them and his name is Trump.
Putin can't wait to get those Obama sanctions removed by his new puppet.
You and the rest of the Obama haters will soon see who was right.
Most smart people in this country knows, Trump will be a failure.
He got almost three million less votes than Clinton.
This says everything about Trump.
Posted By: Nnoway
This, just everything that he's done in his presidency, is purely personal shit and is a parting shot at the guy that he couldn't get along with, just like the coup d'etat that his main girl Victoria Nuland organized in Ukraine was done to stick it to Putin who showed (and still shows) our Barry no respect.
Barry wants to dress it up as some sort of a policy thing but in reality it isn't much; just a hysteria fit from a disappointed 55 going on 16 year old, diminished to kissing ass of his successor (who he secretly abhors) due to the paranoia that his 8 years in power just may end up amounting to not a thing.
Barry doesn't have and never had much of a foreign policy, just a lot of loosely knit wishful thinking projects warmed up by his not so much hidden pro-Muslim sympathies that brought so much happiness to Libyan people and gave us (oops!) Civil War in Syria and both Arabs and Jews looking to Moscow for answers. 80% of what Barry's done will be overturned by his successor who if not for Barry and his shallow ignorant followers like you would've never gotten to where he is now! If that's not a proof of the failed presidency I don't know what is!
Every Trumpanzee should hang BHO portrait on his wall next to their furher's portrait because if it wouldn't be for all the childishness of Obama years and to the lesser extent pure evil of Bush years Trump would've never made it to presidency. For all you know there would have never been Brexit too and whatever else is to follow, like maybe fascists back in power in Germany? Imagine that?! Thank you Barry we owe you big time for all of this - we love you man!
-- Modified on 12/27/2016 6:07:52 AM
...to failed president whose only positive legacy will end up being that he was a first black president. That's why I and many others voted for him in 2008, and that's the only reason why you love him so much! Other then that good riddance and God's speed to Obama=Bush III - two fucked up presidents in a row.
I hope this third one will be better although I have some serious doubts because you know what they say about three strikes, eh?
America had a chance to elect a reasonable manager to keep the boat going steady instead it elected another "outsider" (that would make it two in a row) who'd have to go through some serious OJT, like if the one we have now wasn't enough.
Obama sucked dude, sucked big time, just like Bush before him did. Obama's nation was an obamination. Facts (and not your dubious stats for idiots) show it beyond any reasonable doubt! You just refuse to see it because you're blinded by the fact that he's the first black president!
with the question of whether the Green Line marks Israel’s border – and that is not Mr. Obama’s position
“With Friday’s UN Vote, the international body and Barack Obama were basically saying that any Jewish community outside the “pre-1967 borders” is in "occupied Palestinian territory."
But that is true, isn’t it? Israel acquired this territory as the result of war. The Israeli government itself treated the territory as “occupied Palestinian territory” – the military ran the territory and the Pallys were not given the full rights of Israeli citizens.
And under the Fourth Geneva Convention, settlements built on territory acquired by war are illegal. Do you disagree? So until the parties negotiate actual borders, the settlements are illegal under international law.
And while you are correct that the Green Line was not meant to be a border, Mr. Obama has been quite clear that he agrees with that. Mr. Obama does not consider the Green Line to be a border but simply what it is – a line. And his position is that the actual border should be determined by the parties “by the 1967 line with mutually agreed swaps.”
"And it was my reference to the 1967 lines – with mutually agreed swaps – that received the lion’s share of the attention, including just now. And since my position has been misrepresented several times, let me reaffirm what “1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps” means. By definition, it means that the parties themselves – Israelis and Palestinians – will negotiate a border that is different from the one that existed on June 4, 1967. That’s what mutually agreed-upon swaps means. It is a well-known formula to all who have worked on that issue for a generation. It allows the parties themselves to account for the changes that have taken place over the last 44 years. It allows the parties themselves to take account of those changes, including the new demographic realities on the ground, and the needs of both sides."
So what is wrong with his view? Start with these lines and then negotiate the border to reflect the changes that have taken place over the last 48 years. The resolution also says "lines" - not borders.
Notwithstanding Dershowitz’s false claim that the resolution prevents praying at the West Wall, the resolution simply essentially confirms what the Geneva Convention says and still leaves the question of borders to negotiation by the parties. But until these borders are negotiated Isael is an occupying power and the settlements ARE illegal.
Posted By: DoctorGonzo
A compilation of thoughts and observations:
Do the "Palestinians" Really Want a State? No, not really.
In all the focus on the December 23rd vote at the UN Security Council the question of underlying Palestinian motives has not been addressed. It should be. In fact, it’s the key to the whole exercise.
First, the Palestinians have rejected one offer after another for a peaceful settlement in the past nearly 70 years. Second, their misguided actions now make any chance of an accord even less likely.
If the goal was to increase the chance of Palestinian statehood alongside Israel (and not in its place), the effort was an abysmal failure, despite the lopsided vote. Those diplomats who rushed to applaud the outcome should think twice about what they actually achieved.
If they wanted to excoriate Israel, a longstanding vocation of too many UN member states, then they can thump their chests. But for those truly committed to advancing prospects for peace, they took a big step backwards, once again falling into the Palestinian trap.
There is no such thing as Israel's "pre-1967 borders"
With Friday’s UN Vote, the international body and Barack Obama were basically saying that any Jewish community outside the “pre-1967 borders” is in "occupied Palestinian territory."
What they won’t admit because of their anti-Israel bias is that there is no such thing as pre-1967 borders. That “green line” running through the West Bank is the 1949 Armistice Line.
The armistice line was created solely because that’s Israeli and Arab forces stopped fighting at the end of the War of Independence (with some added adjustments in certain sectors).Therefore that 1949 line, that people call 1967 border is really only a military line.In fact, 1949 Armistice Agreement with the Jordanians explicitly specified that the line that was designated did not compromise any future territorial claims of the two parties, since it had been “dictated by exclusively by military considerations.” Of course the Jordanian rationale for that clause was to allow them to claim territory inside the armistice line for their very own.
Even if the Palestinians were to change their minds about wiping the Jewish State off the map (they never have), there would remain another major barrier to Israel reverting to the pre-June 1967 borders….they do not exist!
Even UN Resolution 242 which was passed by the UN Security Council five months after the Six-Day War recognized that the 1949 Armistice line was not supposed to designate final Israeli borders.
Now if only the outgoing President had bothered to heed his own advice.
-- Modified on 12/26/2016 8:22:39 PM
