I saw that report on TV last night, HOW can any of you Bush supporters back this action ?

They know if they act and the TV's in America show heavy US troop casualties (which IT WOULD) that Bush's approval would go down and in this tight race Bush can't afford to have that happen.

HOWEVER, what does that say about BUSH, and the actions and principles behind the Iraq war ? Plain and simple Bush lied to get in there, and he's lying to you today. The costs involved in human life and financial burden are simply a means by which Bush is making his buddies in the Oil & Energy companies, and companies like Halliburton & Carlyle Group EXTREMELY wealthy, and the average American tax payer is paying for it with his wallet and his life. If Bush REALLY gave a rats ass about terrorism, why didn't he finish the job going after Usama Bin Laden, why doesn't he do a better job securing our own boarders and checking what and who comes and goes to and from this country ? Bush is on record saying 'he doesn't know or care where Usama Bin Laden is, he doesn't think much about him anymore, and it's a non issue for him anymore', of course it is, BECAUSE the AMERICAN PEOPLE have NOT held G.W. BUSH, (or anyone in his administration for that matter) accountable for his failings as of yet ! ! !  Come November 2nd, I HOPE we DO !

SHAME on you MR. BUSH, I refuse to call him president, and there should be an asterisk along side his name in the history books.

------------

http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/reports/binladen.htm
- This link details/outlines some basic info the CNS knew about Usama (Osama) Bin Laden, funny how Iraq was not part of it.
(ok 1 small mention, a former Iraqi was on Bin Laden's payroll, but hardly a "Connection" between Iraq & Bin Laden.

http://www.fbi.gov/mostwant/topten/fugitives/laden.htm
- Another thing I find rather ODD, the FBI site doesn't
seem to be up to date, or do they not think Osama was behind the 9/11 attacks ? What are they NOT telling us ?

But I also would not rule them out.  My one concern, given the nature or terrorists, is that they never confront a superior force directly.  Most of them probaly slipped out of Samara when the assualt on that city started.  With this in mind and with a lull in US offensive activity against them, I am concerned that they will have enough leeway to engineer a sizeable terrorist strike against out troops on the order of the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut or the bombing of Cobalt Towers in Saudi Arabia, if something even close to either of those attacks happens then the policy change would have been a massive and tragic mistake.