Write Review
1,983,106 Total Reviews 3,942 New Reviews
6,885 Users Online

Politics and Religion

I didn’t watch the interview…
willywonka4u 22 Reviews 30 reads
posted

…because why bother. How many dickless wonders do you need to hear talk about “toxic masculinity” before you know that they’re just doing it so their wives will give them a pity handjob.

cks175243 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4621 reads

It was many years ago. His wife is a strong supporter of his. Meanwhile, Trump was fucking a porn star right after Melania gave birth to Barron. And you don't care about that.

ReplyQuoteReport
durran42132 reads

Same thing we say about you.....

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4629 reads

The SPOAT is now reduced to content-free stalker posts. What an achievement.

ReplyQuoteReport
lester_prairie20 reads

Kamala had an affair with a married man. Her husband was a married man that had an affair. It's like they were made for each other.

ReplyQuoteReport
RespectfulRobert28 reads

And to prove it, Trump paid her $130,000 and his then wife was NOT pregnant, correct Lester?

ReplyQuoteReport
zenshouse24 reads

None of this bs has anything to do with whether either candidate will be a good president. Move on.

ReplyQuoteReport
LostSon30 reads

Posted By: Zeel
Re: Pointless
None of this bs has anything to do with whether either candidate will be a good president. Move on.
Yep your right and Camel-a will be a shitty President.  

Why you ask? After she was appointed the border czar (and she was) she did Jack and shit to stop the massive flow of illegals across the border.

ReplyQuoteReport
RespectfulRobert25 reads

This should be good.

ReplyQuoteReport
cks17526 reads

I think the impact will be minimal, if any. I can see a SuperPAC running a very dark attack ad that ties that episode in Emhoff’s life in with other negative attacks. He’s not the candidate, but the Emhoff scandal could be used as a counter to attacks on Trump’s scandals by trying to create an “everybody does it” underlying message in such an ad.

At some point, Trump or more likely one of his more radical surrogates (think Laura Loomer) might start asking what happened to the baby? Late term abortion? Put up for adoption?

ReplyQuoteReport
lester_prairie26 reads

The Dems were happy to make an issue of Stormy Daniels when it was Trump vs Biden.  Once mistress Kamala got the nod and now with her hubby doing the dirty too, suddenly it's irrelevant. They have no principles. They are NPC -- whatever the party tells them to think.

ReplyQuoteReport
impposter37 reads

"The Dems were happy to make an issue of Stormy Daniels ..." but only to point out Trump's "Christian faith (Thou shalt not commit adultery)" and "family values" hypocrisy.  
.
The REAL issue was Trump's falsification of business records for the purpose of covering up his dalliance with Stormy for the purpose of influencing the election. That also involved campaign finance fraud,  listing the Cohen reimbursement expenses as "legal fees" for the Trump Org business instead of listing it as a campaign expense. (That still might lead to charges of Federal Tax fraud for Trump Org.) Another issue was Pecker planning with Trump for Pecker to pay off McDougal to "catch and kill" her story of her affair with Trump ... and not listing that payoff as an unreported (hence, illegal) campaign donation. (Pecker expected to be reimbursed by Trump but ... Trump pay a debt? LOL!)  
.
The Reps played "But what about!!!!" some celebrities who also paid to "catch and kill" or to cover up stories about their affairs but were not charged with crimes!! Why not? Because they weren't violating election laws or business finance laws when they did so!

Posted By: lester_prairie
Re: Let's hear your response to that question.
The Dems were happy to make an issue of Stormy Daniels when it was Trump vs Biden.  Once mistress Kamala got the nod and now with her hubby doing the dirty too, suddenly it's irrelevant. They have no principles. They are NPC -- whatever the party tells them to think.

ReplyQuoteReport
cks17518 reads

If you knew you’d gotten your nanny pregnant and it had ended your first marriage, would you decide you needed to lecture other men on toxic masculinity? That’s what Kamala’s husband did. These woke dudes are always so full of shit:
I get it, no one’s perfect. Personally I would rather have a president who screws an intern — Clinton — than one who screws the entire country — Biden. But if you banged your nanny and got her pregnant wouldn’t you think maybe morally lecturing men on ethics wasn’t your lane?

Interesting video of Emhoff on MSNBC linked below:

Related Link: Emhoff Talks About Toxic Masculinity

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u31 reads

…because why bother. How many dickless wonders do you need to hear talk about “toxic masculinity” before you know that they’re just doing it so their wives will give them a pity handjob.

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!