Now she’s claiming it’s a political attack on her 😂

She blamed racism and sexism from the pulpit of a church last week.

CNN's legal expert, Elie Honig, was ripping her the other day and he usually refrains from being too harsh on anyone as he is more laid back and not a hot take guy. This woman is handing Trump a gift. The problem is this is a state case so he cant pardon himself, although I realize there is great debate on whether Trump can pardon himself against the federal charges. One wouldn't think so but with this SCOTUS? Who knows????

Her personal behavior is unprofessional and unacceptable. However, that has nothing to do with the ligitimacy of the RICO charges filed against trump and his allies. Two or more things can be true at the same time.

Routine contact with WH counsel's office does not prove that anything untoward happened. It's been reported that the contact was procedural with respect to contacting former WH officials. Why must you immediately jump to conclusions and assume the worst? Oh wait. I know. Never mind.

Did you ever listen to the phone call with Trump and the REPUBLICANS who ran the GA election? He tells them to go find 11,000 votes LONG AFTER the vote was certified. Yet again he wanted democracy overturned and decent Republicans, who put country first and dont have Trump worship fever, are diming him out and I love it!

I realize this is impossible for you to accept, however it seems to most objective observers that trump is trying hard to put himself in jail. He is credibly accused of 91 criminal counts in 4 separate indictments by both federal, state, and county career prosecutors. These prosecutors have all found compelling evidence and probable cause of criminal activity not political activity. Cry all you want about it being a 'witch hunt', but it is all about law enforcement and accountability.

Deflection and whataboutism are your stock-in-trade. It's what you do. It's who you are. It's pathetic.

Projection

That's all you got. Plus a little schoolyard name calling and misunderstanding about what projection really is. I could explain it to you but you would never understand.  

Anything to move the conversation away from trump's 91 criminal charges in 4 separate criminal indictments. Deflection and whataboutism is what you always do.

Trump found liable by jury for sexual assault and defamation - judgment $5 million.  
Trump found liable by jury for defamation - judgment $83.3 million including $65 million in punitive damages.  
Trump found to have committed business fraud in a bench trial  - judgment is pending.
Trump has been criminally indicted by 4 grand juries. He has been charged with 91 criminal counts - those trials are pending.  

Cite several of your so-called "experts." You can't. But I'll bet you can find a few right-wing legal hacks. So go ahead.
Or maybe, as usual, you've got nothing.
I'm in Raiatea now and I'm waiting.

From the article.  

"it's been reported, are you referring to the reporting by CNN and MSDNC?

I thought this was a thread about the Georgia prosecutor and the charges filed against trump and his allies not about what you think is wrong in the United States today.  I don't have the time, patience, or interest to address your firehose of grievances.

All that I'm "hell bent on" is seeing that justice prevails regardless of political party and political ideology. If you are as clairvoyant as you claim, shouldn't you know that? I guess you missed that along with the dumpster fire that exists in the foreground of the MAGA cult.

Actually they are not "hearings" - they are trials, a formal examination of evidence before a judge and jury, for both criminal indictments and civil litigation.  Theses legal actions are the responsibility of the  judicial branch of our government.  The legislative and executive branches have the responsibility of the governing of the country. We are capable of both governing and law enforcement at the same time.

Sounds like you have already decided that's she's corrupt and that she should be fired based on unproven allegations. Isn't she entitled to due process or is that just for the individuals that she indicated?

What are you talking about? I haven't convicted trump. However, a federal judge in New York has determined trump committed business fraud and is deliberating on the financial damages of trump's fraud. Two juries in New York have decided trump is liable for sexual assault and defamation. Trump has been indicted criminally by four grand juries, but those cases are pending. Trump is getting due process. Constitutionally he's innocent until proven guilty. Why are you so angry, so emotional, and so irrational? Just curious.

He hates it when someone points out when he's fibbing. Which is always.

So let's be clear here.  You are okay with calling DA Willis corrupt and calling for her firing based on nothing more than unproven allegations.  However, your strong and visceral reaction to the recitation of trump's civil litigation losses and pending criminal charges is: I'm insane for bringing it up.  Do you think that your "but trump" argument makes his civil and criminal historical record disappear? Do you think that even if DA Willis acted unethically in her personal and professional behavior, that the grand jury indictment against trump and his allies in Georgia should somehow be dismissed?

Do you ever listen to yourself?  In your mind she's corrupt because the allegations have been "shown to be true" when they remain unproven claims. But when it comes to trump, you believe that all allegations against him, even when a grand jury has found probable cause, are politically motivated and therefore cannot be true. Further, even when a judge or jury has ruled against him based on evidence presented in a court of law, you still think it's politically motivated and unjustified.  Your thinking, such as it is, is convoluted, flawed, and senseless.

Willis has acknowledged a personal relationship with a prosecutor hired to manage the RICO case. That  conduct is likely unethical and, to me personally, unacceptable but not a reason to have the RICO charges dismissed. The existence of a personal relationship between members of a prosecution team, in an of itself, does not entitle any of the remaining 15 criminal defendants (4 of the 19 originally charged have already pleaded guilty) to any remedy.  Calm down.

We all know, or should know, that trump, and the other 14 remaining defendants, have been indicted by a Georgia grand jury and are awaiting trial. Our judicial system gives those defendants the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law. So what's your point? I hope you have something other to offer than your usual "but trump" defense.

Trump and his allies have been criminally indicted by a grand jury for actions related to attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Willis has been accused of what may be ethics violations and unprofessional behavior. The two are not equal. The two are not related. Your attempt to equate and connect these two disparate matters shows how desperate you are to exonerate trump at all costs. I think that is pathetic as well.

Indeed we do reside in different silos and perhaps on different worlds. Condemning the left for exactly what is being done by the right is play number 1 in the MAGA playbook. Projection, deflection, hypocrisy - rinse and repeat. I agree that stupid is unfixable - at least you know that much - however when it comes to self-awareness not so much. It will be a pleasure ceasing communications with you.  It hasn't been a fair fight anyway and now it's getting boring. Now be a man of your word unless you have so little self-control that you have to take another parting shot.

The 'last word' was your pronunciation but you couldn't stay away very long, could you?  Is your word so meaningless or are you so easily triggered with no impulse control, or both? Sounds like a certain criminal defendant who owes the woman he sexually assaulted and repeatedly defamed $88 million. Oh no, there's another unflattering reference to your Dear Leader. How dare I go there. Let's face it slick you are on the wrong side of history when it comes to your adoration of that 88 million dollar poorer, four time indicted, criminal defendant and you are factually and intellectually disadvantaged when it comes to this debate. Please stop embarrassing yourself. But I suspect you won't.

Well that has to be one of your more ridiculous arguments - and your litany is long and derisive to begin with. So anyone who speeds, or doesn't use a turn signal, or crosses the street against the signal light, or spits on the sidewalk, or a million other minor infractions is corrupt by your definition. And if we have all done something trivial like that then we are all corrupt and none of us should hold public office or a position of public trust. Your argument, like your politics, is extreme right-wing absurdity.

Though it's also true his word is "meaningless." But still it's fun triggering him (like this) and watching him dance. Like how I've gotten him to lose his mind by pointing out I'm in Tahiti.
By the way, I still am. Currently docked in Taha'a after a morning of snorkeling.
Now watch Piñata-Boy dance.
PS: he only started his "last word" routine after I serially ridiculed hm for it. He repeats everything I say. What a predictable 'tard.

…the attempt to disqualify her.  Where’s CDL with his usual (and ONLY) Shakespeare quote:
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

-- Modified on 2/5/2024 6:40:13 AM

No need to shout.  It doesn't make your argument any more convincing.  There is such a thing as prosecutorial discretion, but let's put that aside for the moment. Since you mentioned trump, using your same logic, doesn't his corruption disqualify him in becoming president? Doesn't the president take an oath to ensure that laws are faithfully executed? Doesn't the Attorney General report to the president making the president the highest level law enforcer. Trump has been found liable by a federal judge and two federal juries of sexual assault, defamation, and business fraud so isn't that inconsistent with becoming the highest level enforcer of the law? How do you overlook all of that?

While Nicky and I may be like-minded (and we both beat your ass like a drum) we are not the same person. Now let's get back on track and give Lost (in Space) an opportunity to answer my questions about his deductive reasoning and jurisprudence.

Page count is the old way to judge judicial merit.  Now they do it by tonnage.

He apparently has no clue about many things, including the fact that it's against the rules of this board to post under two different handles/aliases on the same thread. Actually, it's grounds for banning. And TER would sniff it out in an instant if it were true.
Now watch Piñata Boy scurry to the Mods to get us banned.
And fail.

You sure love your conspiracy theories, don't you? Observing your certainty, obtained without a scintilla of evidence from, at best, the nether regions of your grey matter, tells me all I need to know about your "intellectual" process. Or perhaps this is just the best distraction that you thought would permit you to go on the attack without getting your ideas rebuked and ridiculed. Guess what? Didn't work. Still waiting for Lost (at sea) to answer my questions.

Did Willis fuck up? YEP. Big time. Her appointment of a guy with whom she was having a relationship was a gross error of judgment.
Does it have ANYTHING to do with the merits of the case? NOPE.
She should withdraw and let the case itself go forward and be decided on the basis of the law and the evidence.  
Are our resident righty clowns capable of discerning the differences here? That would be a resounding NO.
They are truly a bunch of Bozos.

So maybe durran and lost are the same guy. Mind you I have no evidence to support this but it has to be true, right?  Too many moronic coincidences. Durran once wrote in reply to me "what are we in the 9th grade?" Who would have known that 'we' perhaps referred to both his profiles and that '9th grade' was aspirational because it appears he/they never got out of kindergarten? I'm still waiting for a reply directly from Lost (in translation) - durran please stay away from posting and go play with the other children. Jazz (not to be confused with Nicky).

You'd think some of his righty pals would clue him in but it seems they enjoy laughing at him, too.
And here he comes.....

I know. This would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic. I recently began reading some of the reopened P&R  posts to understand present day MAGA madness and to occasionally argue against its insanity. Enter durran. I was pummeling his ass so badly he creates a diversionary conspiracy theory to distract from all his losing.  So trumpian. He can't win arguments with you, and now he is losing arguments with me, so if he says we are the same person so he's only losing to you. Sad but in his MAGA drunk mind he's winning again, or at least not losing as much.  Debating with MAGA minions is like playing chess with a pigeon - eventually the pigeon shits on the board and struts around like he won.

Throwing shade, talking shit, acting delusional is all you got. No substance, no class, no intelligent thought.  You got nothing pigeon boy. Nothing.  We might as well close this thread because you've driven off the road and into the abyss.

It does pain me to lower myself to your sophomoric level, but I'm just trying to respond in language you might understand.  Keep shiting on the board and strutting like you won. You got nothing else.

Obviously, you don't know when to quit. I can keep this going all day, but you are boring me. Stop repeating yourself. Stop acting like won something. Stop acting so foolishly. What happened to your pledge to stop? Okay one last time - declare victory and disengage.

I don't have multiple accounts and never said I did. What I DID have were multiple aliases YEARS ago when that was permitted. That said, I don't give a damn what you believe though it would be nice if TER would simply confirm the truth: that jazz and I are different accounts. But they don't typically involve themselves in things this petty and stupid. That's you and your little buddy's job.