Politics and Religion

How nice.
JakeFromStateFarm 19 reads
posted

And I agree re trans athletes in competition. But I also note for the record that your answer in this case is totally inconsistent with your slavish support of Putin when he tries to influence our elections or when he jerks on Trump's leash and your boy barks.

JakeFromStateFarm147 reads

do you also support banning the Russian cheats from international sports? Or will you make excuses for them like you do for Putin's election interference?
You really are dopes. Or is it dupes?
Probably both. Dopey dupes.

ANYONE who uses performance-enhancing drugs (except Viagra, of course, but I wouldn't suggest using them in an Olympic event, especially the hurdles), I'm also against M-to-F transgender  athletes competing in female sports.  This is completely crooked and one-sided.  You don't see F-to-M transgender athletes, whether they have had an adadicktome or not, pushing to compete in male events, because they know they would not be competitive.  So I say the trans-males should have to compete as males, no matter what sex organs they have or what they look like.  A simple DNA test will reveal all.  

And I agree re trans athletes in competition. But I also note for the record that your answer in this case is totally inconsistent with your slavish support of Putin when he tries to influence our elections or when he jerks on Trump's leash and your boy barks.

OUTSIDE the four corners of your OP, you should have made it longer and included more disparate topics, like Laffy does.  Then I only pick the ONE that borders on intelligent to respond to.  

This was for your own good.
You should take my advice more often. Your life would be significantly less painful.

Is from laughing too hard at your posts.  Not because they're funny, but because its amusing to watch you struggle trying to make Laffy's slogans sound more intelligent coming from your mouth.   Each successive comeback you write gets weaker.  Its like the half-life of uranium.  Too bad you have pretty much given up trying to say something original.  You USED to be good at it.  

You must, since you do it continually. In this case your uranium analogy backfires on you.  Why?
The half-life of uranium-238 is about 4.47 billion years and that of uranium-235 is 704 million years.
So either way, you LOSE.
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Now THAT'S funny.

a different  time span.  Now, if only your memory had a half-life.  We can only wish.  

As for my memory, it is more than adequate to recall your many TOTAL failures.

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
You don't see F-to-M transgender athletes, whether they have had an adadicktome or not, pushing to compete in male events, because they know they would not be competitive.
Actually, you do.
.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-harvard-transgender-swimmer-schuyler-bailar/
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/05/ncaas-first-openly-transgender-swimmer-schuyler-bailar-finds-his-real-self-and-flourishes-at-harvard/
.
Schuyler was BEAUTIFUL before switching teams. Now, not so much.

She was maybe a "5" on the GaGa scale before she switched teams.  You really need to raise your standards a bit.

 
As for switching teams, CDL got caught in the trap of speaking in absolutes, almost every time a person uses the words "Always" or "Never" there is almost sure to be an example that proves him wrong. I will concede with his point that it's extremely rare for a F to M athlete to want to compete against the men, and that they certainly don't do so because they expect to have a competitive advantage as do MANY of the M to F athletes who compete against "real women".

 
As usual Matt and Trey nail it.

Register Now!