Any thoughts on the drivel the media has turned out on this cooked up contreversy in Cincinnati the other day. A local talk show host Bill Cunningham makes some critical comments about their darling Obama and turns it into an offense against all that is good and decent.
These creeps are so transparent. They pry every bit of any story that can be presented as something "racist" but when facts about Obama's affiliation with a Black separatist church come up they blissfully ignore it. They have no shame and could give a damn that they are transparent as hell to the thinking minority in this country. If it wasn't for the masses of millions of sheep in this country that cant see through it then perhaps we could get to the buisness of putting these aliens and traitors on trial, or perhaps we could just get the bonfires started now and invite them to the party as guests of honor...
I always chuckle when they try to paint pantywaists like Bill Cunningham as "extremists". These manipulators have no idea how many of us real extremists are out here who are up to here with their lies and manipulation..I would have to say that most of them will never see it coming....
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is a neccesity".....
you lambasting anyone else for using the "racist" card defense is laughable. Any comment regarding the total ignorance on your posts sends you off on the "anyone whoever dared point out my stupidity has always had to rely on doing nothing more than claiming I am an anti-semite" crap.
Hey my friend I am happy to be refered to as an anti-Semite....
That's Mr Anti-Semite to you.
Perhaps you might get lucky one day and catch a post where a person who actually wants to hear about things they have never heard from their Ziontube and thus will see documented linked facts about Zionist media control, Zionist manipulation of world events,etc.. Not going to do it for someone who is obviously unreachable and would probably side with America's and the West's enemies no matter what facts pass their way. I guess the only question is do you take up for them for tribal reasons or a seriously retarded ideology......hmmmmmm I wonder... My ideology is based on the premise that 2% of the American population should not run rough shot over the posterity of this nations founders...
-- Modified on 2/27/2008 6:48:46 PM
Zionists or Mohammedans (a/k/a ragheads). It's something I thought about a lot, until I figured out that Indiana Jones holds the answers. So I don't know why we don't elect him president.
Oh yes, now I remember - because you fuckers have to write me in for president, because I'm the only True Conservative left.
Let the Arabs (ragheads as you termed them) and Zionists fight it out amongst themselves. None of it should be our concern or the concern of Europeans. Let their wars fought to defend their megolomaniac superstitions be fought with the shedding of their own blood rather than ours..
I think not!! I think he jumped right in!! And if I recall, he made a few tons of money on those movies!! Or somebody did. They were pretty good movies. Except maybe he was a little tired by the time he got to Temple of Doom.
True sir.
But Indiana Jones wasn't handicapped by having PC concerns about killing all those brown people over there. We don't fight wars to win now,well except when we are killing our own kin over in Europe. Every war we have fought since WW2 has illustrated this.
Keep in mind that Indiana Jones wasn't controlled by a bunch of special interest money men (AIPAC)
I find it odd that the libs only look at words the right wing say as being wrong or "Politically" incorrect..Did anyone see the comedian doing the spoof on Obama's name Hussein before Cunningham?? and not a word was said because it was a left wing comedian..
Liberal Hypocrites
Yeah your right but the fact that Jon Stewart was able to get away with it has more to do with another issue rather than he being a liberal. He is part of another, how do you say, favored group of people....lol...This group never has or never will do anything wrong, of course this is only according to them...
Now let Zisk's denials begin .......NOW...
they're all liberal pansies. Liberal pansy is a really good thing to snort when I can't think of any answer to questions like, WTF do you think you're doing, fucking up the USA?!
Your correct that liberal pansies have had a negative affect on America.
The fact is however there have always been liberals with stupid ideas that are not in line with the laws of nature. When European civilization was healthy these people were laughed at and ignored.
Its the people who seized control of the media and utilized the development of TV and motion pictures to give these liberals the power to have influence over our national life. They are well aware of their distructive potential and have used it to their benefit.
When you talk about the liberals who seized control of the media you pretty much show your ignorance considering that the media in the U.S. is pretty much controlled such noted liberals as News Corp., Time Warner, General Electric, the Walt Disney Co., Viacom and Clear Channel Communications.
That according to you....
Jews control all the media
Jews control the world's money supply
Israel dictates US foreign policy
It is impossible to criticize you except by calling you anti-semitic?
or that you are completely ignorant?
well, there is no denying that last one.
Jews control all the flashy trikes, too!!
United States of Africa. Obama's Church is committed to:
#$ A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA (TUCC Mission Statement)
We are a congregation which is Unashamedly Black and Unapologetically Christian... Our roots in the Black religious experience and tradition are deep, lasting and permanent. We are an African people, and remain "true to our native land," the mother continent, the cradle of civilization. God has superintended our pilgrimage through the days of slavery, the days of segregation, and the long night of racism. It is God who gives us the strength and courage to continuously address injustice as a people, and as a congregation. We constantly affirm our trust in God through cultural expression of a Black worship service and ministries which address the Black Community.
This is what I call racism. Moreover, I am appalled at no one asking him about his church's commitment to Africa. I am sure he will brush it of saying he cannot control his pastor.
My question is, why didn't he leave the congregation if he didn't agree. Instead, he kept on going there for 20 plus years.
Now you know the MSM scared to bring it up.
It is scary, that none of his voters is concerned about this statement. It infuriates me.
Either Hillary will start calling him on it as a last ditch effort to win the nominaton, or the Republicans will in the GE.
"His" voters don't want to know, they don't want to be confused with the facts. Yhey are like little chidren that just want to be told that Father Government will take care of all their problems.
the little children are hoping the Hope Man will take care of all their problems and give them plenty of money without working.
Hope-Change Cool-Aid is new brand of cool aid we have never seen before.
it is however much more widespread now then it ever was. My fear is what will happen when the entitlement crowd votes in larger numbers than the productive members of society, if they make all the laws then what's to stop them from appropriating(stealing) all of our money.
it's absolutely amazing how everyone's missed the boat with this "story."
the problem with using, or not using, Senator Obama's middle name has little if anything to do with the fact that Obama is an African-American. It has everything to do with the fact that it's a Moslem -- read "Arab" here -- name.
Bill Cunningham's disparaging use of Obama's name plays right into the hands of AIPAC, the Likud, and the Israel Lobby generally, and they've already pretty much poisoned the minds of most of this country's unthinking, insensate, politically illiterate populace with toxic levels of hatred for the Pallys, the Arabs, and all Islamic types in general, without goofing on Obama's middle name or repeating it, mantra-like, in a blatantly transparent attempt to create a link between Obama and the so-called enemies we've been propagandized into hating for nearly half a century. I for one am glad that McCain disavowed Cunningham's disrespectful and invidious use of Obama's middle name, though probably not for the reasons i cite. And ask yerself -- would Cunningham or anyone else use it if it was, for example, Harolde?
Poor AIPACers -- they'll have to pull up another, different handful of mud to sling. No challenge whatsoever for that crew, to be sure.