Politics and Religion

Hmmm....
crsm27 32 Reviews 32 reads
posted
2 / 13

This really isn't that "new".

They knew the Dossier was fake, knew they kept using it to keep looking into Trump, etc.

What kind of is "new" is some of the Brennan stuff.  

I still don't see it directly linking Obama (also the whole immunity thing with presidential act).  Also need to see how it can be directly linked to Hilary..... right now so far it is still her campaign paid for it... and they used it to "blanket" the email "scandal".... that was about it.    The people who could be FUCKED are Brennan, Clapper, and Comey.

But then the issue will be the Investigation.... why did it take 2+ years?  With Mueller and what not?  The waste of time, resources, etc.  All of which they had this info that is being released right now.  Why did Schiff and other keep it going?

BUT ALSO TAKE THIS SOURCE WITH A GRAIN OF SALT....

marikod 1 Reviews 21 reads
posted
3 / 13

“Russia hoax” as a fact and blames  Hillary.

Let’s see - 37 indictments. Nine guilty pleas or jury convictions including six close Trump associates. I’d say we got our money’s worth from the Special Counsel.

And who appointed the Special Counsel? Was it Hillary? Any of those bad Democrats?

 Nope. It was Trump’s own DOJ headed by Republican Rod Rosenstein who found that the evidence then known met the standard for appointment of a special counsel.

        Mr. Mueller found “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign.” And Mueller did not rely on the Steele dossier.  If Trump had not dangled a pardon in front of Paul Manafort to prevent him from cooperating, I wonder if a Trump conspiracy could have been proven. Guess we will never know.

inicky46 61 Reviews 18 reads
posted
4 / 13

He is a consistent gobbler of Trumpian lies and has pledged allegiance to Putin.

crsm27 32 Reviews 15 reads
posted
5 / 13

There is more things possibly pointing towards hillary.... but nothing concrete yet.

 
Still more smoke and mirrors type shit.

 
What is happening is showing the actually cover up or knowing things were bullshit by the FBI and directors yet still going forward.  That is the issue at hand.

 
You bring up Mueller...... Remember Mueller wasn't involved with what they are talking about.  This is all about the original investigation and spying on Trump.  It is how they USED the Steel Dossier and knew it was FAKE to spy on Trump a political opponent.  To go after him.

 
You are confusing two things.   The reason why I was brought up Schiff and the others, is did they possibly HIDE this and drug on the whole investigation.... and didn't bring this stuff to light.  Which would have spearheaded other investigations.  You know into Comey, Brennan, etc.

marikod 1 Reviews 14 reads
posted
6 / 13

“What is happening is showing the actually cover up or knowing things were bullshit by the FBI and directors yet still going forward.  That is the issue at hand.”

Sorry but that is simply not true.  
 

 
The IG testified before Congress the FBI showed no political bias in investigating Trump for Russia connections. Durham after three and a half years, two acquittals, and low level FBI agent conviction for - gasp - altering an email to get a FISA warrant  likewise found only confirmation bias by the FBI. You will notice Willy is ignoring this but Durham did not fault the FBI for investigating Trump and Russia “knowing things were bullshit”. He concluded   only that the FBI should not have started with a “full” investigation but only a preliminary investigation. He faulted the FBI for a “lack of analytical rigor”- in other words they should have studied things more before opening the full investigation. You could say that about any agency decision. Mueller took over the investigation and found it was indeed warranted as noted by the indictments and convictions I listed. He neither charged nor exonerated Trump.

So where is the Trump Russia hoax? Shouldn’t we be talking about the hoax that the FBI had a political bias? Not according the IG and Durham.

inicky46 61 Reviews 17 reads
posted
7 / 13

I know you won't, but Mari is probably the most rational, fact-based and apolitical poster on this board. Ever.
But you won't care, Wanker, because you are a raving, biased lunatic and always will be.

marikod 1 Reviews 16 reads
posted
8 / 13

of the Clinton campaign, Democrat politicians,  Obama officials, and the media to use the Steele Dossier to smear Trump and gain political advantage  the “Russia Hoax, “ I have no problem with that. But this is NOT what Trump, and the usual Republican suspects call the Russian Hoax, and is not what I am talking about. From Wiki-

Durham's investigation was predicated on false claims by President Trump and his allies beginning in 2017 that the Russia investigation, code-named Crossfire Hurricane, was motivated by a conspiracy by U.S. intelligence or law enforcement agencies.[2] The investigation had found many questionable links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies and led to the Mueller investigation. The president said the probe was part of a deep state plot and a "hoax" or "witch hunt" that was initiated by his political enemies.

          The IG said “no” and Durham said “no.” The FBI had a legitimate non-political basis to open and thru Mueller continue the investigation. No Russia Hoax. Yes some poor atty altered an email to get a FISA warrant on Carter Page and renewal applications did not dispel Steele correctly but the investigation was not “lawfare,” was not a witch hunt, or a hoax but was warranted by the Trump Russia links.

         As to your “smoking gun” evidence that Hillary and the others committed “serious crimes,” ask yourself one question- why didn’t Durham make a criminal referral to the DOJ and US atty to investigate these treasonous crimes? I think you know the answer.

inicky46 61 Reviews 11 reads
posted
9 / 13
marikod 1 Reviews 14 reads
posted
10 / 13

Are you forgetting that your “Smoking Gun Declassified Durham Appendix” evidence was in -how can I put this delicately – IN THE DURHAM REPORT and that the 2016  and 2020 reports even preceded the Durham report? Just a guess here but I’m pretty sure that means Durham and the IG both knew of the “serious crimes,” the “treasonous conspiracy,” and that, as you say, the FBI  “made up the Trump Russia” connections. Despite this knowledge, as your own link says, Durham found no broad conspiracy, did not charge any of the Democrats committing treason, did not write that the FBI made it up,  did not mention this in testimony before Congress, and concluded the FBI did  have grounds for a preliminary investigation. Instead, he decided to prosecute - the poor schmuck who altered emails.

OK carry own!

inicky46 61 Reviews 12 reads
posted
11 / 13

Mari just PROVED the Durham report said there WAS Russian manipulation. But Wanker just goes....

inicky46 61 Reviews 9 reads
posted
12 / 13

What next, a full "Russia, Russia, Russia" explosion?

Register Now!