Politics and Religion

Harris Bombs Fox News Interview With Shrill, Combative Tone, Disqualifying Herself For Presidency
LostSon 43 Reviews 437 reads
posted

From the article

“As voters, we want to see a certain sense of calm and purpose in the leader of the Free World. Rage will make her closest advisers afraid of giving her the news she doesn't want to hear or raising ideas contrary to her expectations, though such discussions would be in America's interests. Such aggressive body language can result in staff turnover at the highest levels of the administration, leaving Americans underserved as crucial positions go unfulfilled. Axios has already reported that 92% of her  Vice President's office staff quit. The same infighting among her senior staff had caused Harris to abandon her 2020 presidential run. Tone matters for those seeking the highest office in the land. It certainly matters when Trump’s tone is one of the primary drivers of the Democrats’ distaste for him.
Harris was also blatantly dishonest about substance. Baier started with a simple question.  
Voters tell pollsters all over the country and here in Pennsylvania that immigration is one of the key issues they are looking at in this election. And specifically, the influx of illegal immigrants from more than 150 countries. How many would you estimate your administration has released into the country in the last 3 1/2 years?  
Harris never answered the question. The discussion went on for ten minutes (the most extended segment of the interview), but she never offered a number. It was utter disregard for the American voter and the Fourth Estate by the second-most senior official in the United States government, who was in charge of the border.  
We all know what happened. Under President Trump, illegal immigration levels were low because he strictly enforced policies through Executive Orders - such as "Remain In Mexico," stopping the "Catch and Release," and building sections of a border wall - against intense opposition from the Deep State and the courts.  
When the Biden-Harris administration appointed Alejandro Mayorkas as Secretary of Homeland Security, he said (on March 1, 2021): "We are dedicated to achieving—and quite frankly working around the clock—to replace the cruelty of the past administration with an orderly, humane, and safe immigration process." The result was that Biden-Harris canceled all 94 Executive Orders that Trump had issued.  
Today, we know what a disaster her policies have been. No one knows how many people crossed the border and were released into the country. [Estimates are 18 million plus].  
Her policies have certainly not been safe. Last month, the acting Director of Immigration Enforcement released an explosive letter, saying that under Biden-Harris, America had caught and released into the country over 662,000 migrants with criminal records. Worse, more than 15,000 of them were murderers convicted in their home countries, and 16,000 were convicted of sexual assault. Other crimes included 100,000 assaults, 70,000 drug violations, 90,000 invasions of privacy, and 16,000 weapons offenses.”

I have *not* watched this yet, but Harris is not good at interviewing. She beat Trump at the debate not by anything she said, but simply because she poked his ego and that is all he could concentrate on for the rest of the debate. He could have easily won like he did with Biden. Harris is trying to be likable, which is really what she has going for her. If Trump would make even a half ass attempt at not being a jerk he would do better. The majority of Americans don't care or know about policy (this is a glaring flaw, I know) but Trump's hate rhetoric is only going to get him so far.

Keep on chugging it, Looooooser....

Posted By: inicky46
Re: The Red Goo....
Keep on chugging it, Looooooser....
Anyone with eyes in their head saw her come apart at the seems. Like the article says she’s a bitch that is soooo bad she’s had over a 90% turnover in staff?  

Your TDS IS SOOOOOO bad you will take that BAT SHIT CRAZZZY over Trump?

All the things she claims Trump will do? They have already done them! Weaponize the DOJ just for example.
Look, here’s the bottom line.  

Trump upset the deep state feeding at the federal Trough. Bush started it with the war in Iraq. Obama kicked it into high gear and Hillary would have continued it.  

Trump comes along and stops the forever war and all hell breaks loose. So much so that the deep state has to steal the election. Biden is instilled and the feeding continues at a shocking pace. We get two major wars sooooo much spending that it kicks the economy into record inflation.  

Dumbasses like yourself line up to swill the real blue 🥶 goo from PMSNBC AND CNN and hell the big three ABC NBC CBS. Mean while the country goes to hell. AND YOU CHEER IT OVER THE CLIFF because why? Ohhh your “stock portfolio” goes up in value… 🙄🙄🙄 Not really cause your dollars are worth sooo much less.  

Anyway,

The only way Camel Toes and Tampon Tim win is another stolen election.  

🤷🏻‍♂️ sucks but it’s true.

Trump accuses Dems of doing EXACTLY what he's already done and intends to do more of. This is part of his MO. And YOU fell for it, you gullible dimwit. He learned it decades ago from Roy Cohn.
Oh, well, at least you're not alone....See below.
You guys should found a new group: The Gaslit Dimwits Assoc. of America.
History will judge you as fools.

The betting market consensus appears to be that the interview didn't help move Kamala forward.  Markets moved a couple points overnight.

They are even more irrelevant than the polls. And even the polls are wrong.

Partisans on both sides will spin the interview performance. But bettors are motivated by money.  Betting markets are a more neutral assessment of performance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymarket
"... In 2024, the outcome of U.S. elections became the most active market on the platform, with over $1.9 billion (as of October 15, 2024) wagered on the presidential race between the Republican candidate Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris. ... As of September 2024, Polymarket operates its election prediction operations offshore, as domestic operations would be regulated by the CFTC. ..."
.
"However, due to Polymarket *****lacking a cap on individual investor amounts,***** large wagers by one or a few bettors may ***not*** reflect a material change in the election landscape. ..."
.
"In October 2024, Polymarket initiated an investigation of potential *****market manipulation for an influence campaign in favor of the Donald Trump***** 2024 presidential campaign."
.
http://www.newsweek.com/who-polymarket-mystery-trader-fredi9999-1969646
What We Know About the Mystery Trader Betting Big on a Trump Win [Oct 16, 2024]
.
"A mysterious online trader is betting big on former President Donald Trump beating Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential race. ... Polymarket, one of the leading political betting markets that is based offshore and partially funded by *****Peter Thiel,***** [Shady Vance's benefactor and puppet master] gave Trump about a 60 percent chance off winning the election as of Wednesday, while Harris had a 40 percent chance of victory. ...
.
"But one trader has appeared to be influencing the market by betting millions of dollars on a Trump victory. As of late Tuesday, the trader, only known as Fredi9999, has purchased more than 15 million shares, valued at $8.7 million, betting that Trump would win the election.  
.
"Who this trader may be, as well as why they may be betting so much on the presidential race, remains unknown. Polymarket is a crypto-based prediction market largely out of the reach of U.S. regulators, and its users are anonymous. Fredi9999's profile provides few details about their identity, just that they joined the platform in June 2024.  ..."
.
"The Commodities and Futures Trading Commission has previously warned about the potential for ****manipulation in betting markets,**** which were illegal in the U.S. until recently. The trader could also be ****trying to influence the election**** by shifting the betting odds in Trump's favor, she said. ... The trader's large bets have shifted the market toward Trump, Rajiv Sethi, a professor of economics, wrote in a recent Substack post. On Oct. 7, the volume of contracts being traded on Polymarket caused a spike in Trump's chances of winning, based on no apparent news event. He suggested the trader is using a "very particular strategy" of "placing large limit buy orders slightly above the current best bid, effectively setting a floor on the price of the Trump contract." ... These two scenarios, he warned, would ****compromise the integrity of Polymarket's forecasting accuracy.**** ..."

Posted By: lester_prairie
Re: Who gives a fuck, Fester, what the "betting markets" say?
Partisans on both sides will spin the interview performance. But bettors are motivated by money.  Betting markets are a more neutral assessment of performance.
Except when they aren't.

The negative reaction to Kamala's Fox interview was across all betting markets, not just PolyMarket.

Also, Fester's take on the Fox interview is full of hackery. He's too big a hack to admit she won.

She took it to the trump audience and called out your fearless leader, to his own base… Gangsta move  
Mission accomplished..😂😂😂

Posted By: Hpygolky
Re: Now admit it Lost….. you’re panicking and you’re feelings are hurt..
She took it to the trump audience and called out your fearless leader, to his own base… Gangsta move  
 Mission accomplished..😂😂😂
Did you really just write “ Gangsta move” in reference to her melt down in front of the entire Nation?

Ohhhhhh NOT HAPPY… seriously? It was a level of cringe that made me embarrassed for her. THAT’S HOW BAD IT WAS! Her outright not answering or but Trumping every question was shocking!

You wanna be limousine liberals better wake up. If she’s elected she’s coming for YOUR supposed wealth because the billionaires sure as fuck aren’t going to let her have theirs.

would be "complete meltdown" to describe Kamala's interview.  My favorite part was when Baier was wrapping up and told Kamala, "I hope you got to say everything you wanted to say about Trump," effectively mocking her pivot on every single question to a deflection on Trump.

I can't believe Kamala snubbed the Al Smith dinner. It's totally scripted, all she had to do was read the monologue the joke writers wrote for her. I mean she had the entire late night television joke writers staff at her disposal.  What a wasted opportunity. It's a mystery.

and also ducked the traditional "60 Minutes" interview that both candidates have been doing since 1968. And I guarantee that not a single swing state voter knows what the Al Smith Dinner is, nor do they care.

Why take the risk when he's going up in the polls without them?  Harris is the one who is desperate and needs to take risks.  Kudos to her that she is doing it even though she's bombing.  

Jim Gaffigan was funny, he zinged everyone in the crowd.

If you weren't such a stupid righty, you would have provided a link, you fucking moron.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9ZGfyXruqs

Gaffigan joked about Trump grabbing pussy right in front of Melania

It’s a little early but how about we whip out the…

He's on a new comedy show on CNN with Roy Wood Jr. and Amber Ruffin:

durran42146 reads

I just rewatched the interview again. It's even WORSE the 2nd time...

Posted By: durran421
Re: Like a bad movie...
I just rewatched the interview again. It's even WORSE the 2nd time...
You’re a better man than I Gunga din I could not do a second go round with her fingernails on Chad board voice.  

And you lefty idiots want 4 more years of that???

W H Y ?  

Is it just your TDS? If it is say so but quit the “Camel Toes is beyond great!!!”

Register Now!