Politics and Religion

Ha! Typical response.
TheAnswer 51 Reviews 4506 reads
posted

That might, in a nutshell, sum up what annoys me about Liberals: Blame all your economic problems on the government and look for them to bail you out.

I challenge you righties to answer what is in this footage on this video. But ya'll will probably do what you always do and dodge what is shown attacking the messenger (or changing the subject).

This video speaks for itself:
http://www.metroblogging.com/videothevote/index_str.html

Crick5445 reads

Who's fault is it the GOP/losers lost in the WA state gubernatorial election?

Uranus?

I thought you guys were suppose to be MANLY MEN....I knew you Repugs would avoid the challenge and just ignor what is in that video clip...

Still waiting for someone to accept the Challenge...How do you explain what is was caught on camera? I'm still waiting to hear your explaination......

.....Still waiting......



Snowman395940 reads

we do the same thing as the Democratic party does...

ONLY WE ARE BETTER AT IT

Now, please point out any illegal activity in this video and we can talk, otherwise it's just more Farenheit 911 garbage.

So you are admitting that blacks were disenfranchised in Ohio?

And please site your evidence (maybe you can show me something caught on video) where the Dems have been doing this recently?

I'll admit, the Dems piss me off too, but for different reasons -- they won't stand and fight with the same dirty tactics that are used against them by the Repugs. I say it is high time they sprout some balls and start fighting back against this dirty, dishonest bullsh*t.

I knew you would attack the messenger. When you rightees can't win an arguement (like most of the time) you either attack the messenger and/or change the subject.

I have found that you guys have a very difficut time just sticking to the point. I call it intentional ADD (used as a way to divert and avoid) which you all learned real good from the Rush/Hannity/O'Rielly/FAUX crowd -- they taught ya'll well. Congratulations.

Snowman395430 reads

I see a lot of cops, a lot of people bitching, and no arrests. The problem you have is you are so busy spouting hate speech, (you rightees, blah, blah, blah) you never bother to really argue your side. You grab some clip off of the web and say see, see, but when asked what it proves you just fall into a rant.

Since this is the same style I saw throught the election, I understand why Bush is POTUS for another 4 years...

Pretty weak for someone who use stamina in their handle ;-)

Now, you were not attacked nor the video, you were simply asked to provide what the source YOU CITED proves.

Well, were waiting....

I was talking about you attacking Michael Moore. What's more, if your last message was not an attack, what the hell was it?

What does it prove? It does not "prove" anything! It SHOWS people being disenfranchised from voting which you seem to have no problem with. What's more it shows that what looks to be an organized effort by Republicans to do so. Do I really have to explain this to you?

BTW, you say F911 is garbage? That's funny. You probably didn't even see it and have NO idea what you are talking about -- am I right? If it is gargage answer this: Why has 90% of what's in that film not even been disputed by you rightees?

Saying "rightee" is hate speech? Oh, okay Mr. Sensitive Manly Man. So then you would also say that about every other word out of Rush/Hannity/O'Rielly/Faux News is also "hate speach", right?

What color is the sky in your world?



-- Modified on 1/1/2005 6:46:38 PM

Snowman396690 reads

"It does not "prove" anything!"... stamina4hours

So my question is, why did you waste our time with it and why should we respond to something that proves nothing??

For all I know, it shows people too stupid to know how to register? Did you do any really follow-up and find out who these people were and what happened, NO!!!

In regards to Farenheit 911, I do not PAY to listen to people's opinions. I make my assumption based on the source, as so many people do on this board the minute you mention Rush Limbaugh or FOX News, so allow me to make the same judgements as so many on the left do. So based on your earlier post regarding these sources you would condemn me for doing exactly what you have done.






-- Modified on 1/2/2005 11:48:02 PM

That was a nice dodge...again.

Are you saying that everything anyone writes must "prove" something in order to be acceptable to you on this blog? I was asking for comments on what that video shows. Yet, you got very defensive instead.

Rush and Faux do not deal in the reality based community like many rightees. My point is that even you rightees have not even challenged over 90% of the facts in F911 yet you still trash it as if it is not true. Well if so, tell us which parts are not true? The no wmds? The failed policy? All the things Bush and his people said? Which things are not true? And don't use the easy cop-out of "its all a lie" because you know that is not true. The footage speaks for itself. And if you had seen it you would know that.

RLTW4558 reads

You were not asking for comments. You made a direct challenge to the evil neo-cons to disprove video footage that you presented as flat-out undeniable fact. Go read your post again if you disagree.


RLTW

Snowman395906 reads

RLTW nailed it. You presented this as fact and wanted conservaties to prove it wasn't true. If you are going to put something on the board, you need to be able to show it as fact (which you can not).

It is not the place of the people on this board to disprove a negative, but for you to prove the stuff you post on here is true, otherwise your reputation is CRAP.

Well, we're STILL waiting...

If that is the case, you guys are really nuts. Which thing did I right that gave you the impression I was presenting something as fact?

The video footage speaks for itself.

You guys keep kicking up a whole lot of nothin in order to continiue to avoid what is on the video. It's the same old thing -- change the subject and/or attack the messenger.

Snowman3912203 reads

If so, I do not share your racist views...

You said the video speaks for itself, but it seems to concentrate on minorites who were not able to vote. Since you have failed time and time again to address what this means, I decided to really watch the video and was shocked when I realized you were making fun of all these poor folks.

You should really be ashamed...

Now, if you want to call that a cop-out, I guess I can't stop you so go ahead.  If you see this in a Realplayer version, let me know and I'd love to see it.

And an honorable mention for not pretending to see it and comment as if you did.

If you can afford a computer with enough space to install QuickTime, maybe you should NOT be supporting Republicans -- they certainly are not supporting you...

will never understand.  I don't want "support" from anyone in Gov., I just want them out of my business & pocketbook.

Trust me, there a bigger & better machines in my biz where they need to be, this old dog does fine for now.  If I can't run the latest & greatest programs for vids, I won't lose a second of sleep.

They are supporting the richest few in the nation.

BTW, I am near the top % got a sizable tax cut from Bush  -- Funny how I did a lot better overall under Clinton...

That might, in a nutshell, sum up what annoys me about Liberals: Blame all your economic problems on the government and look for them to bail you out.

The fact remains that Bush & the repugs have given huge tax cuts to the rich and shifted the tax burden to the lower and middle class. In the process taking the largest surplus in history and turning it into the largest deficit in history -- now each new child born will already owe $100,000 the moment they see the light of day to the fed gov -- this is how Bush gives his rich friends a huge tax cut -- by assessing a "baby tax' on the next generation of children being borne. Now these are the facts, bro -- and I know you rightees get "annoyed" with facts.

I don't "balame" the Gov. I blame Bush & The repugs for their incredible irrisponsibility. And, btw, this is a conservative position -- not a liberal one. You should be agreeing with me.

I've now read this entire post.  As I usually do, I think both sides are over-reacting.

Firstly, Stamina, pointing to one video as evidence of widespread material election fraud is weak, even dangerous.  We have no idea who these people are or their stories?  And, even if it IS 100% true, its one precinct in one state and one side of the story.  I'd love to really compare the voter fraud problems in a bipartisan manner but I've still seen nothing that didn't smell of a partisan agenda.  If you really think you're right, why not do a scientific, unbiased analysis that incorporates both sides?

From that perspective, why the smarmy "we're better than you" nonsense from the republicans?  This from the party that gave us Bob Dole and Dan Quayle?  I know you have a country to run, but if you're really better at this, then why not have your own objective and scientific analysis of the facts.

All we do here on this board is argue our preconceived notions supported with questionable "they'll publish anything on the web" data.  Man, I'm getting frustrated.

LOL, what a rant!  I need drink.

Register Now!