Write Review
2,074,469 Total Reviews 3,847 New Reviews
10,285 Users Online

Politics and Religion

Justice Dept dropping Flynn’s criminal case
DaveMogal 74 Reviews 795 reads
posted

Looks like the chickens are coming home to roost on the fraud on framing Micheal Flynn.

Related Link: https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/ap-exclusive-justice-dept-dropping-fly...

DaveMogal37 reads

after bombshell documents reveal he hid brady (items that would have exonerated Micheal Flynn)  material.

This is just the beginning folks. Many more things to come, stay tuned.

Related Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/breaking-mueller-thug-attorney-brandon-van-gra...

ReplyQuoteReport
cks17523 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Hpygolky37 reads

It'll be up to the Judge to drop the case, or not. And didn't he once reprimanded Flynn for "Selling out his country"...I'd pump the breaks on this.
In my opinion, he's still a low life traitor.

ReplyQuoteReport
DaveMogal52 reads

There will be indictments coming.  They changed FBI 302 forms that were submitted to FISA court. That is a felony.

Related Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/drops-doj-case-against-michael-flynn-in-wake-of-intern...

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan28 reads

...He's also been very tough on Flynn.  He once hinted that he might sentence Flynn to more jail time than the prosecutors requested.  And when Flynn wanted to withdraw his guilty plea, Judge Sullivan made it very difficult for Flynn to do.

Judge Sullivan is 72 years old so I doubt that he's afraid of very much at this point in his life.  And he's not a liberal - Ronald Reagan appointed him to the superior court in D.C.  Poppy Bush put him on the D.C Court of Appeals and Bill Clinton elevated him to the federal bench.

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion25 reads

be impeached by Congress, which could  be Republican-controlled next term.  Then he's out of a job.

ReplyQuoteReport
impposter40 reads

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
Re: Wrong.  A judge can . . .  
be impeached by Congress, which could  be Republican-controlled next term.  Then he's out of a job.
What will be the grounds for impeachment?

ReplyQuoteReport
gentleguy102045 reads

treating a monkey like a monk!!  A monkey  will do and say the same shit over and over and over ..... that’s why the phrase money brain!! 😂

ReplyQuoteReport
coeur-de-lion23 reads

We should ask Adam Schiff.  He's great at making up grounds for impeachment out of thin air.  He did it once already, why not again?  If Schiff doesn't want to get creative again, then I'm sure the GOP can think of something.  Its more likely that if this judge was going to be impeached and have all  of his bias from the bench exposed, he would just retire rather than have his name dragged through the mud, sort of like Trump's sister did when they went after her for being Trump's sister, despite her stellar record as a jurist.  

ReplyQuoteReport
lester_prairie26 reads

What's the judge going to do, prosecute him himself?  

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky4639 reads

Now try to follow along: Flynn already pled GUILTY. The Justice Dept dropping the case doesn't change that. So while the judge COULD drop it, he doesn't have to. All he needs to do is sentence Flynn and then LOCK HIM UP.
PS: If you read the filing, Justice didn't say Flynn didn't lie to the FBI. So he's still guilty.
Lucky for Fester, you are only guilty of stupidity.

ReplyQuoteReport
marikod56 reads

the prosecution. Moreover, the judge can deny leave if dismissal is “clearly contrary to manifest public interest.”  The DOJ is arguing, however, that the public interest exception only applies where the DOJ wants to impose stricter charges, or otherwise harass the defendant- not give him a Get Out of Jail Free card.

 But it is a little ridiculous for the DOJ to contend –as it did in the motion - that it could not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt when Flynn has pled guilty. Duh. The hearing on this motion is going to be fascinating.

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGambler29 reads

If ALL the evidence against General Flynn, besides his coerced confession of course is "fruit of the poisoned tree" and thus inadmissible, then it's VERY likely that the DOJ would be unable to prove a case against General Flynn using evidence obtained legally.

 
I find it ironic that all the race baiters who constantly harp about all the black men in prison who were put there unjustly because they were forced to plead guilty to crimes they never committed are now claiming that a confession, coerced or otherwise is now PROOF POSITIVE that a person is guilty. Or are you going to argue that threatening to go after a man's son after stripping him of all the resources needed to defend him is NOT coercion?  

 
I certainly know who NOT to hire if I am ever in a battle for my life that's for sure. I think I'll still with the other fake lawyer on TER, the honorable Mr Fishbro esquire. lol

ReplyQuoteReport
marikod30 reads

After Flynn lied about his contacts with the Russians, and after he lied about his lobbying in Turkey, and after he lied to the Vice President, and after he lied when he signed the plea agreement and initialed “no other  promises were made,” and after he lied when he pled guilty, and after Flynn lied when he said in court “I recognize that the actions acknowledged in court today were “wrong,” and after he lied when he reaffirmed his guilty plea a second time, GaGambler has figured out that Flynn IS TELLING THE TRUTH WHEN HE SAYS “I WAS COERCED” TO PLEAD GUILTY.

I am truly impressed. He didn't mention that in the first motion to withdraw the plea, either.  But I don’t buy  your “fruit of the poisonous tree” theory-the government has nothing left to prove because of the guilty plea and that theory has nothing to do with why a withdrawn guilty plea is inadmissible. See Rule 410. I might buy that the “poisonous fruit” landed on your head though.

Rumor has it that Mr. Fisher has been disbarred, or is drinking at the same bar as are you. Either way, I suggest you rethink this one.

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan38 reads

THE COURT:  Mr Flynn, how do you plead?
THE DEFENDANT:  Guilty, Your Honor.
THE COURT:  Are you entering this plea of guilty because you are guilty and for no other reason?
THE DEFENDANT:  Yes, Your Honor.

Do you see, you fucking moron, that the judge deliberately asked Flynn if he was pleading guilty because he was in fact guilty and not because the FBI entrapped him?  Flynn freely pleaded guilty UNDER OATH.  The judge can sentence him regardless of what Buffoon Bill Barr does.

ReplyQuoteReport
cks17558 reads

Same judge dismissed all seven counts that Senator Stephens had been convicted on after Holder’s DOJ moved to drop case after uncovering judicial misconduct.  Very interested in seeing how he handles this ruling.

Related Link: Judge Drops The Hammer on DOJ in Stephens Case - LA Times

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan45 reads

...If there is a new administration next year with a REAL Justice Dept. that actually cares about the rule of law instead of protecting Trump's buddies, then the charges could very well be brought against Flynn once again.

 
Judge Sullivan once said to Flynn in open court:  "I am going to be frank with you, this crime is very serious.  I can’t hide my disgust, my disdain, at this criminal offense."  Sullivan really believed Flynn was guilty.  He said that never in his decades on the bench had he accepted a guilty plea from a defendant who was not really guilty and he wasn't going to start with Flynn.

 
Judge Sullivan is going to do everything within his power not to let that worm Flynn wriggle off the hook of his guilty plea.

 
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/18/trump-michael-flynn-judge-emmet-sullivan-sentencing

-- Modified on 5/8/2020 7:07:02 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
cks17539 reads

If there’s a chance he could be tried again, Trump would pardon him, wouldn’t he?

ReplyQuoteReport
gentleguy102032 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!