Buckle up ABC viewers and Camel toes lovers! This could get REAL real soon!  

Love how the news media is largely ignoring it! 🤔😲😲

Why wouldn't the complaint go to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) rather than the SEC (Securities Exchange Commission).  I don't see how giving Kamala the questions in advance violates federal securities laws, of which I'm quite familiar.  

and she's so dumb (as dumb as Looooser) she probably meant to write FEC not SEC. The former being the Federal Elections Commission. If there's anything to the story (and there probably is not) it would at least make sense to involve the FEC. As you say, the SEC makes zero sense.

Screen shots of the complaint are to the SEC.
.
That said, the whistleblower might not know who to report it to.  If they find out the name of the whistleblower he or she will be socially destroyed, fired, and blacklisted.  That's what happened to the chick they suspected of releasing the damning video of the suppression of the Epstein story.   They called her new employer and had her fired -- based on flimsy evidence that she was involved at all.  It was better to nuke her to send a message to others, even if she had nothing to do with it.  That's how liberals operate to keep a lid on dissent.

ABC and its parent corporation Disney are publicly traded companies and with ABC cheating so blatantly on a presidential debate and being a news agency with the protections afforded a free press have essentially engaged in something akin to insider trading by rigging the debate. The fact the whistle blower sent a copy through the mail the day before proving that the fix was in, is huge. Like this could cause ABC to be shut down.

Are you ready for it? -- But FOX!
.
FOX is a publicly traded company and with FOX cheating so blatantly on a presidential ELECTION OUTCOME and being a news agency with the protections afforded a free press have essentially engaged in something akin to insider trading by KNOWINGLY LYING ABOUT THE ELECTION RESULTS. The fact INTERNAL FOX DOCUMENTS (obtained under court ordered subpoenae) proving that the BIG LIE was A LIE, is huge. BUT THIS DID NOT CAUSE FOX to be shut down.  
.
It will be interesting to get to the bottom of what actually happened. E.g., ...
1. ABC sent the same preliminary info regarding topics to be discussed to BOTH campaigns? But the whistleblower only blew the whistle about Harris and ignored the equal treatment?
2. A rogue ABC insider sent info to one or both campaigns without the knowledge or permission of ABC managers? But the whistleblower learned of the rogue action and only blew the whistle on Harris?
3. ...  
4. THERE WAS NO UNFAIRLY LEAKED INFO.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/06/trump-fbi-foreign-election-interference-gore-downey/591748/
Tom Downey was advising the Gore team in 2000 when he received documents stolen from George W. Bush. His first reaction was to turn them over to the FBI. [dateline June 2019]  
.
"In his interview with George Stephanopoulos on Wednesday [2019], President Donald Trump tried to imagine a scenario in which someone involved with a presidential campaign would call the FBI if that person was offered dirt from a foreign government on the opposition. “Okay, let’s put yourself in a position,” the president begins. “You’re a congressman. Somebody comes up and says, ‘Hey, I have information on your opponent.’ Do you call the FBI? … You don’t call the FBI. “Life doesn’t work that way,” Trump added.
.
"In 2000, life did work that way for Tom Downey, a former Democratic representative from New York who was helping his friend, Vice President Al Gore, run for the White House. Downey, who had served in the House for 18 years until becoming a lobbyist in 1993, had been preparing to play Gore’s opponent, George W. Bush, in the presidential debates when, in mid-September, he received a package in the mail. It contained briefing materials and a videotape. When Downey started watching the tape, along with his assistant, he quickly realized it was a video of Bush practicing as if he were being interviewed by Tim Russert, the late Meet the Press host who was a contender to moderate the first debate. ..."
.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=122921
Gore Confidant Turns Over Debate Plans.
The FBI is assessing a videotape and documents sent to a confidant of Al Gore that relate to George W. Bush’s debate preparations.
.
"Tom Downey, a former New York congressman who had been helping the vice president prepare for debates, received the mysterious package at his Washington office Tuesday morning. After viewing the enclosed VHS tape for less than a minute and looking through the half-inch thick stack of written documents, he contacted his lawyer Marc Miller, the attorney said. Miller than contacted the FBI which took possession of the package and its contents Wednesday afternoon.  
.
" “When Mr. Downey determined what it was or what he thought it was,” Miller told ABCNEWS, “we decided we didn’t want to have anything to do with it.” A Democratic lawyer knowledgeable about the contents of the package told ABCNEWS that the videotape and papers are “the real deal” and appear to be actual material from the Bush campaign’s debate preparations. “Clearly, this is something that should not have been sent to me,” Downey said in a statement. Downey told associates that the tape showed a mock-debate session between the Texas governor and New Hampshire Sen. Judd Gregg, the Bush camp’s stand-in for Gore, the Associated Press reported.
.
"The package, according to Downey’s attorney, was shipped via 2-Day Express Mail and has a postmark of Austin, Texas, where the Bush campaign’s headquarters is located. Miller added that the package had a return address as well as a typed, but unsigned note addressed to Downey. The bizarre incident occurred on the eve of a meeting between Bush and Gore campaign officials and the Commission on Presidential Debates to resolve a longstanding dispute over the date, venue and format for televised debates this fall. ..."
.
http://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/us/politics/trump-russia-email-clinton.html
Russian Dirt on Clinton? ‘I Love It,’ Donald Trump Jr. Said.
.
http://www.npr.org/2018/08/06/635860399/trump-admits-his-son-met-with-russian-lawyer-to-get-dirt-on-clinton
Trump (Again) Admits His Son Met With Russian Lawyer To Get Dirt On Clinton.
.
"It was a tweet that set off a storm. Was President Trump admitting to collusion between his campaign and Russia? Was he stipulating that the now notorious June 2016 Trump Tower meeting arranged by his son Donald Trump Jr. really was all about getting dirt on Hillary Clinton from a Kremlin-linked Russian lawyer and not adoption issues as President Trump had earlier claimed?  "This was a meeting to get information on an opponent, totally legal and done all the time in politics - and it went nowhere," the president tweeted early Sunday. ..."
.
It WAS illegal but the DoJ determined that Don Jr. was too stupid to know it was illegal and did not press charges against him.

everything you post, but you are off on this point.  The SEC is the place to complain ONLY about issues that may influence or manipulate the stock price.  How ABC operates its broadcast business has no relation to trading of the company's shares unless they are putting out false information in an attempt to manipulate share prices.  For example, if they broadcast a story that said ABC just merged with CBS and NBC that was false, and the price of the shares shot up before the falsity of the story was discovered, that would be an issue for the SEC, criminally, civilly, or both depending on the specifics.  

 
Broadcast operations are covered by the FCC (and possibly the FEC as noted by Nicky, but I haven't looked into that, so I can't say one way or the other).  Running a crooked debate is NOT under the purview of the SEC.  

ROFLMAO!!!!  Good to know you consider yourself as stupid as LostSon!

The only poster as stupid as Loooooser is The SPOAT.

For confirming I know what I'm talking about by your total avoidance of the topic.  You have nothing substantive to add, so you fling a little poo. It's exactly what I would expect from the monkey cage,  Lol

"You have nothing substantive to add, so you fling a little poo." such as an allegation of a whistleblower filing to an unknown or, perhaps, one of three (or more) possible agencies. Please wash your hands and post again with a LINK to a press release from the agency regarding the claims.

in the way of rebuttal to my post to add either, you could just say, "Me, too" and save the rest for another time.   All I said was the SEC has no jurisdiction over the content of a publicly-traded broadcast business unless said broadcast was an attempt to manipulate the stock price, so it's the WRONG place to file the subject complaint about the corrupt debate.  Prove me wrong if you think you can.  When I was a fresh-faced yute with a newly minded MBA, I worked in compliance on wall street.  

She’s posting screen shots from the SEC.

As CDL correctly pointed out, the SEC is the wrong place to file such a complaint so this will go nowhere. If the guy was really serious he'd have figured this out and filed with the FEC.
It must be comforting to know you are as dumb as Loomer, Loooooser.
Semper Lie.

END OF MESSAGE

I’m betting a consultation with a lawyer occurred before the complaint was sent in and maybe a complaint has been forwarded to the FEC? B U T… The SEC has actual legal Teeth to do something about this.  

Now, ALL ya ‘all pathetic lefty hacks (and you are) don’t want to admit that ABC colluded with the Harris campaign to C H E A T on a presidential debate.  

Orrrrrrr

You’re just fine with the cheating because you H A T E 🤬  Trump sooooo much.  

Soooo 🤔 which is it?

zero allegations of any conduct by anyone that violates any specific regulation or law charged with enforcement by the SEC.  I still say this is the wrong agency for this complaint.  

 
For example, a valid complaint would need to allege specific violations of the United States Code, or applicable CFR's over which the SEC has control as a matter of law.  This complaint does not.  It's just a never-ending narrative by the writer.  Each regulatory body has oversight of only the subject matter under their jurisdiction as given to them by various laws and codes.  Otherwise, they may sit on it for a year and then refer you to another agency.  If you want a complaint to be taken seriously, you need to cite the specific laws you or regulations you believe have been violated, so they know which legal department within the agency to send it to for investigation.  If you don't, it's not going to go anywhere.  I think if this guy really thought he had something sexy, he would have talked to a lawyer first and make sure he is going to the right place with his complaint.  Maybe he did, and the lawyer just laughed.  

Soooo with out the specific laws being possibly broken, the SEC Won’t investigate?

the scope of their legal oversight responsibilities, they have no interest in spending their resources on such an investigation.   They don't care if laws were broken that come under the purview of OTHER agencies.  It's not their responsibility to go outside the four corners of what SECURITIES LAW requires them to do.  

 
Like I said earlier, the only issue that has legs with the SEC is whether or not something was broadcast that affected or attempted to affect securities prices, thereby manipulating the market.  I don't even see any allegations in the complaint to that effect, so it's a non-starter.

The correct answer is there was no collusion and Looooser's issue is simply that he HATES it that Harris led Trump around by the nose.
Because Looooser HATES the truth so much.

He's so desperate to believe what he's been fed that even when a fellow righty tries to explain simple facts to him he can't accept it.
Loooooser is profoundly lost.
And stupid.
Oh, well. At least The SPOAT is back to Looooser is only the second-stupidest poster here.