It's never happened before but Politico got ahold of a draft opinion. Reading the tea leaves, since the opinion was written. by Alito, that means it was 5-4 with Roberts voting against.
So....
1) No one has ever leaked a document like this.
2) It's emblematic of how politicized the Court has become.
3) Many states are now poised to ban abortion with draconian laws that would forbid women even to travel to another state.
4) A right established 50 years ago has simply been erased. Precedent no longer means anything.
5) What will the effect be on upcoming elections? One thing's for sure, many women will never vote for another Republican.
6) There will be calls to expand the number of justices.

that are not specifically vested to individuals to the states, where the representatives elected by the people will decide the issue for that state.   This ruling, if it's real, just returns the issue of abortion to the states where it has always belonged under the US Constitution.  Prostitution is legal in some countries, so sex vacations are popular with many guys in those countries.  Similarly, there will now be abortion vacations for those who live in a jurisdiction that doesn't allow it.  You won't even have to leave the continental US.  California and New York will be waiting for the influx of abortion tourism.  You can take you kid to Disneyland just before he's born and then kill him the next day.

It is much more than that SCOTUS has returned the issue to the states, which would be bad enough. It's that many states (like Texas) are also criminalizing going to ANOTHER state for an abortion. And making it illegal to use the mail to send abortion pills to people.
How about that?

complicated to confuse their not-too-bright voters.  It's really simple.  MOVE to where it's legal for six months and then move back when it's over.  How can "you changed your mind about living in New York" be criminalized?  Perhaps the real answer is to take some responsibility in the first place and use birth control?  Why let people off the hook who throw caution to the wind and are irresponsible to the point of involving an innocent third life in their fucking?

Conservatives believe is was a liberal Hail Mary attempt to get the Court to change their opinion by riling up public sentiments.

Why should someone have to move out of state for six months to get an abortion? If you don't see how ludicrous that is then you clearly fall into your own "not-too-bright" category.
Then, like a typical Republican, you blame the victim.

if they don't like paying State income tax, they should leave NY or California, and many people have.  In this case, if they want an abortion, they will have to prioritize what is important to them.  There is no state income tax in Texas.  Do they want to kill their baby, and pay income tax for the privilege, or do they want to have the child and live free of state income tax?  Life is about freedom of choice, and they still have choices.  

Does this mean you're really pro-choice? Or only when you're not a woman? Most of the women whose choices are about to be deleted are too poor to travel, which makes your brilliant solution meaningless. And many of them are people of color. So, while you righties whine about Dems letting illegal brown people into the country so they  can vote, you're in favor of the legal ones being forced to birth kids who'll vote Democrat.
Yep, that makes a whole lot of sense.

How about enlightening us on how states will: a) know someone is pregnant b) leaves the state and c) get an abortion? Checkpoints at the airport? Requiring doctors to give up patient info? Roadblocks at state borders?  

Clerks are not assigned to justices, they are interviewed and hired, so this is a huge reflection on Sotomayor's judgment, and likely to give other justices, even the libs, pause in what kind of info they trust her with in the future.

From inflation, the border, the economy, and everything else they are fucking up  

From the Times:
"Senator Susan Collins of Maine, one of the few Republican supporters of abortion rights in Congress, expressed anger at Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh, saying their reported support for the draft ruling “would be completely inconsistent” with what they had told her about their views of Roe as settled law."

CDL's solution for when abortion is outlawed in one state is the perfect example of a statement made by an elitist Republican who has no concept of what it's like to be poor.  It's the most insensitive comment since Marie Antoinette allegedly said, when told the people had no bread: "Let them eat cake."

The only question here is what will the ruling's impact will be in Nov.

When my post is full of irrefutable facts, it's pretty hard to call it poetic license, and that's why everyone has their panties in a bunch.  

BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

The issues that will be important at the polls are inflation, crime, economy, and gas prices.  If Biden and the Dumb Dems can't fix these by November, abortion is not an issue that anyone will care about.  Thinking this issue will drive voters to the polls in November to vote for Democrats is just wishful thinking.

that Kamala Harris has when she knows she is being made a fool of?

not one sentence about why this wouldn't work.  The Biden administration can organize and bus illegals all over the country.  Why can't they bus women to other states to get abortions?  They can give homeless people vouchers to stay in modest hotels for several nights.  Why couldn't they do that for women from other states getting abortion.  H&HS should be able to manage something simple like this.  They could call the bus the "Baby-killing Express" and put decals of little arms and legs on the sides of the bus.