Politics and Religion

Fair comment - but to continue the analogy, Rethugs
Chuck Darwin 2833 reads
posted

spend 97.2% of their time ranting about it, and 1.6% of their time moving the dirt from one room to the next!

Think I'll go outdoors and let the estrogen-disabled argue about cleaning the house.

avenger10017887 reads

You're favorites are all here in this article.

Mark Foley
Ted Haggard
Larry Craig
Bob Allen
Glenn Murphy Jr.

I think I hear them calling you into their public bathroom stall.

And have you noticed the right-wingers on this forum who support these re-pubic-ans are not married with children?  No wonder their numbers are declining.

http://www.badmouth.net/top-five-republican-gay-sex-scandals/

GaGambler2832 reads

not about the sex scandals of politicians, gay, republican or otherwise. I'm not a homophobe, and I really don't care.

What I am curious about Mr(or Mrs) Avenger is just what is it that you think you are avenging. Or did you just think it was a cool comic book name. Don't worry, you can tell us. We won't think less of you we were all 16 once, or are you actually fourteen?

Chuck Darwin3047 reads

until a Democrat is involved.   Then it's all about the law and Clinton's fault.

GaGambler2279 reads

I could give a fuck who is fucking who, male or female, find a single post I have made criticizing anyone for sexual behavior besides that piece of shit Spitzer. A man that puts people in jail for comitting the same noncrime as he does himself deserves our contempt.

I have rarely said a bad thing about "Bill" Clinton and have gone on the record many times saying I would prefer him over any of the candidates not only still running, but any that have run in 2008.

Get your facts straight JackO, you've been hanging around with the likes of Zinaval and the caped crusader or Avenger or whatever the fuck that little juvenile bastard likes to call himself.

Chuck Darwin2332 reads

If I'm a liberal and the subject of all the voices in your head, then you're a Republican and put on earth for my entertainment.

GaGambler2236 reads

No comeback, just more noise.

Why don't just admit you're wrong, and move on. If you want to call RWU or GOPGeezer Republicons that's fine, they actually are Republicans and apparently proud of the fact.

I like several others here, am not a Republican, I don't worship Jesus, I support a woman's right to choose, I don't condemn Bill Clinton, and I think the Patriot act is a scary piece of legislation.

So if you insist on calling me names, get your facts straight, just like with ethnic slurs. I don't mind if you call me a chink, just please don't call me a gook or a dink. Keep your facts straight is all I ask.

GaGambler3745 reads

If the Republicons are so stupid, then why do YOU bother? Why don't you leave them to Moose and Co?

BizarreBipolarBoy3085 reads

If the Republicans were as uniformly stupid as the Harries, they'd be harmless as long as you kept out of puking range.   Then all they'd get would be some  irregular mockery.

But they aren't uniformly stupid or harmless.  In fact, few of any group are uniform.  Some Republicans have a few serious bones in their bodies.

In fact, the reason I usually manifest as a Democrat is primarily to even out the bullshit somewhat.   It's not that I LIKE underdogs, it's more that I can't resist an unfair fight.

RightwingUnderground2335 reads

Or are you just living in the past? You DID notice that your link was almost a year old. Or maybe you missed the year and thought is was from the future.

As I said before, your hatred isn't healthy. Do you hate all Republicans or just the gay ones?

BTW, how do you presume to know the family status of people here? Are you following us home. You probably should know that that's not healthy either.

avenger10012338 reads

Hey, RightWingUnderground, it's not current news.  It's a top 5 list review.  Like an article on the top stories of 2007, you'll see the events can take up to a year from the article.  The article came out in 2007, and covers the top 5 stories within one year from the article's date.

Lame posting by someone trying to sound intelligent.

Just like how you right-wingers are constantly trying to control everyone's sex lives and who someone can love, it's only fair to examine your sex life.

I don't think right-wingers like RWU, GaGambler, Billkile, zisk, etc... are married.  You guys spend way too much time on this anonymous internet forum, multiple times every day, ranting and whining about how you hate everyone not like you.

If you were married, this must be the typical scenario of your marriage.

Roles: RWA (Right Wing Addict), wifey (your supposed wife)

wifey: Hi honey, I noticed you are consistently reading and posting on this internet forum from theeroticreview.com .  You spend most of the day, pretty much every day, on this website.  What's so great about it that you never spend time with me or have sex with me?

RWA: This is the greatest website.  It's all about rating and reviewing your favorite hooker and escape from your ugly wife and hopeless family and life.  The best part of it is that I can meet a bunch of bitter, depressed men like me also seeking sex from prostitutes.

wifey: Oh, I see.  So when you secretly go somewhere in the evening, now I know.  It's to see your favorite hooker you found from the website so you can get away from me.

RWA: Yeah, but we're still married, so I made a vow to you.

wifey: I also figured out why well over $1000 consistently disappears every month from our bank account, in the form of cash withdrawls usually amounting $500 at a time.

RWA: But I still love you and believe in republican family values and fiscal responsibility.

wifey: Yes, I see the fiscal responsibility part.  You're taking thousands of precious dollars every month that can fund lifelong plans like retirements or paying off mortgages or debt for financial security.  Instead, you want to spend our future on a physically exhilirating but emotionally empty one-night stand on a hooker you will never see again.

RWA: Yep, it's all about us and the family.  It's the republican way.

FunluvnCowboy2713 reads

you know damn well he's going back.

Now the Democrats have a much better idea, and that is, socialize it into a big old orgy every TuThSat nights.

But then we get tired of the Same Old Shit, and we need travelers.  Hell, I'll chip in for bus fare!

GaGambler2951 reads

I couldn't have said it better myself. The same could be said for every post you have made to date.

Your daddy sure is going to be pissed when he finds that you've hijacked his TER account.

Awesome, dude. You rock!

Or whatever juveniles say to each other to indicate approval.

Mark Foley resigned, and if he had not, he would have been defeated in his re-election bid.

Senator Craig was asked by the Republican leadership to resign and has refused. He has already announced that he is not running again, but if he did run again, he would absolutely face a primary challenge and would lose.

Meanwhile, Democrats repeatedly re-elected Ted Kennedy, they have re-elected Congressman Jefferson of Louisiana, who likes to keep his ill gotten gains nice and cold in his freezer, and lets not forget the crowning achievement, Barney Frank, who's roommate was running an escort service that involved underaged boys out of Frank's apartment.

Republicans have a tendency to clean house when one of their own embarrasses them. Democrats seem more inclined to pin a medal to the guys chest and give him a ticker tape parade.

Lest we forget:

Recently deceased Democrat Gerry Democrat Studds-Democrat-MA (he and Barney Frank teamed up quite a bit---on legislation I mean) got a 17 yr old male page drunk and had sex with him. He stayed in Congress many years. He retired when it was still legal to retain your campaign donations for personal funds when you retired. In fact, he retired because the law was changing and he had over $1Million in the campaign war chest or bonus bucks as he called them. A real public servant, his goal was to get away with as much loot as he could. It came out during the Boston priest scandals, that while a teacher at a fancy prep school, Mr. Studds had his way with a few of the lads who were students.

Or how about the NJ govenor, McGreevey the Gay-American.

Historically, the R's have had money scandals, while the D's had sex. But since the R's have become more "inclusive" they are starting to have sex scandals too, but mostly pathetic ones, like Foley sending out dirty emails and Larry Craig wanting to give a BJ in the shitter. Then announcing, "I am not gay!". I guess his defense could be that the stink of piss and shit makes him uncontrollably horny.

*DumbFuckEgypt*2490 reads

That guy in the other stall was a Democrat.

Now what?

I find it hard to believe that people on this board are REALLY SERIOUS about politicizing sex.

Amazing!

I hooked my 55 gallon drum of Cialis to the hospital drip and I've had wood since 6 a.m. YESTERDAY.

I'd DO a Libertarian if one walked by right now.

Chuck Darwin2641 reads

This is the way it works.

(1) Chest-thumping gets more bang per buck than anything.  In 10 seconds, you can get just about the same attention that takes 5 minutes of thought.  Sure, they're foot-shooting morons, but do the math - you can lose a LOT of foot-shooting morons if you can replace them at 30X the rate.  Think of the implications - you can clear an ecological niche for a human in a couple seconds, but it takes maybe 20 years to get one to reproductive age.  What the fuck do you need with rubbers?

(2) So people go to the lowest common denominator, and usually quickly.  May as well not waste time.  It's Gresham's law, and it's not like there's any real consequences here.

(3) This is particularly true where one party rationalizes itself in terms of chest-thumping.  Oh, they bad.  At least until their draft number comes up.

RightwingUnderground2240 reads

Alcee Hastings

As a federal judge he was impeached for bribery, corruption and perjury, and removed from office. Later the Dems in Florida elected him to the House of Representatives. He’s still there today.

Mel Reynolds
He was indicted for sexual assault and criminal sexual abuse of a sixteen-year-old campaign volunteer. Dispite this, he was reelected unopposed by the Dems. Eventually he was convicted on twelve counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice and solicitation of child pornography. Although he resigned and went to prison, he was eventually given a sentence commutation by The Clintons and then went to work for Jesse Jackson.

There's some tough love eh?

Chuck Darwin2870 reads

which is usually when they get caught out of money.

What amazes me is that  98.3% of the whining about queers comes from Republicans, yet 79.2% of the queers ARE Republicans!!

What's the saying, it's not the heat, it's the hypocrisy?  or something like that.

Chuck Darwin2834 reads

spend 97.2% of their time ranting about it, and 1.6% of their time moving the dirt from one room to the next!

Think I'll go outdoors and let the estrogen-disabled argue about cleaning the house.

along with Bobby Kennedy and Richard Nixon assistaed McCarthy while pursuing reds on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations....


And your point?  

Assholes come in all kinds of sizes, shapes, colors, creeds, religions (or non-religions), nationalities, professions, genders and sexual preferences, etc....

some are even members of TER.

-- Modified on 6/16/2008 9:08:17 AM

Satan_Here1898 reads

Jack0 is that you again?

Jack0sAgent2242 reads

you're gonna lose your Republican registration if you don't get on the stick!

let's recap.... so far - this year.

Ethiopia torture and rape.
http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008/06/12/ethiop19029.htm

China human rights violations harm the Olympic spirit....
http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008/06/17/china19142.htm

Zimbabwe - what can I say?
http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008/06/13/zimbab19131.htm

But of course the worse is the may 5th typhoon which struck Myanmar - AND that government's refusal of international aid... for fear that all would see the human rights violations....
http://resources.alibaba.com/topic/294595/May_5_Typhoon_Nagis_hit_Myanmar.htm


Yea, right. our pitiful selection of very bad political Imbaciles in face of these evils simply pales...

Jack0 you are not even close.... How do I believe in a god... because there is manifest evidence in the existance of evil.... and nature thrives on opposites... therefore there is a god simply by the evidence of evil...

Jack0sAgent1750 reads

Satin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satin
Sateen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sateen
Satan_Here:  just some broke dick, part time TER poster.
None of these are Satan, whose last known photo is attached here:

but really.... this is the type of juvenile stuff that I speak of... it is just silly.  but then again I guess you deny the human suffering that I point out in my links... and somehow think that paying $4 a gallon of gas is the exact same as trying to survive in Burma without the benefit of shelter - food and water... while being persecuted by a military dictatorship... yea,  you are really up there intellectually....  gotta admire ya...

just think - when EVEN the united nations calls a government corrupt (Burma) they must really be bad... unless of course it is the US.

Satan_Here2295 reads

I'm coming for you. See ya real soon you little whinny pussy.

A_Einstein2870 reads

for a person supposed to have been around science, your thought processes are, well

instead of addressing the very real human suffering that is permitted to continue around the globe.  It is irresponsible quibbling about moot points of rhetoric that causes most good men to be paralyzed into inaction.  Clearly in each of these instances the world needs to stand united and proclaim "enough is enough"!  

Instead, we get you.  Telling me I'm the one full of shit.  Seems to me, that was a self photograph of you....

Thread_Hijacker2125 reads

thanks for sharing.  Hijacking threads is MY job, and scabbing is a Bad Thing, so I will have to do a Bad Thing to you to keep all the karma in balance.

Try to keep up.  It's OK to ask where you can buy a clue.

A_Einstein2284 reads

distract you from reading.

Assume you were to read (I KNOW, it's an incredible assumption) and see something that said, "for a person supposed to have been around science, your THOUGHT PROCESSES (emphasis added) are (big picture of shit)" - then, what do you suppose that might mean?

Something not so good about your thought processes?  Maybe?  Poor intellectual discipline?  Maybe?  Unable to process evidence in a logical way, perhaps?

As I have stated numerous times, you seem to be tremeadously impressed with your "intellectual ability to psychoanalyze" anyone on this board who disagrees with YOUR point of view, or who expresses an opinion on anything.

What is truly sad about that is clearly you may have something to offer, but rather than offer it, you wish only to cloud the board with YOUR concerns about your opinion and how everyone else is wrong.  Trust me, I've heard better men than me make incredibly dumb statements that violate the laws of economics and physics.


So here is a new one, yea, I get the picture, however, your retort has NOTHING to do with the thread.... My point, we are worried about moot points in this country, while those on the left cry and whine about how bad our country is, when there are yardsticks out that that would indicate we are light years ahead of anyplace else - including much of Western Europe.  We have a political process which accomodates change, we have support systems which for the most part - do not fail the majority of folks they serve... and yes, some do fall through the cracks, but what you will not hear on the news is how many are well served....

Get a clue?   sure, but clearly not from you.  As you are in need of a few yourself.

Chuck Darwin1996 reads

the interesting thing is how easy it is to find Republican perverts, which is of course contrary to their campaign platform, and how relatively difficult it is to find Democratic perverts, which is also contrary to THEIR campaign platform.

You just can't trust anybody anymore.

Register Now!