at the U.N. admits that they have been wrong for 60 years.  The destruction of the planet is NOT imminent as they previously warned.  Rising oceans, melting polar caps and cow flatulence are NOT causing a noticeable difference in our climate.  It was all a fraud.  How much taxpayer money was scammed by THIS fraud.  It makes the Medical fraud look like small potatoes by comparison.  

Nobody cares.
Except you.

The U.N. on climate doesn't say anything like what you are misrepresenting.  According to the report: "The Earth's climate is more out of balance than at any time in observed history, as greenhouse gas concentrations drive continued warming of the atmosphere and ocean and melting of ice, according to the World Meteorological Organization. These rapid and large-scale changes have occurred within a few decades but will have harmful repercussions for hundreds - and potentially thousands - of years." CDL = Can Do Lies.

You should check out fox news website for the story, including the name of the committee, which I don't remember.  The MSM is, of course, burying the story until the leftie politicians that have been sowing fear for 60 years in order to scam tax dollars for their friends pushing solar panels, wind mills, and electric cars, car run for cover and distance themselves from the climate hoax through the election season. The conclusion is that the changes in the planet are normal and cyclical, have happened before and will happen again, but do NOT spell doom for the planet.  I'm sorry you bought into the fraud.  You will never get those tax dollars back to use for something that IS productive.  

And use those tax dollars for what? To fund a trump vanity project? To give to tax dollars to J6 rioters and convicted felons? To fund an illegal war in the middle east that has choked off 20% of the world's supply of oil?    Why would I check out the fox website when I can read and quote directly from the U.N. website? Why would you get your misinformation from fox rather than go directly to the source? Oh wait. I know why.

Probably yelling..”Atta Boy, you show them”..👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏😂

stalking me on the GD Board and playing Board Cop Wannabe.

from CKS with the original source.  I can't even imagine how stupid you feel now, but it's probably about as stupid as you look.  When I said it came out yesterday, I gave you a chance to look into it.  You didn't HAVE to look this moronic; it's a path you chose.  Poor Jizzman.

I knew you were a liar, a fraudster, and political hack, but I didn't know you were stupid too. This is an op-ed from a Fox contributor. While you and cks went to fox for your "news", I went to the actual source - the U.N. website. Why don't you read what the U.N. has posted and not what fox and an opinion writer has convinced you the report says? You won't because it's an inconvenient truth as Al Gore has called man-made climate change and it doesn't fit your preconceived narrative. Ok the world isn't ending today, but climate change will adversely affect the word of tomorrow.  

Why are we NOT surprised.   If oceans are rising, why did Obama buy beach front property in Martha's Vineyard and Hawaii?  Answer:  Because he's an insider that KNOWS it's a scam.  Keep drinking the Kool Aid, it will get you higher than weed.  

So now you are just using an old specious and inane argument about Obama's beachfront property. You've tried that old, tired distraction in the past. It's a lame argument and a diversion. Let's stick to the subject that you brought up. I challenge you to read the U.N. website and tell us what the actual source has to say about climate change. But you won't. You'll just read fox websites and right-wing op-ed musings that have no relationship to what the World Meteorological Organization and the U.N. have  reported. But don't stray too far from your right-wing bubble or you might actually learn something and your head will explode.

"Climate change HOAX," you can bet they are sure that climate change fear is on its death bed.  If you don't believe it, when was the last time you heard a Democrat running for Congress warning the public about climate change.   It seems everyone knows it's a hoax except you.  

CDL believes the NY Times!!!
How convenient!

Advocating for years that it is the definitive and most reliable source for all things political.  Do you need links to a few thousand posts of you singing their praises?

Hold on. It's not NYT reporting. It's the NYT who published the Marcus climate change denying op-ed. As always you lie about or distort everything.  

You write as if my post somehow suggested the Times article was not accurate or praiseworthy. I neither said nor suggested any such thing. I simply pointed out the irony of YOU relying on the Times.

you are right, I realize now your post was just general whining.

so he puts in a parting shot as he slinks away under a...

This is jizzhams mo.  

First, you are being unusually inept at maintaining your so-called "ignore" list. Second, not only do you continue to NOT ignore me, but you repeat the same weak, hackneyed argument. Third, while you are not ignoring me you are are ignoring the substance of my post that what appeared in the NYT was not NYT reporting rather an opinion from a climate change denier. Fourth, you've ignored the simple truth that reading the U.N. website on the World Meteorological Organization's study on climate completely negates the veracity of the opinion piece. Fifth, you seem to be on some pathetic warpath to insult members of this board who disagree with you. Your post is completely gratuitous and demonstrates your desperate attempt for attention.  

Yes, the article is an opinion piece, as I noted in my post below. But it’s not just one link, there is a trend. That piece was in response to another NYT published piece saying Dems shouldn’t put an emphasis on climate change anymore.

The other piece was also an opinion piece. Yes, it's a "trend" among climate change deniers.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the first piece written by a political type? It was my understanding he was not a climate change “denier” but was positing that climate change wasn’t a winning platform based on for Democrats anymore.

Actually the first opinion piece was written by Matt Huber. He is not a "political type" rather an academic.  He believes that while the climate situation is bad and getting worse, no amount of knowledge of science will reverse this in a world where the global infrastructure depends on fossil fuel for 80% of its power needs. He opines that political focus on the climate crisis is ineffective and that, in line with traditional socialist theory, the only plausible force for change is the working class. So basically the second op-ed by climate change denier David Marcus was a total perversion of Huber's opinion that climate change is real and getting worse and advocates a socialist solution. All this proves is that the right-wing will go to any lengths to deny climate science and that man-made climate change is real.

I feel like I'm on a merry-go-round. For the last time ignore the opinion pieces and read what's on the U.N. website or the report from the World Meteorological Organization.  Right-wingers should stop getting their misinformation from right-wing sources and get it directly from scientific or apolitical sources. Why is it that among major conservative political parties worldwide, it's only the Republican party in this country that denies man-made climate change?