Democratic senators are quietly moving away from Obama’s energy stance. Illinois senior senator Dick Durbin now supports offshore drilling. As does Harry Reid and Sherrod Brown.
Democrats Are Distancing Themselves from Obama. Obama is shaping up to be the only Democrat without a chair when the music stops. His latest ad claims offshore drilling won’t be effective, putting him in a terrible bind. If he sticks to his guns, he’s at odds with his party and the vast majority of Americans. If he flip flops, there’s yet another reason for his countrymen to conclude he’s nothing but a milquetoast flip-flopper whose words mean nothing.
Sherrod Brown is joining with George Voinovich in supporting offshore drilling. This spontaneous bipartisanship may soon become common practice. Most Americans support drilling for more oil.
Do we lift the ban on offshore drilling?
Sen. George V. Voinovich said yesterday that the combination of $4-per-gallon gas prices and rising voter support for more drilling could pave the way for a compromise that would have been unthinkable a year ago.
The Ohio Republican predicted that Congress will pass a comprehensive bill this year to clear the way for drilling off U.S. coasts while providing more money to develop cleaner energy sources.
That’s quite a prediction. And I bet that you would lay odds that he is right. It only emphasizes how completely out of touch Obama is.
Experts believe we have a supply of oil available if we drill for it...but not without concern for environmental degradation. It's wise to make available as many resources as we can. And keep every last drop of oil produced.
Obama is right on one thing though. We won’t see a return on this for maybe a decade. But it will be a return. So it takes time. We won’t have it if we don’t start it. Obama prefers NOT starting it.
The federal government estimates that 89 billion barrels of oil could be off the East, West and Gulf coasts. The U.S. consumes 20 million barrels of oil every day.
Its not a large amount of oil, but it is American oil that we can have at the ready should the rest of the world decide to say "GODAMMMM AMERIKKKKA!".
Wouldn't you rather be protected? Even if that protection is temporary. Even if that protection takes a while to achieve. It provides a buffer.
I sure wish we had one right now (if it wasn't for the last democratic president who vetoed it).
Obama is only half right in saying it would take a decade to get the oil to the pump. It would take that long for ANWAR (Alaska) oil because they have to move equipment into an isolated area and built a pipe-line to get the oil out, which would take a lot of time with Alaskan winters, etc.
On the other hand, drilling in the lower 48 would produce a product that could get to the refinery within a much shorter time.
Anyway, even if he is right that it would take a decade, that was one reason why similar proposals were killed 10 years ago - because they would not have provided instant relief. But if they started in 1998, they would be providing relief now.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!