Politics and Religion

Distinction without a difference.
coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 528 reads
posted
1 / 10

First he said everyone had to have at least the first vaccination.  Then he said fully vaccinated was both shots.  Now he says "fully vaccinated" means you have two vaccinations AND the booster shot.  How long before he moves the goal posts again and says fully vaccinated means four injections, not three?  As it stands now, he is lumping the people who are vaccinated but not received the booster in with the people who are completely unvaccinated when he talks about people who are not doing their part to end the pandemic.  

inicky46 61 Reviews 19 reads
posted
2 / 10

First of all, this is NOT new.
Second, he didn't just pull the guidance out of his ass like you pull your posts. He is simply following the guidance from the CDC, which has based its recommendations on the actual levels of immunity in vaccinated people.
Excuse me for dignifying your trolling with a response.

inicky46 61 Reviews 28 reads
posted
3 / 10

Apparently his little pea brain can't wrap itself around the concept that a new disease is a moving target and we have to learn from what actually happens in the field. Not to mention the virus keeps evolving so our response must evolve with it.  
Wanker = Stupidest Putz on TER.

inicky46 61 Reviews 27 reads
posted
4 / 10

Wanker's study (or at least his summary of it) fails to mention that the numbers include breakthrough cases of Covid in fully-vaccinated people. BUT, those people generally get only mild symptoms and don't end up in the hospital.
Which is the point.
Unless you are a terminally dumb Wanker.

inicky46 61 Reviews 15 reads
posted
5 / 10

You forgot Ivermectin enemas and Hydroxychloroquine douches.
Oh, and don't forget to inject yourself with bleach and shove a UV lightbulb up your ass.
Simpleton.

inicky46 61 Reviews 19 reads
posted
6 / 10

That's nothing compared to Wanker, who THINKS he knows all about science but actually knows ZILCH.
But thanks for spreading more toxic bullshit here, Einstein.

inicky46 61 Reviews 37 reads
posted
7 / 10

And even if he did (which I doubt based on Lying Wanker simply asserting it), he can still be wrong about all the other shit you posted above. I mean Fauci had a lot to do with curing AIDS but you still ridicule him.
So much for your "dUh sCienCe," dimwit.

impposter 49 Reviews 20 reads
posted
8 / 10

The first effective HIV drug that got FDA approval, AZT, came out of the NIH in 1987. Others followed.

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: I’m not blaming Fauci for AIDS.
I’m blaming him for wasting valuable time trying to develop a vaccine for HIV instead of using therapeutics.

inicky46 61 Reviews 25 reads
posted
9 / 10

AIDS is extremely well controlled by a cocktail of drugs that make it undetectable in unable to be spread by sex. What would you call that, numbnuts?
Read the link, Wanker.

impposter 49 Reviews 24 reads
posted
10 / 10

In your post, above, you complained: "I’m blaming him [Fauci] for wasting valuable time trying to develop a vaccine for HIV instead of using therapeutics." And now you are complaining that AIDS drugs are "NOT A CURE."
.
The most famous and successful vaccines are not CURES, they are preventatives: polio, smallpox, measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, ...  . In general, therapeutic antibiotics can CURE bacterial infections. Also in general, therapeutics for cancer, diabetes, heart diseases, high blood pressure, ED, central nervous system diseases, ... are "NOT A CURE" for any of those conditions but they successfully treat and control symptoms and promote a longer and higher quality of life.  
.
Do you dismiss long-term therapeutic treatments as failed efforts?

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: I would call that NOT A CURE.
Because as soon as you stop taking those drugs guess what comes back?

Register Now!