... inagural parties and contribute the $$$ to help the people affected by the Tsunami?

What about the GOP recount in Washington?

-- Modified on 1/17/2005 4:59:26 AM

and publicly appropiate the money saved to help the Tsunami victims (and perhaps other needy areas like AIDS in Africa).  That, in my opinion, would be a very worthwhile and proper gesture.  I also think that you're still smarting from the embarrassment of your original post "Why I won't be Sending Contributions to the 'Tsunami Victims in Asia' Soon."

-- Modified on 1/17/2005 11:03:45 AM

Yeah, I can see how you would want to use that as an alias. It's so fitting!

-- Modified on 1/17/2005 12:15:55 PM

... misread everything, you sanctimonious prick.

-- Modified on 1/17/2005 2:10:45 PM

I wonder why the Democratic party didn't do that when they had theie inaugurals? We've always had needy people right here in the US.

When the left does it, then they can preach, until then, its just hypocrisy...

In doing some research, I find that while the first Clinton inaugural only cost some $700,000, the second Clinton inaugural cost some 12 million. An exhorbitant sum and certainly an outrageous difference between the two, way out of proportion to the economic increase of the time. All of it from generous special interest donators from High Tech and the dot com budding boomers. I was one of them at the time.
While I do believe the amount being spent on the Bush inaugural is excessive considering the world geopolitical situation at this time, the fact is, its almost all being paid for by private donations. Special interests and big business they may be, and the favors are certainly being bought. But there is no doubt these same sources are also being generous with tsunami relief donations. Especially since it is a tax deductible item now.
No guys, this time, the Dems and the left wing have no right to bitch.

Personally, I'd rather work on a 2006 campaign to being back rationality to our Federal government. The Gingrinch did it in 1994, and witness the carnage he has wrought. We need an anti-Newt to help correct the wrongs the right has perpetuated.

Newt's billiant leadership resulted in the Republicans taking over both houses and the fantastic economic prosperity of the 1990's.  Willie Clinton was just smart enough to get the f**** out of the way.
What's gonna be the lefty theme in 2006?  I can't even guess.  Who's gonna be your champion in 2008?  Hillary Clinton!?!   That wicked ugly witch can stay right on her broomstick and fly right back to the cave she came from.   I'LL TELL YOU THIS-- We're gonna give her a whupin if she tries to run for President. And guess who our champion is gonna be-----   Condi Rice!!!!! There's gonna be a cat fight and Condi is gonna bitch slap that dumb ugly witch Hilliary so hard that her ugly capped teeth are gonna lose their caps. HEEEHAAA

You're a bloody hypocrite, GOP Geezer. You and the rest of the partisan rhetoric spewing fucking hypocrites, every last damned one of ya.
You extoll the virtues of this man. This hypocritical bastard who was calling for the impeachment of Bill Clinton for getting a blow job from an intern at the same time he was carrying on an open and illicit ADULTEROUS affaire with his assistant. Bloody fucking hypocrite.

This same arrogant son of a bitch who wrapped himself in the flag of self-righteousness while being condemned by his own party and fined $300,000 for illegally manipulating monies through his PAC. Bloody fucking hypocrite.

Gingrinch is a lowlife who crawled out from under a rock. Why do you think he's called Newt? Send Gingrinch back to Amazon.com where he writes reviews of trashy books written by Louis L'Amour clones.

If Gingrinch is who you're gonna try to foist on us in 2008, not even Karl Rove or that cunt Katherine Harris will be able to fix the election. The Dems could run George Dukakis or Walter Mondale against Gingrinch and reclaim the Oval Office from the fundamentalist pigs running the show now.
Geezer, I'm using the same lowbrow level of diatribe your gods on Fox resort to so you will understand me. Rational logical dialogue is simply not an option with closed-minded lemmings.
I try to be a nice guy, be civilized, and try to present my viewpoint in a respectful and civilized manner. But you and a few others here have got a real big mouth when it comes to spewing out partisan rhetoric, but you never present any valid argument, just a bunch of self-righteous bile and hateful crap like your diatribe about Hillary. So here ya go, written in a manner more befitting the cretins on Fox than any intellectual exchange one might usually expect from me.

-- Modified on 1/17/2005 11:02:14 PM

... Couldn't (just once) I have a moderate I could vote for.  Somebody with brains that appeals to the middle.

In any case, thanks Geez!  One of your rants makes my day!

Harry

Willie's little wicked willie caused Willie------To commit ---PERJURY!!  That means lieing under oath!!  Willie was----IMPEACHED!!!HahaHAha.  And then he was disbarred FOR LIFE!!!
So what do you have to say about that--huh huh huh!?!?!?!

You posted an outright lie. Perjury has more requirements than just lying under oath.

From dictionary.com:

"The deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete testimony under oath. "

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=perjury

And from FindLaw.com:

"Another fact little known to those who don't live in the court system every day is that there is rarely any earthly punishment for lying in court. There is, of course, the crime of perjury. Here is how California defines it (a definition that's pretty typical of those used by other states):

"Every person who, having taken an oath that he or she will testify...truly before any competent tribunal..., willfully...states as true any material matter which he or she knows to be false...is guilty of perjury.""

http://public.findlaw.com/litigation_appeals/nolo/ency/DCF5835D-22EF-48D0-9112508F763F7135.html

Although you were correct in the sense that he wdid mis-speak. Clinton was not disbarred for life, it was only for a specified period of a few years (I can't recall the exact time, in the 5-10 years).